Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.          )

Filed by the Registrantý

Filed by a Party other than the Registranto

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Schedule 14A
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (Amendment No.    )
Filed by the Registrant 
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant 
Check the appropriate box:

o


Preliminary Proxy Statement

o


Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

ý


Definitive Proxy Statement

o


Definitive Additional Materials

o


Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12


lpi-20230405_g1.jpg
Vital Energy, Inc.
(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
No fee required.
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials
Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 24(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11



lpi-20230405_g2.jpg


LAREDO PETROLEUM, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)


(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ý


No fee required.

o


Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5)Total fee paid:

o


Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o


Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.



(1)


Amount Previously Paid:
(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3)Filing Party:
(4)Date Filed:
1

Table of Contents

LOGO

March 28, 2018

To the Stockholders of Laredo Petroleum, Inc.:

        You are invited to attend our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be held at the Bank of America Building, Lower Level, 15 West Sixth Street, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119, on Thursday, May 17, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. Central Time (the "Annual Meeting").

        Details of the business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting are described in the attached Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Letter from Our Chair and Proxy Statement.

        We are mailing to most of our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials ("Notice") instead of a paper copy of our Annual Report, which includes our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, Proxy Statement and proxy card. We believe this process enables us to provide stockholders with the information needed in connection with our Annual Meeting in a timely manner, while saving costs and conserving resources. The Notice contains instructions on how to access these documents over the Internet, as well as instructions on how to request a paper copy of the materials, if desired. All stockholders who do not receive a Notice should receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail.

        Your vote is important, and we encourage you to vote whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. Please either vote by telephone or over the Internet or sign, date and return your proxy card, following the instructions on the Notice or proxy materials, so that your shares will be represented. If you are a stockholder of record and plan to attend the Annual Meeting, you may also vote in person.

        We look forward to seeing you at the Annual Meeting.


Our Chief Executive Officer

Sincerely,



GRAPHIC

Randy A. Foutch
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Table of Contents

LAREDO PETROLEUM, INC.
15 W. Sixth Street, Suite 900
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119

NOTICE OF 2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TIME9:00 a.m. Central Time on Thursday, May 17, 2018.

PLACE


Bank
April 6, 2023
To the Stockholders of America Building, Lower Level, 15 West Sixth Street, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119.

ITEMS OF BUSINESS


(1) To elect two Class II directors to our board of directors to hold office until the expiration of their three-year term in 2021 and thereafter until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified, and to elect one Class III director to our board of directors to hold office until the expiration of his one-year term in 2019.



(2) To ratify the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as the Company's independent registered accounting firm.



(3) To hold an advisory vote approving the compensation of our named executive officers.



(4) To hold an advisory vote determining the frequency of future advisory votes on compensation of our named executive officers.



(5) To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or at any adjournment or postponement thereof.

RECORD DATE


You can vote if, at the close of business on March 20, 2018, you were a holder of record of our common stock.

PROXY VOTING


All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting in person. However, to ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting, you are urged to vote promptly by voting by telephone at 1-800-690-6903 or over the Internet at www.proxyvote.com (or if you received a paper copy of the proxy materials, by signing and returning the proxy card in the envelope provided).
Vital Energy, Inc.:



IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE
STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 17, 2018



The Company's Notice of Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement and our 2017 Annual Report, including the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, are available over the Internet at http://materials.proxyvote.com/516806. Alternatively, if you received a paper copy of the proxy materials (which includes the proxy card), you may vote by signing and returning the proxy card in the envelope provided.

        This Notice, Proxy Statement and the proxy card/voting instruction card are first being sent or made available to stockholders on or about March 28, 2018.

March 28, 2018
Tulsa, Oklahoma



We are Vital Energy. Post our recent rebrand, we write this note with great enthusiasm to lead our industry as we responsibly develop and produce the products that energize the world. Our strategy has been unwavering since 2019 and we have successfully repositioned our Company within the Permian Basin.
Our recent acquisitions have grown oil production, built scale, increased margins and improved our profitability. Our disciplined developments have led to higher Free Cash Flow and enabled absolute debt reduction, improved leverage and a strengthened capital structure. Our recent successes have been supported by the application of innovative new technologies that have increased production and revenues, enhanced returns and helped reduce emissions. We have the right strategy to create long-term value for our shareholders.
The year 2022 was one of remarkable accomplishments:
Generated Company-record cash flows from operating activities of $830 million and Free Cash Flow(1) of $220 million
 Reduced term-debt by $285 million and strengthened our leverage ratio(2) to 1.18x at year-end
Implemented a $200 million equity repurchase program and repurchased $37 million of common stock
Increased oil production nearly 20%
Organically added oil-weighted inventory locations in Glasscock County, maintaining more than 8 years of oil-weighted inventory in Howard and western Glasscock counties
Reported Scope 1 GHG emissions intensity reduction of 34% and methane intensity reduction of 63%, compared to 2019 baseline levels; Added a 2025 recycled water target and established a combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions intensity goal for 2030.




By Order ofOur rebranding signifies our transformation to a Company that is profitable, sustainable, engaged with the Board of Directors,

GRAPHIC

Kenneth E. Dornblaser
Senior Vice President, General Counselcommunities in which we operate and Corporate Secretarycommitted to delivering low-cost energy that powers the future. Our employees and executives are engaged and focused on growing stockholder value and building a Company that delivers high returns for years to come.

Table

(1)    See Annex A for definitions of Contents


TABLE OF CONTENTS

non-GAAP financial measures.
(2)    Leverage measured by Net Debt/Consolidated EBITDAX. Non-GAAP financial measure; please see Annex A for definitions of non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliations of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures.



Page

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1

PROXY STATEMENT QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

2
Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
2

CORPORATE STRUCTURE

Our 2023 Outlook is focused on generating Free Cash Flow and balances debt reduction and the sustainable return of cash to shareholders with disciplined capital investments to profitably grow our business. Our development programs are focused on the most productive opportunities in Howard County and we recently announced an accretive acquisition that expands our Midland Basin footprint into Upton County and adds additional high-margin production and inventory.
We expect that our financial and operational results in 2023 will continue to benefit from our focused efforts on technological innovation. We are utilizing machine-learning algorithms to optimize production and increase revenue. As an example, we are now able to automatically adjust our electric submersible pumps multiple times per day. This allows us to cost-effectively enhance production and extend the productive life of our wells. Dynamic routing algorithms prioritize operator routes, improving response times and reducing production downtime. In addition, we are mitigating emissions events by employing cameras programmed to quickly recognize emissions and predict when these events could occur.
We made significant progress advancing our ESG initiatives across the business in 2022. Our commitment to sustainable energy production continues to deliver meaningful greenhouse gas and methane intensity reductions. Our compensations actions, which are detailed in this proxy, incentivize the right behaviors and reward performance in line with our objectives. This is demonstrated by the weighting of safety metrics in our executive short-term incentive plan goals. For the first time in our history, we recorded zero employee incidents in a calendar year.
Our annual stockholder outreach effort solicits input from institutions representing more than half of our outstanding shares, providing an opportunity for our Board and senior leadership to engage with our largest stockholders on our strategic priorities and disclosure practices. Based on these discussions, we remain confident that our strategy and business plan are aligned with our stockholders’ expectations. Our Board, management and employees have proven we can deliver results and we are excited to continue to grow the Company and deliver value in the coming years.
Thank you for your investment in Vital Energy.
10

ITEM ONE: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Sincerely,
11

DIRECTORS

lpi-20230405_g3.jpg
lpi-20230405_g4.jpg
lpi-20230405_g5.jpg
13
lpi-20230405_g6.jpg

MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF DIRECTORS

William E. Albrecht
Non-Executive
Board Chair
18

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

20

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

21

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

21

Introduction

21

Named

Jason Pigott
President & Chief
Executive Officers

21

Fiscal Year 2017 Performance Highlights and Impact on Incentive Compensation

21

Shareholder Say-on-Pay Results and Management Responsiveness

23

Summary of our Compensation Program

24

Compensation Best Practices

24

Compensation Structure Supports Alignment Between Executives and Shareholders

25

Process for Determining Executive Compensation

27

Elements of Compensation

29

Compensation Program for 2018

36

Other Benefits

40

Employment, Severance or Change in Control Agreements

41

Other Matters

42

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

45

Summary Compensation

46

Realized Compensation

47

Grants of Plan-Based Awards for the Year Ended December 31, 2017

48

Laredo Petroleum, Inc. Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan

48

Registration Rights

50

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017 Fiscal Year-End

50

Stock Award Vestings, Stock Option Exercises and Performance Unit Vestings in Fiscal Year 2017

52

Pension Benefits

52

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

52

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

53

CEO Pay Ratio

57

Compensation of Directors

58

Securities Authorized for Issuance under the Equity Incentive Plan

60

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

61

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

62

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

64

Corporate Governance Guidelines

64

Code of Conduct and Business Ethics

65

Board of Directors Leadership

65

Communications with the Board of Directors

66

Director Independence

66

Executive Sessions of the Board of Directors

66

Financial Literacy of Audit Committee and Designation of Financial Experts

66

Oversight of Risk Management

66

Attendance at Annual Meetings

67

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

68

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

70Officer

Table of Contents




Page

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

70
3
Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
All stockholders of record as of the Record Date, March 28, 2023, are cordially invited to attend the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
This Notice contains the meeting logistics, business agenda and voting options. You will also find the link for all Proxy Materials, including the Proxy Statement and our 2022 Annual Report. Your vote is important, and we encourage you to vote promptly whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. We look forward to seeing you.
April 6, 2023
Sincerely,
lpi-20230405_g7.jpg
Mark Denny
Senior Vice President—General Counsel & Secretary
Items up for Vote
2023 Annual Meeting Information
Date and Time
May 25, 2023 at 9:00 a.m.
Central Daylight Time
Place
Santa Fe Plaza Building
521 E. 2nd Street
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74120
Record Date
March 28, 2023
How to Vote
Any stockholder of record at the close of business on the Record Date may vote. The deadline to vote is 11:59 p.m. ET on May 24, 2023, except if you attend the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please vote as soon as possible to ensure the representation of your shares in case you are unable to attend.
By Telephone
1-800-690-6903
By Internet
www.proxyvote.com
By Mail
If you received a paper copy of the Proxy Materials, please complete, sign and return the proxy card in the envelope provided
My Mobile Device
Scan the QR Code
lpi-20230405_g8.jpg
In Person
Attend the Annual Meeting
ProposalsBoard
Recommendation
Proxy
Page
1To elect four Class I directors for a three-year term and one Class III director for a two-year term.FOR each
nominee
17
2To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023.FOR38
3To hold an advisory vote approving the compensation of our named executive officersFOR42
4To approve an amendment and restatement of the Certificate of Incorporation to clarify and eliminate obsolete provisionsFOR83
5To transact such other matters as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.
Proxy Materials
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 25, 2023. The Notice of Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 (“2022 Annual Report”), are available at http://materials.proxyvote.com/516806.
Important Information Regarding Meeting Attendance and Location. We intend to hold our Annual Meeting in person. However, due to the public health impact of COVID-19 and related travel concerns, we may impose additional procedures or limitations on meeting attendees beyond those described in the accompanying Proxy Statement. Such additional precautionary measures may include, in compliance with guidance issued by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, restricting the number of meeting attendees gathered in one room and requiring that all meeting attendees wear a mask and remain at a minimum six feet from other persons at all times.
Alternatively, we are planning for the possibility that the meeting may be held solely by means of remote communication. If we take this step, we will announce by press release the decision to do so in advance, along with details on how to participate in the meeting. If it becomes necessary, a meeting by remote communication will not impact your ability to vote in advance of the meeting by telephone, internet, mobile device or mail.


4Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
Table of Contents
Our 2023 Proxy Statement and 2022 Annual Report are available online at
http://materials.proxyvote.com/516806


Table of Contents


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

5
Summary
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.Statement for the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”). This summary does not contain all of the information you should consider and is not a form for voting. You should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting.

2023 Annual Meeting Information
Date and Time
May 25, 2023 at 9:00 a.m.
Central Daylight Time
Place
Santa Fe Plaza Building
521 E. 2nd Street
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74120
Record Date
March 28, 2023
Proposal OneProposal TwoProposal ThreeProposal Four
Election of Directors at the 2023 Annual MeetingRatification of the Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmAdvisory Vote Approving the Compensation of Our Named Executive OfficersApproval of an Amendment and Restatement of the Certificate of Incorporation
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR the election of each of Dr. Craig M. Jarchow, Jason Pigott, Edmund P. Segner, III, Dr. Shihab Kuran and John Driver.
The Board unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR the appointment of Ernst & Young as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year 2023.
The Board unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR the advisory resolution approving the compensation of our named executive officers.
The Board unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR the approval of an amendment and restatement of the Certificate of Incorporation to clarify and eliminate obsolete provisions.
See page 17 for more information.
See page 38 for more information.
See page 42 for more information.
See page 83 for more information.


6Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
Company Overview
Vital Energy, Inc. (the “Company,” “Vital,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) is an independent energy company focused on the exploration, development and acquisition of oil and natural gas properties, primarily in the Permian Basin of West Texas. Our headquarters are in Tulsa, Oklahoma, and our development and production is in largely contiguous sections in the neighboring Texas counties of Howard, Glasscock, Reagan, Sterling and Irion.
Number of
Employees
Number of
Net Acres*
Proved
Reserves*
Production*
289163,286
302.3
million barrels of oil equivalent (three-stream)
77,947
barrels of oil equivalent per day (three-stream)
*      As of, or for the year ended, December 31, 2022, as applicable.
Value-Creation Strategy
Our strategy is to create long-term value for our stockholders through the responsible development of our Permian Basin acreage. Throughout 2022, we delivered on this strategy, the highlights of which include:
lpi-20230405_g9.jpg
Maintain
Capital Discipline
lpi-20230405_g10.jpg
Target
Accretive Acquisitions

lpi-20230405_g11.jpg
Generate
Free Cash Flow
lpi-20230405_g12.jpg
Advance
Sustainability and Responsible Production
lpi-20230405_g13.jpg
Reduce
Debt and Leverage
lpi-20230405_g14.jpg
Apply
Technology to Enhance Profitability


Summary7
Executing on Strategy in 2022
Generated Company-Record Cash Flows from Operating Activities and Net Income
FY-22 cash flows from operating activities of $830 million
FY-22 net income of $632 million
Generated Company-Record FCF(1) and Consolidated EBITDAX(1)
FY-22 FCF of $220 million and FY-22 Consolidated EBITDAX of $913 million
Reinvested 70% of operating cash flow
Strong Annual Production Growth
Driven by previous oil-weighted acquisitions
Continuing to optimize production through digital solutions
Divested Non-Operated Properties for $110 million
Proceeds used to reduce debt and hi-grade portfolio
Reduced Term Debt and Shares Outstanding
Utilized FCF and divestiture proceeds to repurchase
$285 million of term debt
490,536 common equity shares
Improved year-end leverage(2) by 0.96x to 1.18x at 12/31/2022
lpi-20230405_g15.jpg
(1)    See Annex A for definitions of non-GAAP financial measures.
(2)    Leverage measured by Net Debt/Consolidated EBITDAX. YE-21 Consolidated EBITDAX represents the second half of 2021 annualized due to significant acquisitions in 2021. Non-GAAP financial measure; please see Annex A for definitions of non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliations of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures.


8Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
Corporate Governance and Board Matters Overview
The Vital Energy Board of Directors (the “Board” or “Board of Directors”) currently consists of 10 directors serving staggered three year terms. Two Directors joined the Board in 2022 and, accordingly, the Board has nominated five directors for election at the Annual Meeting. Edmund Segner III, Dr. Craig Jarchow, Jason Pigott and Dr. Shihab Kuran are being nominated to serve as Class I directors of the Company to hold office until the 2026 Annual Meeting and John Driver is being nominated to serve as a Class III director of the Company to hold office until the 2025 Annual Meeting.
Board Composition & Attributes
Our Nominating, Corporate Governance, Environmental and Social Committee continually accesses the Board and the skill sets, experiences and characteristics represented by the directors to ensure alignment with Vital Energy’s strategic objectives and evolving needs and expectations. The Board is committed to active refreshment and believes that its membership should reflect a diversity of industries, experience, gender, race, ethnicity and age to help ensure that it serves the long-term interests of stockholders and promotes the best interests of the Company. The below skills matrix is assessed regularly and constantly evolves with the needs of the organization.


Summary9
lpi-20230405_g16.jpg
lpi-20230405_g17.jpg
lpi-20230405_g18.jpg
lpi-20230405_g19.jpg
lpi-20230405_g20.jpg
lpi-20230405_g21.jpg
lpi-20230405_g22.jpg
lpi-20230405_g23.jpg
lpi-20230405_g24.jpg
lpi-20230405_g25.jpg
lpi-20230405_g26.jpg
lpi-20230405_g27.jpg
lpi-20230405_g28.jpg
lpi-20230405_g29.jpg
lpi-20230405_g30.jpg
lpi-20230405_g31.jpg
lpi-20230405_g32.jpg
lpi-20230405_g33.jpg
William E. Albrecht
Former President, Oxy Oil
and Gas, Americas
712020
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g35.jpg
John Driver
CEO, Lynx Technology
582022
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g36.jpg
Frances Powell Hawes
Former Chief Financial
Officer, Grant Prideco, Inc.
682018
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g37.jpg
Jarvis V. Hollingsworth
Vice Chairman and Chief
Operating Officer, Irradiant
Partners, L.P.
602020
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g38.jpg
Dr. Craig M. Jarchow
President, CEO and
Director, TG Natural
Resources, LLC
622019
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g39.jpg
Dr. Shihab Kuran
Founder and CEO, Power Edison
532022
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g40.jpg
Lisa M. Lambert 
Founder and President,
National Grid Partners
552020
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g41.jpg
Lori A. Lancaster
Former Managing Director,
UBS Securities, Global
Energy Group
532020
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g42.jpg
Jason Pigott
President and CEO,
Vital Energy, Inc.
492019
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g43.jpg
Edmund P. Segner, III
Former President
and Director, EOG
Resources, Inc.
692011
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
lpi-20230405_g34.jpg
No. of Directors9/107/109/104/107/103/105/106/1010/104/104/107/104/103/104/10


10Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
Governance Highlights
Below is a short summary of our practices and policies. See the Director Oversight of Risk Management, Director Meetings & Executive Sessions, and Director Committees sections for a full discussion of the Board’s responsibilities.
General InformationItems to be Voted On
Governance HighlightsIndependent Oversight

Meeting:

Active Board oversight of the Company’s strategy and risk management.
Corporate culture of integrity.
Annual Meetingreview of Stockholders

corporate governance documents including Board committee charters.
Prohibition on pledging, hedging, short sales and derivative transactions by directors or employees.
Stock ownership requirement for directors to own an aggregate of $400,000 in Vital stock.
Robust executive compensation clawback policy covering financial restatements and improper conduct.
Prohibition on director overboarding, ensuring that no director serves on more than four public company boards.
Active stockholder engagement to solicit feedback on a wide variety of issues.
Commitment to sustainability through enhanced oversight of ESG initiatives and publication of annual sustainability report.
No excessive perquisites.
Independently managed, toll-free Ethics Reporting Hotline, 1-844-732-6240, www.MyComplianceReport.com.
Majority voting standard for uncontested director elections.
9 of 10 directors are independent.
Separate independent Board Chair and CEO.
Only independent directors eligible to serve on Board committees.
The Board and its Committees conduct regular executive sessions without management.
Independent auditor and independent compensation consultant.
​  

Meeting Location: Bank of America Building, Lower Level,
                15 West Sixth Street, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119

ProposalBoard of Director
Recommendations
​  Robust Refreshment

Date: 9:00 a.m. Central Time

Comprehensive, ongoing Board succession planning process with a focus on May 17, 2018

Record Date: March 20, 2018

Common Shares Outstanding asdiversity.

Mandatory retirement age of Record Date:

                241,159,073

75.
Annual Board and Board Committee self-assessments and review of Board leadership structure.

No. 1: Election of two directors to a three-year term and one director to a one-year term

FOR
​  

Stock Symbol: LPI

Stock Exchange: NYSE

Registrar & Transfer Agent: American Stock Transfer &
                Trust Company

No. 2: Ratification of appointment of independent public accounting firm

FOR
​  

State and Year of Incorporation: Delaware (2011)

Corporate Headquarters: 15 West Sixth Street, Suite 900
                Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119

No. 3: Advisory vote to approve the compensation of named executive officers

FOR
​  

Corporate website: www.laredopetro.com

Investor Relations website: http:\\investor.laredopetro.com

No. 4: Advisory vote to determine the frequency of future advisory votes on compensation of named executive officers

ONE YEAR
​  
Corporate GovernanceExecutive Compensation

Board Meetings in fiscal 2017: 7

Standing Board Committees (Meetings in fiscal 2017):

        •  Audit (8)
        •  Compensation (5)
        •  Nominating & Corporate Governance (4)

Separate Chairman and CEO: No

Lead Independent Director: Yes

Independent Directors Meet without Management: Yes

Staggered Board of Directors: Yes

Stockholder Rights Plan: No

Director and Officer Share Ownership Guidelines: Yes

Hedging and Short Sale Policy: Yes

CEO: Randy A. Foutch (age 66)

Fiscal 2017 CEO Pay Mix:

Salary earned: 12%

Short-term incentive cash bonus: 16%

Long-term incentive equity awards: 72%

Key Elements of our Executive Compensation Program:

Competitive salary rate

Short-term incentive cash bonus

Long-term incentive equity awards comprised of:

o

Performance units

o

Restricted stock

Other Benefit Plans and Programs such as a 401(k) Plan

Fiscal 2017 Highlights

        In 2017, despite continuing challenges in the energy industry, we successfully grew production as well as our reserves of oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids ("NGL"). Among our operational highlights that we believe positively impacted current and future growth in the value of the Company are the following:

  •  Produced a Company record 58,273 barrels of oil equivalent ("BOE") per day, resulting in production of 21.4 million BOE for the year and growth of approximately 17% from full-year 2016;

  •  Grew proved developed reserves organically by 36% in 2017;

  •  Generated drilling capital efficiency ("DCE") on a dollar-per-BOE basis of $8.06;

  •  Generated a return on average capital employed ("ROACE") on a three-year average of over 12%;

  •  Reduced unit lease operating expenses ("LOE") to $3.53 per BOE in full-year 2017, a reduction of approximately 15% from full-year 2016;

  •  Generated a drilling rate of return ("ROR") on 62 completed horizontal development wells of 33%;

  •  Converted all 31 proved undeveloped ("PUD") reserves locations booked at December 31, 2016 into proved producing locations in 2017;

  •  Reduced debt by $690 million to a total debt level of $800 million and net debt to 1.3 times annualized fourth quarter Adjusted EBITDA. See our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the "2017 Annual Report") for further information and a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss);

  •  Recognized approximately $28 million of net cash benefits from Laredo Midstream Services, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("LMS"), field infrastructure investments through reduced capital and operating costs and increased revenue;

  •  Sold LMS' 49% interest in Medallion Gathering & Processing LLC ("Medallion"), which owns and operates more than 650 miles of pipeline in the Permian Basin ("Medallion-Midland Basin") for approximately $831 million in net proceeds, which is approximately three times our aggregate investment; and

  •  Received $16 million of net cash settlements on maturing and early terminated derivatives, net of premiums paid, increasing our average sales price for oil by $3.48 per barrel ("Bbl") and for natural gas by $0.06 per one thousand cubic feet ("Mcf") of natural gas compared to pre-hedged average sales prices.


Table of Contents

LAREDO PETROLEUM, INC.
15 W. Sixth Street, Suite 900
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119

PROXY STATEMENT
2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

        The board of directors of Laredo Petroleum, Inc. (the "Company," "Laredo," "we," "us" or "our") requests your proxyWe strive to implement and maintain a corporate governance structure that is both stockholder friendly and appropriate for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders that will be held Thursday, May 17, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. Central Time, at the Bank of America Building, Lower Level, 15 West Sixth Street, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119 (the "Annual Meeting"). By granting the proxy, you authorize the persons named on the proxy to represent you and vote your shares at the Annual Meeting. Those persons will also be authorized to vote your shares to adjourn the Annual Meeting from time to time and to vote your shares at any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting.

        In accordance with the rules and regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), we are providing our stockholders access to our proxy materials on the Internet. Accordingly, a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the "Notice") will be mailed to mostcompany of our stockholders on or about March 28, 2018. The Notice will include (i) instructions on how to accesssize in our industry. At least annually, but typically more frequently, the Company's proxy materials electronically, (ii)Board reviews the date, timeCompany’s corporate governance practices in light of current trends and location of the Annual Meeting, (iii) a description of the matters intended to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting, (iv) a list of the materials being made available electronically, (v) instructions on how a stockholder can request to receive paper or e-mail copies of the Company's proxy materials, (vi) any control/identification numbers that a stockholder needs to access his or her proxy card and instructions on how to access the proxy card and (vii) information about attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. Stockholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice, or request a printed set of the proxy materials to be sent to them by following instructions on the Notice.

        If you choose to receive future proxy materials by e-mail, you will receive an e-mail next year with instructions containing a link to those materials and a link to the proxy voting site. Your election to receive proxy materials by e-mail or printed form will remain in effect until you terminate it.

Q.
Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

A.
Holders of record of our common stock at the close of business on March 20, 2018, which we refer to as the "Record Date," are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. As of the Record Date, there were 241,159,073 shares of our common stock outstanding. Stockholders are entitled to cast one vote per share on each matter presented for consideration and action at the Annual Meeting.

Q.
What is the purpose of the Annual Meeting?

A.
At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will consider and vote upon the following matters:

(1)
Election of two Class II directors to our board of directors until the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in the year 2021 and until their respective successors are duly elected, and the election of one Class III director to our board of directors until the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in the year 2019;

(2)
Ratification of the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2018;

(3)
An advisory vote approving the compensation of our named executive officers;
investor feedback.


Table of Contents

Q.
Why did I receive a Notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials this year instead of a full set of proxy materials?

A.
As permitted by SEC rules, we are providing access to our proxy materials over the Internet. As a result, we are sending to most of our stockholders a Notice instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials. The Notice contains instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet and how to request a paper copy. In addition, stockholders may request to receive future proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by e-mail. A stockholder's election to receive proxy materials by mail or e-mail will remain in effect until the stockholder terminates it.

Q.
Why didn't I receive a Notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials?

A.
We are providing certain stockholders, including those who have previously requested to receive paper copies of the proxy materials, with paper copies of the proxy materials instead of a Notice. If you would like to help reduce the costs we incur in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receive all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions provided with your proxy materials and on your proxy card or voting instruction card to vote using the Internet. When prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access stockholder communications electronically in the future.

Q.
Can I vote my stock by filling out and returning the Notice?

A.
No. However, the Notice will provide instructions on how to vote over the Internet, by telephone, by requesting and returning a paper proxy card or by submitting a ballot in person at the Annual Meeting.

Q.
How can I access the proxy materials over the Internet?

A.
Your Notice or proxy card will contain instructions on how to view our proxy materials on the Internet. Our proxy materials are also available on our website at: www.laredopetro.com.

You may vote by any of the following four methods:

(1)
Internet.    Vote over the Internet at www.proxyvote.com, the website for Internet voting. Simply follow the instructions on the Notice, or if you received a proxy card by mail, follow the instructions on the proxy card, and you can confirm that your vote has been properly recorded. If you vote on the Internet, you can request electronic delivery of future proxy materials. Internet voting facilities for stockholders of record will be available 24 hours a day and will close at 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on May 16, 2018.

(2)
Telephone.    Vote by telephone by following the instructions on the Notice, or if you received a proxy card, by following the instructions on the proxy card. Easy-to-follow voice prompts allow you to vote your shares and confirm that your vote has been properly recorded. Telephone voting facilities for stockholders of record will be available 24 hours a day and will close at 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on May 16, 2018.

(3)
Mail.    If you received a proxy card by mail, vote by mail by completing, signing, dating and returning your proxy card in the pre-addressed, postage-paid envelope provided. If you vote by

Table of Contents

Q.
How can I vote my shares in person at the Annual Meeting?

A.
Stockholders of Record.    If your shares are registered directly in your name with the American Stock Transfer and Trust Company ("AST"), our "transfer agent," you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares, and the Notice or proxy materials are being mailed to you. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to vote in person at the Annual Meeting. If you choose to do so, you can bring the proxy card or vote using the ballot provided at the Annual Meeting. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we recommend that you vote your shares in advance as described above so that your vote will be counted if you decide later not to attend the Annual Meeting.

B.
Beneficial Owners.    Most of our stockholders hold their shares in street name through a broker, bank or other nominee rather than directly in their own name. In that case, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, and the proxy materials are being forwarded to you together with a voting instruction card. As the beneficial owner, you are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting. Because a beneficial owner is not the stockholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you obtain a "legal proxy" from the broker, bank or nominee that holds your shares, giving you the right to vote the shares at the Annual Meeting. You will need to contact your broker, bank or nominee to obtain a legal proxy, and you will need to bring it to the Annual Meeting in order to vote in person.

Q.
How does the board of directors recommend that I vote?

A.
Our board of directors recommends that you vote:

(1)
"FOR" the election of the Company's nominees to the board of directors.

(2)
"FOR" ratification of the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2018.

(3)
"FOR" the advisory resolution approving the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement (which disclosure includes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the executive compensation tables and the related footnotes and narrative accompanying the tables).

(4)
"ONE YEAR" as to the frequency with which the future advisory vote occurs on the compensation of our named executive officers.

Table of Contents

Q.
What is the voting requirement to approve each of the items?

A.

Summary
11
Environmental, Social and Governance Responsibility
The Board receives timely updates on any significant environmental or safety incidents as well as environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) briefings at regularly scheduled Board meetings. ESG matters at Vital are overseen by the Nominating, Corporate Governance, Environmental and Social (“NGE&S”) Committee, which monitors and evaluates programs and policies relating to ESG and climate-related matters on at least a quarterly basis. The NGE&S Committee holds primary responsibility for reviewing our ESG performance, including environmental, health or safety incidents, strategies and policies related to human capital management and our ESG risks and exposures, including climate-related risks. The NGE&S Committee members oversee ESG-related efforts across the Company, identify ESG risks and contribute to our ESG communications. Relatedly, one of the Audit Committee’s responsibilities is oversight of our Enterprise Risk Management process, including our cybersecurity practices. Our Chief Technology Officer, supported by our Chief Information Security Officer, briefs the Board on cybersecurity matters as needed during regularly scheduled Audit Committee meetings. Cybersecurity matters are also regularly discussed during full Board meetings.
Management of our daily ESG efforts is led by the ESG Management Committee, a multi-disciplined team of leaders who are responsible for implementing, executing and assessing new and ongoing ESG efforts across the organization. The NGE&S Committee’s recommendations provide key considerations for our operations and business strategy, and increase awareness of ESG matters throughout the organization. The Chief Sustainability Officer, who directly reports to the Chief Executive Officer, leads the NGE&S Committee and provides regular updates to the NGE&S Committee and Board. Progress toward our targets are overseen by the Board and ESG metrics are linked with executive officer compensation through inclusions of our 2025 emission reduction goals in the Company’s Long-Term Incentive Program.
Additional information on our ESG Management Committee, cybersecurity practices and key accomplishments can be found in our 2022 ESG & Climate Risk Report on our website under the “Sustainability” tab. The information on our website, including our ESG and Climate Risk Reports, is not incorporated by reference or otherwise made a part of this Proxy Statement.
Key Accomplishments Highlighted in the 2022 ESG & Climate Risk Report
Vital published our third annual ESG and Climate Risk Report in 2022, aligning our disclosures and metrics with SASB, TCFD and IPIECA frameworks and further increasing industry comparability through the AXPC and API performance metrics. The report outlines Vital’s continued progress toward our 2025 emissions reduction targets, includes a 1.5 degree net zero scenario analysis and highlights that Vital was the first Permian operator to achieve Trustwell™ Certification for responsible operation, the addition of a 2025 water recycling goal and a 2030 combined Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions intensity target. Key accomplishments include:
Progress Towards Environmental Targets

Item One—Election of directors

The persons receiving the highest number of "FOR" votes at the Annual Meeting will be elected. As a result, the two nominees for election as Class II directors and the one nominee for election
TargetsProgress relative to 2019 baseline:
< 12.5 mtCO2e / MBOE Scope 1 GHG emissions intensity by 2025
34% reduction in Scope 1 GHG emissions intensity
Zero routine flaring by 2025
62% reduction in flaring intensity
< 0.20% methane emissions as a Class III director who receive the greatest numberpercentage of votes will be elected directors. Abstentions, broker non-votes and withheld votes, if any, are not counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the outcome of this election.natural gas production by 2025
63% reduction in methane intensity




12

Item Two—Ratification of appointment of independent public accounting firm

To be approved by the stockholders, this item must receive the "FOR" vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal at the Annual Meeting. Broker non-votes, if any, will be counted as votes "FOR" this proposal. Abstentions, if any, have the same effect as votes against the matter.Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement


lpi-20230405_g44.jpg
Progress on Diversity & Inclusion
Guided by mutual respect, openness, honesty and a spirit of trust and collaboration, we support and encourage an inclusive work environment to attain our highest level of productivity, creativity and efficiency. Diverse and sound ideas, approaches and individual experiences are essential features of inclusion. While recognizing opportunities to continue to improve, we are proud of the progress the Company has made on improving diversity and inclusion across our Company over the past three years, including:
60% of our current Directors are diverse*
100% of new Directors since 2020 are diverse
40% of Company leadership are diverse
27% increase in the percentage of women in leadership since 2019
55% of employees in our Tulsa headquarters are women
Company-wide unconscious bias and inclusion training
Continued disclosure of our EEO-1 data
*The term “diverse” in this section includes gender or race


Summary
13
Stockholder Engagement
Our engagement with stockholders is ongoing throughout the year.

Item Three—Advisory vote approving

lpi-20230405_g45.jpg
lpi-20230405_g46.jpg
lpi-20230405_g47.jpg
SpringSummerFallWinter
In a typical year, we file our proxy statement in the Spring disclosing enhancements to our governance and compensation practices and policies based on the feedback received from stockholders the previous year. We then conduct outreach with stockholders prior to our annual meeting as needed.We review the feedback received from our Spring engagement and through the annual meeting stockholder voting results in the Summer.We conduct broad engagement with stockholders through the Fall and Winter to obtain feedback following the annual meeting. We also complete our annual Board assessments and annual review of our named executive officers

Board policies and charters.
To be approved byWe review the stockholders, this item must receivestockholder feedback from our stockholder outreach with the "FOR" vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal at the Annual Meeting. AbstentionsBoard and broker non-votes, if any, are not counted as votes castconsider potential changes to our compensation practices and will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal. The results of the votes on this Item Three are not binding on the board of directors, whether or not the resolution is passed under these voting standards.program, governance and sustainability practices and proxy disclosures.


We value stockholder feedback and believe that dialogue with our stockholders is a key element of good corporate governance. We conduct an extensive annual outreach program enabling investors to engage directly with members of our Board and senior leadership. Discussion topics include our corporate strategies and goals, Company performance, executive compensation, governance policies and practices and environmental and social matters. Over the course of fall 2022 and winter 2023, we reached out to stockholders representing more than 50% of our shares outstanding and held one or more meetings with all investors who accepted our invitation. A summary of key areas of feedback received during these conversations, which included senior members of management and either the chair of our Board or of the NGE&S Committee, follows. This feedback is shared with our Board and helps align our governance and compensation practices and disclosures with stockholder expectations.


14

Item Four—Advisory vote determining the frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of named executive officers

The frequency option (one, two or three years) receiving a majority of the votes cast will be the option selected by the stockholders. Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, are not counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal. The results of the votes on this Item Four are not binding on the board of directors, whether or not any resolution is passed under these voting standards.Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
Q.
What happens if additional matters are presented at the Annual Meeting?

A.
Other than the four items of business described in this Proxy Statement, we are not aware of any other business to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting. If you grant a proxy, the persons named as proxies will have the discretion to vote your shares on any additional matters properly presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting.

Q.
What happens if I do not give specific voting instructions?

A.
If you are a stockholder of record, and vote without giving specific voting instructions, the proxyholders will vote your shares in the manner recommended by our board of directors on all

Table of Contents

Q.
What is the quorum requirement for the Annual Meeting?

A.
A majority of the Company's outstanding shares as of the Record Date must be present, in person or by proxy, at the Annual Meeting in order to hold the Annual Meeting and conduct business. This is called a quorum. Your shares will be counted for purposes of determining if there is a quorum, whether representing votes for, against, withheld or abstained, if you:

are present and vote at the Annual Meeting; or

properly submit a proxy card or vote over the Internet or by telephone.
Q.
How can I change my vote after I return my proxy card?

A.
If you are a stockholder of record, there are three ways you can change your vote or revoke your proxy after you have sent in your proxy card.

First, you may send a written notice to Laredo Petroleum, Inc., c/o Corporate Secretary, 15 W. Sixth Street, Suite 900, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119, stating that you would like to revoke your proxy.

Second, you may complete and submit another valid proxy by mail, telephone or over the Internet that is later dated and if mailed, is properly signed, or if submitted by telephone or over the Internet is received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 16, 2018. Any earlier proxies will be revoked automatically.

Third, you may attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person. Any earlier proxy will be revoked. However, attending the Annual Meeting without voting in person will not revoke your proxy.

Table of Contents

Q.
Who will tabulate the votes?

A.
The board of directors has appointed our transfer agent, AST, to certify the tabulated vote and AST will have a representative to act as the independent inspector of elections for the Annual Meeting. AST will be responsible for (i) determining the presence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting, (ii) receiving all votes and ballots, whether by proxy or in person, with regard to all issues voted upon at the Annual Meeting, (iii) counting and tabulating all such votes and ballots and (iv) determining and reporting the results with regard to all such issues voted upon at the Annual Meeting.

Q.
Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?

A.
We intend to announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and publish final results in a Current Report on Form 8-K to be filed with the SEC within four business days following the Annual Meeting.

Q.
How can I obtain a separate set of proxy materials?

A.
We have adopted a procedure approved by the SEC known as "householding." Under this procedure, multiple stockholders residing at the same address have the convenience of receiving a single copy of our Annual Report and Proxy Statement, unless they have notified us that they want to continue receiving multiple copies. Householding allows us to reduce the environmental impact of providing proxy materials as well as printing and mailing costs.

If you received a householded mailing this year and you would like to have additional copies of the Annual Report and/or Proxy Statement mailed to you, or you would like to revoke your consent to the householding of documents, please submit your request to Laredo Petroleum, Inc., c/o Corporate Secretary, 15 W. Sixth Street, Suite 900, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119 or by calling (918) 513-4570.

Unfortunately, householding for bank and brokerage accounts is limited to accounts within the same bank or brokerage firm. For example, if you and your spouse each have an account containing our common stock at different brokerage firms, your household will receive two copies of our Annual Meeting materials—one from each brokerage firm. To reduce the number of duplicate sets of materials your household receives, you may wish to enroll some or all of your accounts in our electronic delivery program.

Q.
Who pays for the cost of this proxy solicitation?

A.
We will pay for the costs of the solicitation of proxies. We may reimburse brokerage firms and other persons for expenses incurred in forwarding the voting materials to their customers who are beneficial owners and obtaining their voting instructions. Laredo has retained the services of Georgeson LLC ("Georgeson") to aid in the solicitation of proxies from banks, brokers, nominees and intermediaries. Laredo will pay Georgeson a fee of $11,000 for its services, plus reasonable out of pocket expenses. In addition to soliciting proxies by mail, our board of directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies on our behalf, without additional compensation, personally or by telephone. Stockholders voting over the Internet should understand that there may be costs associated with electronic access, such as the usage charges from telephone companies and Internet access providers, that must be borne by the stockholder.

Q.
Is there a list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

A.
The names of stockholders of record entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available at the Annual Meeting and for 10 days prior to the Annual Meeting at our principal executive offices

Table of Contents

Q.
What is the deadline to propose actions for consideration at next year's annual meeting?

A.
Stockholders who, in accordance with Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), wish to present proposals for inclusion in the proxy materials to be distributed in connection with the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders, must submit their proposals so that they are received at our principal executive offices no later than the close of business on November 28, 2018, or, in the event the Company's 2019 annual meeting is advanced or delayed more than 30 days from the date of the Annual Meeting, within a reasonable time before the Company begins to print and mail the proxy materials for the 2019 annual meeting. As the SEC rules make clear, simply submitting a proposal does not guarantee that it will be included in the Company's proxy materials.

In addition, stockholders who wish to introduce a proposal from the floor of the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders (outside the processes of Rule 14a-8), must submit that proposal in writing to the Company's Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices no earlier than January 14, 2019 and no later than February 11, 2019, or, in the event the Company's 2019 annual meeting of stockholders is advanced or delayed more than 30 days from the date of the anniversary of the Annual Meeting, not later than the later of (i) the 90th day before the 2019 annual meeting or (ii) the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the 2019 annual meeting is first made by the Company.

To be in proper form, a stockholder's notice must be timely delivered to Laredo Petroleum, Inc., c/o Corporate Secretary, 15 W. Sixth Street, Suite 900, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119 and must include the information required by our Second Amended and Restated Bylaws (our "bylaws") with respect to each proposal submitted. The Company may refuse to consider any proposal that is not timely or otherwise fails to meet the requirements of our bylaws or the SEC's rules with respect to the submission of proposals.

You may obtain a copy of our bylaws by accessing our website (www.laredopetro.com) or submitting a request to Laredo Petroleum, Inc., c/o Corporate Secretary, 15 W. Sixth Street, Suite 900, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119.

Q.
How do I nominate a candidate for election as a director?

A.
Stockholders who wish to nominate a candidate for election as a director at our 2019 annual meeting must submit their nomination in writing to the Company's Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices no earlier than January 14, 2019 and no later than February 11, 2019, or, in the event the Company's 2019 annual meeting of stockholders is advanced or delayed more than 30 days from the date of the Annual Meeting, not later than the later of (i) the 90th day before the 2019 annual meeting or (ii) the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the 2019 annual meeting is first made by the Company.

In the event that the number of directors to be elected to the board of directors is increased and there has been no public announcement naming all of the nominees for director or indicating the increase made by the Company at least 10 days before the last day a stockholder may deliver a notice of nomination in accordance with the preceding sentence, a stockholder's notice will be considered timely, but only with respect to nominees for any new positions created by such increase, if it is received by the Corporate Secretary at the principal executive offices of the


Table of Contents

Q.
How can I communicate with the board of directors?

A.
Stockholders or other interested parties can contact any director, any committee of the board of directors, or the Company's non-management directors as a group, by writing to Laredo Petroleum, Inc., c/o Corporate Secretary, 15 W. Sixth Street, Suite 900, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119. Comments or complaints relating to the Company's accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters will also be referred to members of the audit committee of our board of directors (the "Audit Committee"). All such communications will be forwarded to the appropriate member(s) of the board of directors.

THIS QUESTION AND ANSWER SECTION IS ONLY MEANT TO GIVE AN OVERVIEW OF THE PROXY STATEMENT. FOR MORE INFORMATION, PLEASE REFER TO THE MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THE SUBSEQUENT PAGES.


Table of Contents


CORPORATE STRUCTURE

        Laredo Petroleum, Inc. is a Delaware corporation formed in 2011 for the purpose of merging with Laredo Petroleum, LLC (a Delaware limited liability company formed in 2007) to consummate an initial public offering of common stock in December 2011 (the "IPO"). Laredo Petroleum, Inc. was the survivor of such merger and currently has two wholly-owned subsidiaries, LMS, and Garden City Minerals, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("GCM").

        Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Proxy Statement to "Laredo," the "Company," "we," "our," "us," or similar terms refer to Laredo Petroleum, Inc. and its subsidiaries at the applicable time, including former subsidiaries and predecessor companies, as applicable.


Table of Contents


ITEM ONE

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

        In accordance with the provisions of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, our board of directors is divided into three classes, designated Class I, Class II and Class III, with each class serving staggered terms and thereafter until their successors are duly elected and qualified. The individuals listed below currently serve,or are being nominated to serve, as the directors in the class indicated with a term expiring at the corresponding annual meeting of stockholders. As a result, approximately one-third of the director positions will be elected at each annual meeting of stockholders.

Class II—With a term expiring 2021

James R. Levy

Dr. Myles W. Scoggins

Class III—With a term expiring 2019

Donald D. Wolf

B.Z. (Bill) Parker

Pamela S. Pierce

Class I—With a term expiring 2020

Randy A. Foutch

Peter R. Kagan

Edmund P. Segner, III

Nominees for Class II (with a term expiring in 2021) and for Class III (with a term expiring 2019)

        On the recommendation of the nominating and corporate governance committee of our board of directors (the "Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee"), the board of directors has nominated James R. Levy and Dr. Myles W. Scoggins for election to the board as Class II directors of the Company and Donald D. Wolf for election to the board as a Class III director of the Company, and recommends that each of them be re-elected to the board of directors to serve as Class II and Class III directors, as applicable. The board of directors recommends that James R. Levy and Dr. Myles W. Scoggins hold office until the 2021 annual meeting of stockholders and thereafter until each of their successors is elected and qualified or his earlier resignation or removal, and that Donald D. Wolf hold office until the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders. Mr. Wolf has previously served as a Class II director with Mr. Levy and Dr. Scoggins. However, our Corporate Governance Guidelines state that each non-employee director must retire at the annual meeting following his or her 75th birthday. Since Mr. Wolf is currently 74, the board of directors determined to nominate him for the one-year term expiring at the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders.

        The biographical information for all three director nominees and our other directors is contained in the "Directors" section below.

        Assuming the presence of a quorum, each of the three director nominees receiving the affirmative vote "FOR" of a plurality of the shares voted at the Annual Meeting will be elected. Cumulative voting is not permitted in the election of directors. The board of directors recommends that you vote "FOR" the election of each of the three nominees James R. Levy, Dr. Myles W. Scoggins and Donald D. Wolf.


Table of Contents

        Unless otherwise instructed, the proxyholders will vote the proxies received by them for the three nominees named above. The board of directors has no reason to believe that any of its nominees will be unable or unwilling to serve if elected. If a nominee becomes unable or unwilling to accept nomination or election, either the number of the Company's directors will be reduced or the proxyholders will vote for the election of a substitute nominee that the board of directors recommends.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTEFOR THE ELECTION OF EACH OF JAMES R. LEVY, DR. MYLES W. SCOGGINS AND DONALD D. WOLF.


Table of Contents


DIRECTORS

        After the Annual Meeting, assuming the stockholders elect the three nominees of the board of directors as set forth in "Item One—Election of Directors" above, the board of directors of the Company will be:

Directors
Name
AgePosition
Randy A. FoutchWhat We Heard66Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerOur Perspective/What We Did
Peter R. Kagan(1)49Director
James R. Levy(2)*While supportive of 2025 goals set and metrics disclosed to date, some investors encouraged additional disclosures and target-setting42DirectorWe again disclosed our estimated Scope 3 emissions for category 11 (use of products sold) using the IPIECA methodology in the 2022 ESG and Climate Risk Report; expanded our targets to include a combined Scopes 1 & 2 GHG emissions intensity reduction by 2030 and a 2025 water recycling target related to our completion operations
B.Z. (Bill) Parker(1)(3)70Director
Pamela S. Pierce(1)(2)(3)63Director
Dr. Myles W. Scoggins(1)(2)(3)*Several investors indicated support for disclosure aligned with SASB standards and TCFD framework, while acknowledging in some cases that the Board is best positioned to make framework determinations70DirectorWe continued to align our disclosure with SASB, TCFD and IPIECA reporting frameworks as well as AXPC and API performance metrics for our 2022 ESG and Climate Risk Report
Additional information regarding the Company’s risk identification and mitigation processes would be helpfulOur 2022 ESG and Climate Risk Report included enhanced disclosure regarding our process for prioritizing and allocating resources to manage risk as well as our risk mitigation efforts
Interests in our strategic planning around energy transition, carbon offsets and future capital allocationWe continue to make progress toward our 2025 and 2030 emissions reduction targets and direct capital toward emission reduction projects using our carbon abatement curve to focus our human and financial capital. Additionally, our 1.5 degree net zero scenario analysis demonstrated the resiliency of our development program, further solidifying our view that producing low cost, low carbon energy is a sustainable strategy
Investors expressed interest in discussing the use of ESG metrics in both short- and long-term incentive programs, noting metrics should be clearly defined, rather than discretionary goalsOur STIP has incorporated quantifiable environmental goals since 2020, and for 2022 and 2023 we have further refined those goals, which represent 20% of our STIP. In addition, our compensation committee has included an LTIP metric since 2022 tied to achievement of our 2025 emissions reduction goals
Investors are supportive of Vital’s diversity, equity and inclusion disclosures, including EEO-1 survey data, and encouraged continued focus in this areaWe seek opportunities for improved practices and disclosure in the future


Summary15
Executive Compensation Matters Overview
The Board establishes the Company’s compensation philosophy and practices and annually reviews and updates the executive compensation program based upon recommendations from the Compensation Committee. The process includes reviewing the prior year say-on-pay voting results, soliciting input from the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, reflecting on all feedback received from stockholders throughout the year, comparing the Company’s compensation program with its peers and evaluating the Company and management team’s performance.
General best practices that the Board and Compensation Committee have implemented include the following:
What We Don’t Do
No Repricing of Stock Options
We do not reprice, exchange or buy out underwater stock options.
No Employment Agreements
None of our employees, including our named executive officers (“NEOs”), have an employment agreement, and all executive compensation is determined by the Compensation Committee and the Board.
No Payment of Dividend Equivalents on
Unvested Equity
We do not issue dividends for unvested equity.
No Excise Tax Gross Ups
Our Change in Control Plan does not provide for any excise tax gross ups.
No Pledging, Hedging, Short Sales or
Derivative Transactions
Our policies prohibit directors and employees from pledging, hedging, short-selling or trading in derivatives of our stock.


16Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
What We Do
Pay For Performance
Our compensation program aligns executive compensation with corporate performance on both a short-term and long-term basis by making our incentive compensation variable and heavily dependent on performance metrics.
Benchmark Compensation Against
a Representative & Relevant Peer Group
With the assistance of our independent compensation consultant, we annually benchmark our compensation structure against a compensation peer group. We annually review the peer group to consider additions and removals based on multiple factors, including EBITDA, total assets, market capitalization, enterprise value and total shareholder return.
Perform An Annual Review
of Compensation Structure
The Compensation Committee performs an annual risk assessment to confirm our compensation structure does not encourage unnecessary risk taking.
Double Trigger Change in
Control for Severance Payments
Severance payments in the event of a change in control require both a change in control and an actual or constructive termination of the position without cause.
Double Trigger Change in Control
for Equity Awards
Accelerated vesting of equity awards in the event of a change in control require both a change in control and an actual or constructive termination of the position without cause.
Maintain Robust Equity Ownership Guidelines
for Executives and Board Of Directors
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require executives to own stock and/or have an interest in restricted stock units valued at a multiple of base salary and directors to own $400,000 worth of Company stock.
Total Target Compensation for 2022
% of Pay at Risk
CEO
87%
lpi-20230405_g48.jpg
Average of
the other NEOs
81%
lpi-20230405_g49.jpg
Publish Pre-Established Performance Goals &
Fully Disclose Results
Both our long-term and short-term incentive compensation have significant performance-based criteria that are subject to the achievement of objective, pre-established performance goals disclosed in our proxy materials and tied to financial, operational and strategic objectives.
Executive Clawback Plan
Beginning with all award grants made on or after January 1, 2022, our executives are subject to a robust clawback plan in the case of financial restatement or other circumstances as determined by the Board.
Gather, Analyze and Respond to Stockholder
Feedback on Our Compensation Structure
We annually ask stockholders to vote on an advisory basis to approve our executive compensation (say-on-pay) and are highly responsive to stockholders. We received approximately 95% approval for our 2022 vote.
Limit Performance Unit Payouts
Performance unit award payouts are capped, and we prohibit maximum performance unit award payout in the event of a negative total shareholder return.
Utilize an Independent Compensation Consultant
The Compensation Committee utilizes an independent compensation consultant in making compensation policy.
Stock Ownership Requirements
Multiple of Base Salary
CEOSenior
Vice Presidents
Vice
Presidents
Directors
5x2x1x$400,000


17
Corporate Governance
and Board Matters
Proposal One
Election of Directors at the 2023 Annual Meeting
The Board is divided into three classes, designated Class I, Class II and Class III. Each class serves a staggered three-year term. As a result, typically approximately one third of the director positions are subject to election at each annual meeting of stockholders.
The NGE&S Committee recommends, and the Board has nominated, five directors for re-election to the Board to serve until the applicable annual meeting of stockholders and thereafter until each of their successors is elected and qualified or his or her earlier resignation or removal. In accordance with good governance practices, newly appointed directors are placed in the class up for election at the next annual meeting. After the Annual Meeting, assuming stockholders elect the five nominees of the Board, the Board of Directors will be as follows:
CLASS I
With a term expiring in 2026
Dr. Craig M. Jarchow
Jason Pigott
Edmund P. Segner, III(1)(3)III
Dr. Shihab Kuran
CLASS II
With a term expiring in 2024
Jarvis V. Hollingsworth
Lisa M. Lambert
Lori A. Lancaster
CLASS III
With a term expiring in 2025
William E. Albrecht
Frances Powell Hawes
John Driver

64Director
Donald D. Wolf(1)(2)(3)*74
The biographical information for director nominees and our other directors and the process for reviewing and selecting nominees is set forth below in the Director Qualifications section.
The Company Bylaws provide for a majority voting standard for uncontested director elections and require roughly equal classes of directors. Assuming the presence of a quorum, each of the director nominees receiving affirmative votes of a majority of the shares voted at the Annual Meeting will be elected. Cumulative voting is not permitted in the election of directors. Unless otherwise instructed, the proxyholders will vote the proxies received by them for the five nominees.
Each of the nominated directors has consented to serve on the Board, and the Board has no reason to believe any nominees will be unable or unwilling to serve if elected. If a nominee becomes unable or unwilling to accept nomination or election, either the number of the Company’s directors will be reduced or the proxyholders will vote for the election of a substitute nominee that the Board recommends.
lpi-20230405_g50.jpg
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR the election of each of Dr. Craig M. Jarchow, Jason Pigott, Edmund P. Segner, III, John Driver and Dr. Shihab Kuran.


(1)
Member

18Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
Director Qualifications
The Board seeks to recruit and nominate directors who provide the Board with the necessary skills, backgrounds and experience to oversee the Company’s policies and strategies and the management of the Nominatingbusiness by the CEO and other executive officers. The NGE&S Committee annually reviews the composition of the Board and evaluates its effectiveness and regularly evaluates potential director candidates. For each director nominee, the Board considers, at a minimum, a candidate’s judgment, experience, character, business acumen and independence from the Company. Additionally, in accordance with the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board considers diversity of experience, gender, race, ethnicity and age, as well as any other self-identified diversity characteristics of directors and candidates to becomes directors. The Board and the NGE&S Committee

(2)
Member conduct an annual review to assess the effectiveness of the Compensation Committee

(3)
Memberpolicy in light of the Audit Committee

        Our board of directors currently consists of eight members, each serving a three-year term that expires on the dateskills and characteristics of the corresponding annual meetingcurrent Board members. When evaluating the suitability of an incumbent director for re-election, the Board and NGE&S Committee also consider the director’s past performance, including attendance at meetings and contributions to the Board.

Director nominees come from a variety of sources, including stockholders except(who may nominate directors in accordance with the Company Bylaws), management, directors and search firms. The NGE&S Committee has retained independent, third-party search firms to assist in identifying and evaluating potential candidates for Donald D. Wolf, who, if elected, will servethe Board. The NGE&S Committee evaluates and interviews all potential candidates and recommends nominees to the Board. The full Board then votes to appoint a one-year term that expires onnominee by majority vote and recommends the date ofnominee for election by stockholders at the next annual meetingmeeting.
The Board and the NGE&S Committee periodically review the size of the stockholders.

Board to ensure it is appropriate, consistent with our historical approach and in accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

Our current Board members range in age from 49 to 71, with three women members and four racially diverse members. Our Board also has directors with backgrounds in different industries, areas of expertise, age and tenure. We have undergone an extensive refresh of the Board resulting in 90% of directors being new in the last 5 years, we have targeted high quality individuals who provide a diverse and varied perspective across all aspects of experience. We believe this Board aligns with and supports the new direction the Company has taken during this period and believe they will continue to aid in our future growth.
IndependentDiversityAge
Range
Average
Tenure
Average
Age
All
Directors
except CEO
30%*
Women
40%*
Minority
49-71
Years
3.1
Years
60
Years
*Based upon all 10 Directors
Set forth below is biographical information about each of our nominees and the continuing directors as of March 15, 2018.28, 2023 for each director nominee and continuing director.


Corporate Governance and Board Matters19
Class I Director Nominees
lpi-20230405_g51.jpg
Edmund P. Segner, III
Former President, Chief of Staff, Principal Financial Officer and Director, EOG Resources, Inc.
Independent Director
Director since 2011
Age 69
Committees
Audit
Finance
Career Highlights
Rice University
Professor in the Practice of Engineering Management, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
EOG Resources, Inc.
President, Chief of Staff and Director
Principal Financial Officer
Key Qualifications and Experience
Mr. Segner’s service as President, Principal Financial Officer and director of publicly traded oil and gas exploration and development companies demonstrates a strong operational, financial, accounting and strategic background and enables him to provide our Board with valuable business, leadership and management experience and insights into many aspects of the operations of exploration and production. Mr. Segner also brings financial and accounting expertise to the Board, including through his experience in financing transactions for oil and gas companies, his background as a certified public accountant, his service as a Principal Financial Officer, his supervision of other principal financial officers and principal accounting officers and his service on the audit committees of other companies. For these reasons, among others, we believe Mr. Segner is qualified to serve as a director.
Other Current Public Company Directorships
Archrock, Inc.
(Audit Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee)
Prior Directorships
HighPoint Resources Corp. (formerly Bill Barrett Corp.)
Archrock Partners, L.P. (formerly Exterran Partners, L.P.) 
Midcoast Holdings, LLC, the general partner of Midcoast Energy Partners, L.P.
Seahawk Drilling, Inc.
Education
Certified Public Accountant
MA, Economics, University of Houston
BS, Civil Engineering, Rice University


20Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
lpi-20230405_g52.jpg
Dr. Craig M. Jarchow
President, CEO, TG Natural Resources, LLC
Independent Director
Director since 2019
Age 62
Committees
Compensation (Chair)
Finance
Career Highlights
TG Natural Resources, LLC
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(May 2017 present)
Pine Brook Road Partners, LLC
Managing Director and Partner
First Reserve Corporation
Director and Partner
Amoco Corporation & Apache Corporation
Operational roles of increasing responsibility
Key Qualifications and Experience
Dr. Jarchow has more than 30 years of industry experience serving in upstream operational roles for oil and gas companies, advising financial services firms on energy focused investments and building and leading an operating company. His geology and geophysics background combined with his managerial experience building and leading a company aides us in the development of our assets and the acquisition of new properties to expand our high margin inventory. For these reasons, among others, we believe Dr. Jarchow is qualified to serve as a director.
Other Current Public Company Directorships
TG Natural
Resources, LLC
Education
Ph.D., Geophysics, Stanford University
MBA, MIT Sloan School of Management
MS, Geophysics, Stanford University
BA, Geology, University of California, Santa Barbara
lpi-20230405_g53.jpg
Jason Pigott
President and Chief Executive Officer, Vital Energy, Inc.
Director since May 2019
Age 49
Career Highlights
Vital Energy, Inc.
President and Chief Executive Officer, October 2019 to present Director and President
Chesapeake Energy Corporation
Executive Vice President—Operations and Technical Services Executive Vice President, Operations
Senior Vice President, Operations
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation
General Manager
Reservoir Engineering Manager
Key Qualifications and Experience
Mr. Pigott has more than 23 years of experience in the energy exploration and production industry. Before joining Vital, he served as Executive Vice President—Operations and Technical Services for Chesapeake Energy Corporation where he led all drilling and completions operations, digital operations, supply chain and land efforts. Prior to joining Chesapeake in 2013, he was with Anadarko Petroleum for 14 years, serving in positions of increasing responsibility, focused primarily on onshore unconventional play development in the Eagle Ford Shale, Haynesville Shale, Delaware Basin and various tightsand plays in East Texas. Mr. Pigott’s extensive background in leading multidisciplinary operational and technical organizations, as well as experience contributing to executive level strategic decisions, contributes significant value to our Board of Directors. For these reasons, among others, we believe Mr. Pigott is qualified to serve as director.
Other Current Public Company Boards
None
Education
MBA, University of North Carolina
BS, Petroleum Engineering, Texas A&M University


Corporate Governance and Board Matters21
lpi-20230405_g54.jpg
Dr. Shihab Kuran
Chief Executive Officer, and Founder of Power Edison
Founder and
Executive Chairman of
EV Edison
Independent Director
Director since June 2022
Age 53
Committees
Compensation, NGE&S
Career Highlights 
Power Edison
Chief Executive Officer and Founder
EV Edison
Executive Chairman and Founder
NRG Energy
President of Strategic Development
Sun Edison
President, Advanced Solutions
Petra Solar
Founder, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
Key Qualifications and Experience
Dr. Kuran is NACD Directorship Certified™. He is an investor, serial entrepreneur and an executive with over three decades of experience in the technology and energy sectors. He is a proven leader in the energy transition space with a global track record in the development and scaling of advanced energy technologies, including solar, smart grid, energy storage and Electric Vehicle (“EV”) charging. He developed and deployed marque energy transition projects with international Oil and Gas companies. He is currently Chief Executive Officer and founder of Power Edison, a company focused on providing innovative mobile energy storage solutions for the grid. Dr. Kuran is the founder and Executive Chairman of EV Edison, a company focused on the development of large scale EV charging hubs. Dr. Kuran served as President of Strategic Development at NRG Energy and President of Advanced Solutions at SunEdison. Previously he founded Petra Solar, a pioneer of smart solar, combining solar energy and smart grid technologies, and developer of the world’s largest solar electric project in 2009, and served as Director, President and Chief Executive Officer. Prior to Petra Solar he served in various executive leadership capacities in the technology sector. For these reasons, among others, we believe Dr. Kuran is qualified to serve as a director.
Other Current Public Company Directorships
NN, Inc.
Other Current Engagements
Advisory Board for Charles Edison Fund
Advisory Board for Edison Innovation Foundation
Education
Ph.D., M.Sc., Electrical Engineering, City University of New York
B.Sc. Electrical Engineering, University of Jordan
The General Manager Program (TGMP), Harvard Business School
Directorship Certified, National Association of Corporate Directors
Digital Directors Network 502 Systemic Cyber Risk Goveranace For U.S. Company Corporate Directors


22Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
Class III Director Nominees
lpi-20230405_g55.jpg
John Driver
Chief Executive Officer,
Lynx Technology
Independent Director
Director since June 2022
Age 58
Committees
Audit, Finance
Career Highlights 
Lynx Technology
Chief Executive Officer
PacketVideo
Chief Operating Officer and Chief Marketing Officer
JoynIn
Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer
Serena Software
Senior Director of Global Field Marketing
Sun Microsystems
Group Manager of Field and Partner Marketing
Key Qualifications and Experience
Mr. Driver is a technology entrepreneur and innovator with leadership experience in large, public and privately- held multinational companies and early-stage startups. He has a foundation in software marketing and sales and direct experience in new product launches for first-to-market categories. Navigating complexity, delivering innovation, and creating new opportunities within the IoT (Internet of Things) market are hallmarks of his career. As CEO, he currently leads Lynx Technology, a digital media technology company he founded through a management buyout of the multinational Connected Home operations of PacketVideo, a subsidiary of NTT DOCOMO. Previously, Mr. Driver served as Chief Operating Officer and Chief Marketing Officer of PacketVideo, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer of JoynIn and in senior leadership roles for Serena Software and Sun Microsystems.
For these reasons, among others, we believe Mr. Driver is qualified to serve as a director.
Other Current Public Company Directorships
Independent Director, Broadway
Financial Corp (Audit, Governance, Risk & Compliance Committees)
Other Current Engagements
The Fleet Science Center, Board Chair
Education
MBA, Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College
BS, Industrial Engineering, Stanford University
Directorship Certified, National Association of Corporate Directors
Cybersecurity Oversight Certified, National Association of Corporate Directors


Corporate Governance and Board Matters23
Continuing Class III Directors
lpi-20230405_g56.jpg
William E. Albrecht
President, Moncrief Energy, LLC
Non-Executive Chairman Independent Director
Director since Feb. 2020 Age 71
Committees
Compensation
Finance
Career Highlights 
California Resources Corporation
Non-Executive Chair of the Board
Occidental Petroleum Corporation
Vice President
President, Oxy Oil & Gas, Americas
President, Oxy Oil & Gas, USA
EOG Resources, Inc.
Executive Officer
Tenneco Oil Company
Petroleum Engineer
Key Qualifications and Experience
Mr. Albrecht has more than 40 years of experience in the domestic oil and gas industry. His engineering background provides him with the ability to fully comprehend, analyze and offer insights on the wide variety of technically challenging projects facing us as we develop our shale-play assets. In addition, his service in a variety of executive positions for oil and gas companies and as a director for large public companies brings extensive managerial and operational experience of upstream assets to our Board. For these reasons, among others, we believe Mr. Albrecht is qualified to serve as a director.
Other Current Public Company Directorships
Halliburton Company (Compensation Committee and Health, Safety and Environment Committee)
Prior Directorships
California Resources Corporation (Non-Executive Chair of the Board)
Rowan Companies, plc (Non-Executive Chair of the Board)
Valaris, plc (Lead Independent Director)
Education
Directorship Certified, National Association of Corporate Directors
Board Leadership Fellow, National Association of Corporate Directors
MS, University of Southern California
BS, United States Military Academy at West Point


24Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
lpi-20230405_g57.jpg
Frances Powell Hawes
Former Chief Financial Officer, Grant Prideco, Inc.
Independent Director
Director since December 2018
Age 68
Committees
Audit (Chair)
NGE&S
Career Highlights 
New Process Steel, L.P.
Chief Financial Officer
American Electric Technologies, Inc.
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
NCI Building Systems, Inc.
Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and Treasurer
Grant Prideco, Inc.
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Weatherford International Ltd.
Various positions of increasing responsibility, including Chief Accounting Officer, Vice President, Accounting and Controller
Key Qualifications and Experience
Ms. Powell Hawes has over 22 years of experience as a financial advisor and chief financial officer for both public and privately held companies. She is a highly experienced director with extensive knowledge of not only publicly traded energy companies, but also privately held companies in complementary markets. Her knowledge and management experience on the Audit Committee enhances the Board of Directors’ decision-making process on all issues affecting the Company, and her strong accounting and leadership background contributes significantly to the Board’s understanding of the Company’s strategic opportunities. For these reasons, among others, we believe Ms. Powell Hawes is qualified to serve as a director.
Other Current Public Company Directorships
Archrock Inc. (Audit Committee chair and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee)
PGT Innovations, Inc. (Audit Committee)
Other Current Engagements
Financial Executives International, Houston Chapter
Prior Directorships
Energen Corporation
Express Energy Services, LLC
Education
Texas-Certified Public Accountant
Strategic Financial Leadership Program in Executive Education, Dartmouth College 
Director Professionalism Course, National Association of Corporate Directors
BBA, Accounting, University of Houston
CERT Certificate of Cybersecurity Oversight, Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute


Corporate Governance and Board Matters25
Continuing Class II Directors
lpi-20230405_g58.jpg
Jarvis V. Hollingsworth
Vice Chairman And Chief Operating Officer, Irradiant Partners L.P.
Independent Director
Director since Nov. 2020
Age 60
Committees
Audit
NGE&S (Chair)
Career Highlights 
Irradiant Partners, L.P.
Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer
Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors, L.P.
Secretary/General Counsel
Executive Committee and Board of Directors
Bracewell, LLP
Partner
Management and Finance Committees
Key Qualifications and Experience
Mr. Hollingsworth’s service as General Counsel and Director of a leading alternatives investment advisor with approximately $7 billion in assets and service as Board Chairman for a Texas state agency that manages a $175 billion-plus pension fund highlight the legal and financial background that he brings to our Board. Mr. Hollingsworth is a former Partner at the law firm Bracewell LLP in Houston, Texas where he had a fiduciary practice counseling boards of directors and trustees on corporate governance and strategic matters. His legal, management and governance experience contribute significantly to our Board and our move to include ESG initiatives as part of the NGE&S Committee. For these reasons, among others, we believe Mr. Hollingsworth is qualified to serve as a director.
Other Current Public Company Directorships
Core Scientific, Inc.
Other Current Engagements
Teacher Retirement System of Texas, Board Chairman
Memorial Hermann Hospital System, Finance Committee
Prior Directorships
Frost Bank (Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.)
Emergent Technologies, Inc.
Education
JD, University of Houston
BS, United States Military Academy at West Point


26Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
lpi-20230405_g59.jpg
Lisa M. Lambert
Founder And President, National Grid Partners
Independent Director
Director since Aug. 2020
Age 55
Committees
NGE&S
Compensation
Career Highlights
National Grid Partners
Founder and President
National Grid
Chief Technology and Innovation Officer
The Westly Group
Managing Partner
Intel Corporation
Managing Director, Software and Services Fund
and Diversity Fund
Key Qualifications and Experience
Ms. Lambert has extensive experience in the technology industry, leading innovation efforts and global investment initiatives. Her work with National Grid focuses on advancing energy systems, including at the intersection of energy and emerging technology to create a smarter, renewable future. She brings a perspective to our Board that contributes to our strategy of fostering a digital first mindset to make our business thrive in a digital era and to our continued commitment to ESG. For these reasons, among others, we believe Ms. Lambert is qualified to serve as a director.
Other Current Engagements
UPWARD, CEO and Chairman, a non-profit global network of executive women
UL Incorporated, Director
Pathr, Director
Prior Directorships
National Venture
Capital Association
Education
MBA, Harvard Business School
BS, Management Information Systems, Pennsylvania State University
lpi-20230405_g60.jpg
Lori A. Lancaster
Former Managing Director, UBS Securities, Global Energy Group
Independent Director
Director since Nov. 2020
Age 53
Committees
Audit
Finance (Chair)
Career Highlights
UBS Securities
Managing Director in the Global Energy Group
Goldman, Sachs & Co.
Managing Director in the Global Natural Resources Group
Nomura Securities
Managing Director in the Global Natural Resources Group
Key Qualifications and Experience
Ms. Lancaster has extensive experience in the oil and gas sector and in particular finance. During her 18-year tenure in investment banking, she led or was a key member of the execution team on more than $60 billion of announced energy merger and acquisition deals and led the structuring and execution of numerous capital markets transactions. Her wealth of knowledge in financing and structuring deals is key as we execute on our strategies to expand our high-margin drilling inventory through acquisitions and reduce our leverage. Additionally, she brings public company audit committee and nominating and corporate governance experience to our team. For these reasons, among others, we believe Ms. Lancaster is qualified to serve as a director.
Other Current Public Company Directorships
Precision Drilling
Intrepid Potash
Prior Directorships
Energen Corporation
HighPoint Resources Corp. (formerly Bill Barrett Corp.)
Education
MBA, University of Chicago
BS, Texas Christian University


Corporate Governance and Board Matters27
Director Leadership
The Board believes that separating the roles of Chair and CEO and making the Board Chair an independent director provides further accountability by optimizing the Board’s processes, ability to constructively challenge management and appropriately prioritize matters.
The Chair facilitates the Board’s business and activities as follows:
Board Chair Responsibilities
Propose a quarterly schedule of major Board discussions items
Approve the agenda, schedule and information sent to directors prior to Board meetings
Chair all Board meetings
Lead executive sessions of the Board without management present (unless invited)
Call additional Board or independent director meetings
Guide the Board’s governance processes
Oversee the Board’s evaluations and CEO evaluation
Serve as liaison between CEO and management and the other independent directors
Advise the NGE&S Committee in choosing Committee chairs and membership
Be available for direct communication with stockholders as appropriate
The Board believes that the decision as to who should serve as Board Chair and CEO is the proper responsibility of the Board, and the Board will continue to carefully consider whether to combine or separate the roles of Chair and CEO in the future. At the present time, the Board believes the interests of all stockholders are best served through a leadership model that separates the independent Board Chair and CEO position.
Director Independence
The Board has determined that each continuing director and director nominee, except Mr. Pigott, meets the standards of independence set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the NYSE Listed Company Manual.
Independence*
Our CEO
lpi-20230405_g61.jpg
90%
Independent
William E. Albrecht
Frances Powell Hawes
Jarvis V. Hollingsworth
Dr. Craig M. Jarchow
Lisa M. Lambert
Lori A. Lancaster
Edmund P. Segner, III
John Driver
Dr. Shihab Kuran
Jason Pigott
*      Indicates Nominees for Election.

Randy A. Foutch is Laredo's founderReflects the anticipated Board composition at the conclusion of the Annual Meeting, assuming stockholders elect all nominees to the Board.

To make this determination, the Board considers all relevant facts and circumstances indicating whether a director has a material relationship with the Company, either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that does business with the Company. Material relationships can include commercial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable and familial relationships.
Independence
Evaluation
lpi-20230405_g62.jpg
Initial
Assessment
lpi-20230405_g62.jpg
Annual
Questionnaire
lpi-20230405_g62.jpg
Quarterly
Affirmation
lpi-20230405_g62.jpg
Ongoing
Disclosure
Requirements


28Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
Annually, each director must complete a questionnaire to disclose, among other things, information regarding ownership in the Company, compensation received from the Company (if any) and any relationship a director has either directly or indirectly through a family member or otherwise with certain Board or Company advisors or other companies with whom Vital does business. Additionally, each director must disclose at each regularly scheduled Board meeting, and has servedan affirmative obligation to promptly inform the Company’s General Counsel of, changes in circumstances or transactions or relationships that could impact his or her designation by the Board as Laredo's Chairmanindependent. During its assessment, the Board considered the following directorships and Chief Executive Officertransactions for director independence in 2022:
DirectorsOrganization/
Individual
RelationshipTransactionAmount for each of the
last three years
All DirectorsVarious charitable
organizations
Director or TrusteeCharitable
donations by Vital
<1% of the
Company’s revenues
*      The Board concluded all of the above listed matters fall below the relevant thresholds for independence set forth in the NYSE Listed Company Manual and the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines.
Director Compensation
All independent directors receive both an annual retainer and an annual fee (together the “Director Base Compensation”) for their service on the Vital Board totaling $230,000. The Company pays the Director Base Compensation ratably following each regularly scheduled quarterly Board meeting for services provided since that time. Hethe previous Board meeting. Directors are required to take at least $130,000 of their Director Base Compensation in the form of Company common stock. The director stock awards vest immediately. We implemented this structure, in part, to provide the directors the cash needed to pay taxes on the stock component of the Director Base Compensation. The Company also servedreimburses independent directors for their expenses to attend Board meetings.
The below table sets forth the Director Base Compensation effective as Laredo's President from October 2006of August 2021 and the compensation going forward. No changes to July 2008. Mr. Foutch hasdirector compensation were made in 2022.
Amount PaidTerms of Payment
Retainer$72,000 Paid ratably following each regularly scheduled quarterly Board meeting.
Director Fees$158,000 Paid ratably following each regularly scheduled quarterly Board meeting, with $130,000 paid in stock and $28,000 paid in cash.
Expense ReimbursementVariesThe Company reimburses non-employee directors for their expenses to attend board meetings.
Directors are also permitted to participate in our Charitable Matching Gift Program, which provides a Company match for up to $1,000 in donations to an approved charity.


Corporate Governance and Board Matters29
Directors who performed additional leadership roles, received the following compensation:
Amount PaidTerms of Payment
Non-Executive Board Chair$100,000 Paid in 70% cash and 30% stock ratably following each regularly scheduled Board meeting.
Audit Committee Chair$20,000 Paid in cash ratably following each regularly scheduled Board meeting.
Compensation Committee Chair$20,000 Paid in cash ratably following each regularly scheduled Board meeting.
NGE&S Chair$20,000 Paid in cash ratably following each regularly scheduled Board meeting.
Finance Committee Chair$20,000 Paid in cash ratably following each regularly scheduled Board meeting.
To determine our director compensation, the Compensation Committee reviewed a market-based analysis and consulted with its independent compensation consultant. The independent compensation consultant performed a competitive review of outside director compensation paid by our peers, which included consideration of the significant time commitment our Board provides to the Company. The Company’s Equity Incentive Plan prohibits granting a stock award to any individual in a given year of more than 33 years of experience in the oil and gas industry. Prior71,750 shares, which also applies to our formation, directors.
The following table summarizes the compensation earned by our non-employee directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022:
Name
Fees earned or paid in cash(1)
Stock
awards
(1)(2)
Deferred stock
awards
(1)(2)(3)
All other
Compensation
(4)
Total
William E. Albrecht$169,818 $— $160,182 $1,000 $331,000 
John Driver(5)
$72,006 $61,421 $32,529 $— $165,956 
Frances Powell Hawes$119,826 $16,265 $113,909 $— $250,000 
Jarvis V. Hollingsworth$119,826 $97,645 $32,529 $— $250,000 
Dr. Craig M. Jarchow$119,826 $— $130,174 $— $250,000 
Dr. Shihab Kuran(5)
$72,006 $61,421 $32,529 $— $165,956 
Lisa M. Lambert$99,826 $130,174 $— $— $230,000 
Lori A. Lancaster$119,826 $— $130,174 $— $250,000 
Edmund P. Segner, III$99,826 $— $130,174 $— $230,000 
Pamela S. Pierce(6)
$24,979 $32,521 $— $1,000 $58,500 
(1)The amounts reported are for compensation earned for services rendered for 2022, which include compensation earned for services rendered for the fourth quarter of 2022 that was paid during the first quarter of 2023 in accordance with the fee summary noted above.
(2)The amounts reported represent the aggregate grant-date fair value of stock awards granted to Vital’s non-employee independent directors, based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the grant date, in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718.
(3)The amounts reported represent deferred stock compensation received pursuant to the Director Deferred Compensation Plan (defined below).
(4)The amounts reported represent amounts donated by the Company under our Charitable Matching Gift Program.
(5)Mr. Foutch founded Latigo Petroleum, Inc. ("Latigo") in 2001Driver and served as its President and Chief Executive Officer until it was sold to Pogo Producing Co. in May 2006. Previous to Latigo, Mr. Foutch founded Lariat Petroleum, Inc. ("Lariat") in 1996 and served as its President until January 2001 when it was sold to Newfield Exploration Co. He is currently serving onDr. Kuran joined the board of directors effective June 24, 2022.
(6)Ms. Pierce resigned as director of Helmerich & Payne,the Company and from all committees of the Board on which she served effective May 26, 2022.


30Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
Directors who are also employees of the Company do not receive any additional compensation for serving on our Board. See our Summary Compensation Table for the total compensation received by Jason Pigott in 2022.
On February 25, 2021, the Board adopted the Vital Energy, Inc. (where heNonqualified Director Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Director Deferred Compensation Plan”), an unfunded nonqualified deferred compensation plan administered by the Compensation Committee. Pursuant to the Director Deferred Compensation Plan, non-employee directors may elect to defer some or all of any cash or stock compensation received. Cash deferrals are invested in an array of investment options as designated by the Compensation Committee’s designee the Vital Energy 401k Administration Committee, and stock is credited to the participant’s deferred stock account as of the date the stock would otherwise have been granted. Distributions will be paid in cash, unless the Compensation Committee approves payment in stock. At this time, only non-employee directors are eligible to participate. Directors were eligible to begin deferrals starting with compensation awarded after the Board meeting in May 2021.
Director Stock Ownership
Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, directors have five years from their appointment date to reach the following stock ownership guidelines:
PositionStock ownership requirement
Directors$400,000 worth of company stock
Based on stock ownership as of December 31, 2022 and the highest closing price of our common stock since January 1, 2023 $57.64, the following recently appointed directors have not yet reached the stock ownership requirement: Mr. Driver, Mr. Hollingsworth, Ms. Lambert, Ms. Lancaster and Dr. Kuran. All other directors have satisfied our stock ownership guidelines.
Director Oversight of Risk
A key oversight responsibility of the Board is overseeing the assessment and management of the Company’s exposure to various risks. Our enterprise risk management (ERM) is a member of its auditdynamic process to identify, assess, prioritize and nominatingmitigate the Company’s most significant enterprise risks and corporate governance committees). Mr. Foutch is also a memberuncertainties that could materially impact the long-term health of the National Petroleum Council andCompany or prevent the Advisory Councilachievement of strategic objectives. Our ERM process is an iterative exercise consisting of the Energy Institute at the Universityfollowing steps:
1.Identify risks – develop rating criteria (e.g., impact, velocity, likelihood) and identify key risks
2.Assess and prioritize risks – validate and assess current list of Texas, Austin. From 2013 until his resignation in June 2015, he servedrisks by gathering internal and external insights on drivers/root causes
3.Mitigate – based on the boardassessment and prioritization of directorsthe risks a mitigation plan is developed
4.Monitor and report – monitor and evaluate effectiveness of Cheniere Energy, Inc. From 2006risk mitigation and Key Risk Indicators (KRIs); report quarterly to August 2011, he served on the board of directors of Bill Barrett Corporationexecutives and from 2006 to 2008, on the board of directors of MacroSolve, Inc. Mr. Foutch also serves on the University of Tulsa Board of Trustees
5.Integrate – discuss plans with third-parties and several nonprofit and private industry boards. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Geology from the University of Texas and a Master of Science in Petroleum Engineering from the University of Houston.

        Mr. Foutch has been successful in founding and operating other oil and gas companies and has served as a director of various other companies in and associated with the oil and natural gas industry. Mr. Foutch's background provides a strongembed risks into operational and strategic knowledge base and valuable business, leadership and management experience, providing insights into many aspectsplanning

Our Director of the operations of exploration, production and transportation of oil and natural gas. Mr. Foutch also brings financial expertiseInternal Audit, who functionally reports to the board of directors, including his experience in capital market transactions related to oil and natural gas companies. For these reasons, we believe Mr. Foutch is qualified to serve asAudit Committee Chair, facilitates the ERM program. We leverage a director.


Table of Contents

Peter R. Kagan has served as onecombination of our directors since July 2007. He has beenquarterly and annual internal ERM efforts and regular engagement with Warburg Pincus LLC ("Warburg Pincus") since 1997 where he leadsour stakeholders to understand and focus on issues of material significance to both Vital Energy and our stakeholders. Once potential risks are identified, we conduct appropriate analyses for each of our potential key risks, including stress tests for financial, operational and strategic business risks. We also monitor the firm's investment activities in energylegislative environment and natural resources. He is a Partner of Warburg Pincus & Co. and a Managing Director of Warburg Pincus. He is also a member of Warburg Pincus' Executive Management Group. Mr. Kagan is currently on the board of directors of AAG Energy Holdings Ltd. (formerly Asian American Gas Ltd.), Antero Resources Corporation (where he serves as the lead director for theregulatory developments to identify any pending matters that may impact our business. Our ERM process continues to evolve to reflect our sector’s dynamic risk landscape.



Corporate Governance and Board Matters31

Governance Documents
Our governance and nominating committee), Antero Midstream Partners LP, ATX Resources, Brigham Minerals LLC ("Brigham Minerals"), Canbriam Energy Inc. (where he serves on the human resources committee), Delonex Energy, Navitas Midstream Partners, LLC and Venari Resources LLC. He previously served on the board of directors of Broad Oak Energy, Inc. ("Broad Oak"), Hawkwood Energy, LLC, MEG Energy Corp., Targa Resources Corp., Targa Resources Partners LP, Lariat and Latigo. Mr. Kagan is a director of Resources for the Future and a trustee of Milton Academy. Mr. Kagan received a Bachelor of Arts degree cum laude from Harvard College and Juris Doctorate and Master of Business Administration degrees with honors from the University of Chicago.

        Mr. Kagan has significant experience with energy companies, both in the upstream and midstream sectors. Through his position with Warburg Pincus, Mr. Kagan has experienced the spectrum of investments in, and operations of companies engaged in, energy and natural resources. Mr. Kagan also brings a wealth of experience in capital markets activity. Additionally, as a result of Warburg Pincus' extensive involvement in environmental, social and governance ("ESG") practices, including adherence to the Guidelines of Responsible Investment as established by the American Investment Council, and Warburg Pincus' internal establishment of its own "Green Council" to share best ESG practices among its portfolio companies, we receive the benefits associated with such programs as a result of Mr. Kagan's positiondocuments are all located on our boardwebsite www.vitalenergy.com under the Investors Tab and include all Board of directors. For these reasons, among others, we believe Mr. Kagan is qualified to serve asDirector Committee Charters, Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws, Code of Conduct and Business Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers and the Policy Statement Regarding Related Party Transactions.

Code of Conduct and Business Ethics
The Board has adopted a director.

*James R. Levy has served as oneCode of our directors since May 2007. He joined Warburg Pincus in 2006Conduct and focuses on investments in the energy industry. He is a Partner of Warburg Pincus & Co. and a Managing Director of Warburg Pincus. Prior to joining Warburg Pincus, he worked as an Associate at Kohlberg & Company, a middle-market private equity investment firm, from 2002 to 2006, and as an Analyst and Associate at Wasserstein Perella & Co. from 1999 to 2002. Mr. Levy is currently serving on the board of directors of Antero Resources Corporation (where he serves on the compensation committee), Antero Midstream GP LP, ATX Energy Partners, Brigham Minerals, Chisholm Energy Partners LLC, EnStorage, Inc., Hawkwood Energy, LLC, Independence Resources Management LLC and Terra Energy Partners LLC. He is a former director of Broad Oak and Black Swan Energy Ltd. In addition, he is a trustee for Prep for Prep. Mr. Levy received a Bachelor of Arts in history from Yale University.

        As identified above, Mr. Levy has significant experience with various segments of the energy industry. As a result of Mr. Levy's service on the boards of various energy companies, he is able to share best practices not only in the industry, but also in all areas of corporate governance and management. In addition, as our youngest director, he is able to provide a generational point of view at times different than others on our board. Finally, as described more fully in Mr. Kagan's biographical profile above, Mr. Levy's relationship with Warburg Pincus provides us with access to other programs and viewpoints, such as those related to the ESG area. For these reasons, we believe Mr. Levy is qualified to serve as a director.

B.Z. (Bill) Parker has served as one of our directors since May 2007. Mr. Parker joined Phillips Petroleum Company in 1970 where he held various engineering positions in exploration and production in the United States and abroad. He later served in numerous executive positions at Phillips Petroleum Company and in 2000, he was named Executive Vice President for Worldwide Production & Operations. He retired from Phillips Petroleum Company in this position in November 2002. Mr. Parker served on the board of Williams Partners GP LLC, the general partner of Williams


Table of Contents

Partners L.P., a publicly traded master limited partnership, from August 2005 to September 2010 where he also served as chairman of the conflicts and audit committees. He served on the board of directors of Latigo from January 2003 to May 2006 where he also served as chairman of the audit committee. Mr. Parker is a member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers. He received a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering from the University of Oklahoma.

        Mr. Parker has more than 46 years of experience in the oil and gas industry. Mr. Parker's engineering background provides him with the ability to fully comprehend, analyze and offer insights on the wide variety of technically challenging projects facing us as we develop our shale play assets. In addition, Mr. Parker has also served in a variety of executive positions for an exploration and production company and as a director and audit committee member for a large public company. These latter positions further complete his profile as an individual possessing a full gamut of experience in the industry. For these reasons, we believe Mr. Parker is qualified to serve as a director.

Pamela S. Pierce has served as one of our directors since May 2007. She has been a partner at Ztown Investments, Inc. since 2005, focused on investments in domestic oil and natural gas non-working interests. She also is a member of the board of directors of Scientific Drilling International, Inc. and ShawCor Ltd., an energy services company traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange, where she also serves on the compensation committee. From 2005 to 2013, she served on the board of directors of Michael Baker Corporation, and from 2002 to 2004, she was the President of Huber Energy LP, an operating company of J.M. Huber Corporation. From 2000 to 2002, she was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Houston-based Mirant Americas Energy Capital and Production Company. She has also held a variety of managerial positions with ARCO Oil and Gas Company, ARCO Alaska and Vastar Resources, Inc. She received a Bachelor of Science Degree in Petroleum Engineering from the University of Oklahoma and a Master of Business Administration in Corporate Finance from the University of Dallas.

        Ms. Pierce is a highly experienced business executive with extensive knowledge of the energy industry. She has experience in both the operational side of the industry, as well as the service sector, which is an important component affecting our operations. Her breadth of experiences in the industry allows her to bring a perspective on issues that may not be readily apparent to others. Her general business acumen enhances the board of directors' discussions on all matters affecting us, and her leadership insights contribute significantly to the board of directors' decision-making process. For these reasons, we believe Ms. Pierce is qualified to serve as a director.

*Dr. Myles W. Scoggins has served as one of our directors since May 2012. Dr. Scoggins is President Emeritus of the Colorado School of Mines, an engineering and science research university with strong ties to the oil and gas industry. He served as its 16th President from June 2006 until July 2015. Dr. Scoggins retired in April 2004 after a 34-year career with Mobil Oil Corporation ("Mobil") and Exxon Mobil Corporation ("Exxon"), where he held senior executive positions in the upstream oil and gas business. From December 1999 to April 2004, he served as Executive Vice President of ExxonMobil Production Co. Prior to the merger of Mobil and Exxon in December 1999, he was President, International Exploration & Production and Global Exploration and an officer and member of the executive committee of Mobil. He has been a member of the board of directors of Cobalt International Energy, Inc., a publicly traded independent oil exploration and production company focusing on the deepwater U.S. Gulf of Mexico and offshore West Africa, since March 2010 (where he serves on the audit and nominating and corporate governance committees); and QEP Resources, Inc., a publicly traded independent onshore U.S. oil and gas exploration and production company since July 2010 (where he serves on the compensation committee and chairs the audit committee). From February 2005 until June 2010, Dr. Scoggins was a member of the board of directors of Questar Corporation, a publicly traded Rockies-based integrated natural gas company; from March 2005 until August 2011, he was a member of the board of directors of Trico Marine Services, Inc., an integrated provider of subsea, trenching and marine support vessels and services; and from June 2007 until October 2012, he


Table of Contents

was a member of the board of directors of Venoco, Inc., a publicly traded oil and gas production company. Dr. Scoggins has a Ph.D. in Petroleum Engineering from the University of Tulsa.

        Dr. Scoggins has more than 48 years of experience in the oil and gas exploration and production industry. Dr. Scoggins' breadth of knowledge and experience, ranging from his engineering background to his extensive career as a member of senior management with large publicly traded companies (both domestically and internationally, off-shore and on-shore), provides him with unique and invaluable expertise in the upstream oil and gas business. Dr. Scoggins' experiences enable him to provide our board with an abundance of observationsEthics applicable to our business, both from an operationalemployees, directors and managerial perspective. For these reasons, we believe Dr. Scoggins is qualified to serve as a director.

Edmund P. Segner, III joined our board of directors in August 2011. Mr. Segner currently is a professor in the practice of engineering management in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Rice University in Houston, Texas, a position he has held since July 2006. In 2008, Mr. Segner retired from EOG Resources, Inc. ("EOG"), a publicly traded independent oil and gas exploration and production company. Among the positions he held at EOG were President, Chief of Staff and director from 1999 to 2007. From March 2003 through June 2007, he also served as the Principal Financial Officer of EOG. He has been a member of the board of directors of Bill Barrett Corporation, a publicly traded oil and gas company primarily active in the Rocky Mountain region of the United States, since August 2009 (where he serves on the audit, compensation and reserves & EHS committees). He has also served on the board of directors of Archrock Partners, L.P. (formerly Exterran Partners, L.P.), a publicly traded master limited partnership that provides natural gas contract operations services, since May 2009 (where he serves on the audit, compensation and conflicts committees). From February 2014 through April 2016, Mr. Segner was a member of the board of directors of Midcoast Holdings, L.L.C., the general partner of Midcoast Energy Partners, L.P., a publicly traded master limited partnership (an affiliate of Enbridge Energy Company, Inc.), where he served on the conflicts committee. From August 2009 until October 2011, Mr. Segner was a member of the board of directors of Seahawk Drilling, Inc., an offshore oil and natural gas drilling company. He also currently serves as a member of the board or as a trustee for several non-profit organizations. Mr. Segner graduated from Rice University with a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering and received an M.A. degree in economics from the University of Houston. He is a certified public accountant.

        Mr. Segner's service as President, Principal Financial Officer and director of publicly traded oil and gas exploration and development companies demonstrates a strong operational, financial, accounting and strategic background and enables him to provide our board with valuable business, leadership and management experience and insights into many aspects of the operations of exploration and production companies. Mr. Segner also brings financial and accounting expertise to the board, including through his experience in financing transactions for oil and gas companies, his background as a certified public accountant, his service as a Principal Financial Officer, his supervision of other principal financial officers and principal accounting officersa Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, in accordance with applicable U.S. federal securities laws and his service on the audit committeesNYSE Listed Company Manual. Any waiver of other companies. For these reasons,codes may be made only by our Board and will be promptly disclosed as required by applicable U.S. federal securities laws and the NYSE rules. In accordance with good corporate governance practices, we believe Mr. Segner is qualifiedperiodically review and revise these documents as necessary.



32Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
Corporate Governance Guidelines
The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines cover the following:
Board size
Director independence
Selection of the Chairman
Board meetings and agenda
Access to management and advisers
Executive sessions
Committees of the Board of Directors
Stockholder communications with the Board of Directors
Board communications with third parties
Age limits and Retirement
Other directorships
Change in status of directors
Succession planning
Director compensation
Stock ownership guidelines
Director orientation and education
Annual performance evaluations
The NYSE Listed Company Manual requires listed companies to serve as a director.

*Donald D. Wolf has served as one of our directors since February 2010. Mr. Wolf served asadopt certain governance guidelines. The Company believes the ChiefCorporate Governance Guidelines comply with the NYSE Listed Company Manual. Annually, the NGE&S Committee reviews the Corporate Governance Guidelines and recommends any changes for Board approval.

Director Meetings & Executive Officer of Quantum Resources Management, LLC from 2006 to 2009 and served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the general partner of the fund until year-end 2014 when it merged with Breitburn Energy Partners LP, an independent oil and gas master limited partnership, where he currently serves as a director. He is currently Chairman of the board of Enduring Resources, LLC and a director of Aspect Energy, LLC ("Aspect"). He served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Aspect from 2004 to 2006. Prior to joining Aspect, Mr. Wolf served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Westport Resources Corporation from 1996 to 2004. Mr. Wolf graduated from Greenville College, Greenville, Illinois, with a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration.

Sessions

Table of Contents

        Mr. Wolf has had a diverse career in the oil and natural gas industry, beginning in operations and land management, and continuing through his service in a variety of executive positions for several exploration and production companies with varied geographic operations. His extensive and varied experience in the energy industry brings substantial understanding to a wide range of operational, management and transactional situations, as well as unique leadership skills to our board. For these reasons, we believe Mr. Wolf is qualified to serve as a director.


Table of Contents


MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF DIRECTORS

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require that the board of directorsBoard hold at least four meetings each year, and that our independent directors meet in executive session regularly. Our board of directorsBoard held seven27 meetings in 2017,2022, and our independent directors met in executive session five times in 2017. Our boardduring 15 of directors held four regularly scheduled quarterlythose meetings. All Directors attended greater than 75% of the Board meetings and three special telephonicthe Committee meetings in 2017.for Committees on which they serve except for Mr. Hollingsworth who was unable to attend more than 75% of the Audit Committee meetings. All incumbentbut one of the Board members who were on the Board at the time attended last year’s annual meeting.

Committees
BoardAuditCompensationNGE&SFinanceTotal
Meetings in 20225754627


Corporate Governance and Board Matters33
Director Committees
The Board of Directors has four standing committees (the information below reflects the anticipated committee composition at the conclusion of the Annual Meeting, assuming Stockholders elect all nominees to the Board):
Audit CommitteeMembers
Frances Powell Hawes (Chair)
John Driver
Jarvis H. Hollingsworth
Lori A. Lancaster
Edmund P. Segner, III

Charter and Audit Committee Report
The Audit Committee Charter is available on our website at www.vitalenergy.com.
The Audit Committee Charter contains the full list of the Audit Committee’s responsibilities.
The Audit Committee Report is set forth beginning on page 40 of this Proxy Statement.
The Audit Committee reviews the adequacy of and compliance with the Audit Committee Charter annually.
Meetings
The Audit Committee Charter requires that the Audit Committee meet as often as it determines necessary, but at least four times each year. In 2022, the Audit Committee held seven meetings and six executive sessions, either in person or by teleconference. The Audit Committee regularly meets in executive session with each of our external auditors and our Director of Internal Audit.
Primary Responsibilities
Financial Statements
Oversee (1) the quality and integrity of Vital’s financial statements and its related accounting and financial reporting processes and internal controls over financial reporting, and (2) the audits of the Company’s financial statements, including reviewing with management and the independent registered public accounting firm our annual audited and quarterly financial statements and other financial disclosures, including earnings releases.
Oversight of Cybersecurity Risks and Information Technology Systems
Oversight of the Relationship with the Independent Auditor
Engage and oversee the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm (taking into account the vote on stockholder ratification) and consider the independence, qualifications and performance of the independent registered public accounting firm.
Approve all audit and permissible non-audit services to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm.
Review and evaluate the performance of the lead audit partner of the independent registered public accounting firm and periodically consider whether there should be a rotation of the independent registered public accounting firm.
Oversight of the Relationship with the Independent Reserve Engineer
Engage the Company’s independent reserve engineer and review and discuss with management the reserve report prepared by the independent reserve engineer.
Oversight of the Internal Audit Function
Review and approve the internal audit department’s audit plan, staffing, budget and responsibilities.
Oversight of Compliance Matters
Review Vital’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, by reviewing and discussing the implementation and effectiveness of our compliance program.
Establish procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding: (a) accounting, internal accounting controls, audit matters and other federal securities law matters and (b) confidential, anonymous submissions by employees of concerns regarding accounting or auditing matters or other federal securities law matters and (c) any material legal matter.
Review and discuss with management, policies and guidelines regarding enterprise risk assessment and management, major risk exposures and steps taken to monitor and control exposures.
Review and provide oversight of all related party transactions.


34Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
Financial Literacy of Audit Committee and Designation of Financial Experts
As a part of its annual self-assessment process, the Board of Directors evaluated each of the members of the board of directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the board of directors and the total number of meetings held by all committees of the board on which the board member served in 2017. For more information regarding the role and structure of our board of directors, refer to the "Corporate Governance" section included herein.

        The board of directors has three standing committees: the Audit Committee the Compensation Committeefor financial literacy and the Nominatingfinancial expertise in March 2022 and Corporate Governance Committee.

        Audit Committee.    Information regardingMarch 2023. The Board of Directors determined that each of the functions performed by the Audit Committee and its membership is set forth in the "Audit Committee Report" included herein and also in the "Audit Committee Charter" that is posted on the Company's website at www.laredopetro.com. The current members of the Audit Committee are Mr. Segner (Chair), Mr. Parker, Mr. Wolf, Ms. Pierceis financially literate and Dr. Scoggins. The qualifies as a financial expert as defined by the SEC.

Audit Committee Charter requiresIndependence
Only independent directors serve on the Audit Committee. In connection with its assessment of the independence of each director pursuant to the NYSE Listed Company Manual, the Board of Directors also determined that each of the Audit Committee meet as often as it determines necessary but at least four times each year. Themembers met the additional independence standards of the SEC applicable to members of the Audit Committee. No Audit Committee held eight meetings and seven executive sessions during 2017, either in person or by teleconference. The Auditmember concurrently serves on the audit committee of more than two other public companies.
Compensation CommitteeMembers
Dr. Craig M. Jarchow (Chair)
William E. Albrecht
Dr. Shihab Kuran
Lisa Lambert
Charter and Comp Committee Report
The Compensation Committee Charter is available on our website at www.vitalenergy.com.
The Compensation Committee Charter contains the full list of the Compensation Committee’s responsibilities.
The Compensation Committee Report is set forth beginning on page 64.
Meetings
The Compensation Committee Charter requires that the Compensation Committee meet as often as it determines necessary but at least once each year. In 2022, the Compensation Committee held five meetings and two executive sessions either in person or by teleconference.
Primary Responsibilities
Establish the Company’s general compensation philosophy and objectives in consultation with senior management.
Review and approve the Company’s goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, annually evaluate the Chief Executive Officer’s performance in light of those goals and objectives, and, based on this evaluation, recommend to the Board the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation level, including salary, bonus, incentive and equity compensation.
Recommend to the Board compensation for all other named executive officers.
Review and make recommendations to the Board with respect to all employment agreements, severance arrangements, change in control provisions and agreements and any special supplemental benefits applicable to the Company’s executive officers.
Review and make recommendations to the Board regarding any incentive and equity-based compensation applicable to the Company’s employees.
Administer the Company’s equity-based compensation plans, including the grant of performance unit awards and other equity awards under such plans.
Review and make recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to director compensation.
Review and discuss with management the disclosures in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis of the Company’s Proxy Statement.


Corporate Governance and Board Matters35
Compensation Committee regularly meets in executive session with each of our external auditors and our internal audit manager.

        Compensation Committee.    Responsibilities ofIndependence

Only independent directors serve on the Compensation Committee, which are discussed in detail in the "Compensation Committee Charter" that is posted on the Company's website at www.laredopetro.com, include, among other duties, the responsibility to:

        The Compensation Committee has the authority, to the extent it deems appropriate, to retain one or more compensation consultants to assist in the evaluation of director, Chief Executive Officer or other executive compensation. The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate any such consulting firm and to approve the firm's fees and other retention terms. The Compensation Committee also has the authority, to the extent it deems necessary or appropriate, to


Table of Contents

retain other advisers. The Company will provide for appropriate funding as determined by the Compensation Committee, for payment of compensation to any consulting firm or other advisers employed by the Compensation Committee.

        The Additionally, members of the Compensation Committee are Ms. Pierce (Chair), Mr. Levy, Mr. Wolfmust meet the definition of “Non-Employee Director” included in Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). In connection with its assessment of the independence of each director, the Board also determined that all committee members met the additional independence standards of the NYSE and Dr. Scoggins.

        The in the Exchange Act.

Compensation Committee Charter requires thatInterlocks and Insider Participation
No member of the Compensation Committee meet as often as it determines necessary buthas been at least once each year. The Compensation Committee held five meetings and fourany time a Vital employee. None of the Company’s executive sessions in 2017, either in person or by teleconference.

        Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.    The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies, evaluates and recommends qualified nominees toofficers serve on the Company's boardBoard of directors, develops and oversees the Company's internal corporate governance processes and maintainsDirectors or compensation committee of a management succession plan. Additional information regarding the functions performed by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is set forth in the "Corporate Governance" section included herein and also in the "Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter"company that is postedhas an executive officer that serves on the Company's website at www.laredopetro.com.

        The membersCompany’s Board or Compensation Committee. No member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Mr. Parker (Chair), Messrs. Kagan, Segner and Wolf, Dr. Scoggins and Ms. Pierce. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter requires thatCompany’s Board is an executive officer of a company in which one of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meet as often as it determines necessary but at least once each year. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held four meetings in 2017, and two executive sessions.


Table of Contents


EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

        Set forth below is biographical information about each of ourCompany’s executive officers serves as of March 15, 2018, unless otherwise noted.

Randy A. Foutch is the Chairmana member of the board of directors or compensation committee of that company.

Nominating, Corporate Governance, Environmental and Social CommitteeMembers
Jarvis V. Hollingsworth (Chair)
Frances Powell Hawes
Dr. Shihab Kuran
Lisa Lambert
Charter
The Nominating, Corporate Governance, Environmental and Social Committee Charter is available on our website at www.vitalenergy.com.
The Nominating, Corporate Governance, Environmental and Social Committee Charter contains the full list of the Committee’s responsibilities.
Meetings
The Nominating, Corporate Governance, Environmental and Social Committee Charter requires that the Nominating, Corporate Governance, Environmental and Social Committee meet as often as it determines necessary but at least once each year. In 2022, the NGE&S Committee held four meetings and two executive sessions either in person or by teleconference.
Primary Responsibilities
Oversight of Board and Committee Membership
Identify, evaluate and recommend qualified nominees to serve on the Company’s Board.
Review and make recommendations regarding the composition and size of the Board.
Oversight of Governing Policies, Practices and Procedures
Develop and recommend corporate governance guidelines for the Company.
Conduct an annual assessment of the qualifications and performance of the Board and each of the directors.
Review and make recommendations regarding the composition, size, purpose, structure, operations and charter of each of the Board’s committees, including the creation of additional committees or elimination of existing committees.
Recommend committee assignments for directors.
Oversight of Programs and Policies relating to ESG
Review the Company’s performance on environmental and social matters, including the approval and ongoing monitoring of performance against any performance metrics and targets.
Review any significant environmental, health or safety incidents or material regulatory compliance matters and monitor the status of subsequent actions.
Review strategies and policies relation to human capital management, including diversity and inclusion and talent development and retention.
Review significant ESG risks and exposures, and the Company’s actions for managing those risks.
Oversee any reports issued by the Company in connection with its ESG initiatives.


36Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
Finance CommitteeMembers
Lori Lancaster (Chair)
William E. Albrecht
John Driver
Craig M Jarchow
Edmund P Segner, III

Charter
The Finance Committee Charter is available on our website at www.vitalenergy.com and contains the full list of the Committee’s responsibilities.
Meetings
The Finance Committee Charter requires that the Finance Committee meet as often as it determines necessary but at least four times each year. In 2022, the Finance Committee held six meetings and one executive session either in person or by teleconference.
Primary Responsibilities
Reviews and provides guidance on the Company’s annual capital and operating budget.
Reviews and provides guidance on the Company’s capital structure and capital allocation strategy.
Reviews and provides guidance on the Company’s hedging program and policies governing the use of financial instruments, including the derivative instruments.
Upon delegation of authority by the Board, approves acquisitions and hedges which may exceed management’s delegated authority.
Related Party Transactions
The Board recognizes that transactions involving the Company and Laredo'srelated parties present a heightened risk of conflicts of interest, and therefore, has adopted a Policy Statement Regarding Related Party Transactions (“Policy Statement”). This Policy Statement is available on our website, www.vitalenergy.com. The Policy Statement prohibits the Company from entering into a related party transaction unless (1) the Audit Committee approves such transaction in accordance with the Policy Statement; or (2) the transaction is approved by a majority of the disinterested directors of the Company.
A “Related-Party Transaction” is a transaction, arrangement or relationship in which the Company or any of its subsidiaries was, is or will be a participant, the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and a related person had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
A “Related Person” means:
any person who is, or at any time during the applicable period was, one of the Company’s executive officers or one of its directors;
any person who is known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5.0% of the Company’s common stock;
any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons, which means any child, stepchild, parent, stepparent, spouse, sibling, mother-in-law, father-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother- in-law or sister-in-law of a director, executive officer or a beneficial owner of more than 5.0% of the Company’s common stock; and
any entity in which any of the foregoing persons (i) has direct or indirect control, (ii) is a partner or principal or in a similar position, (iii) has a 10.0% or greater beneficial ownership interest or (iv) is employed if (a) the person is directly involved in the negotiation of the Related-Party Transaction or will share or have primary responsibility for such transaction or (b) the person’s compensation from the entity is directly tied to such transaction.
The Audit Committee annually reviews and assesses the adequacy of this Policy Statement.


Corporate Governance and Board Matters37
Procedures for Review, Approval and Ratification of Related-Party Transactions
In reviewing and approving any Related-Party Transaction, the Audit Committee shall:
Satisfy itself that it has been fully informed as to the material facts of the Related Person’s relationship and interest and as to the material facts of the proposed Related-Party Transaction;
Take into account the extent of the Related Person’s interest in the Related-Party Transaction; and
Determine that the Related-Party Transaction is fair to the Company and that the Related-Party Transaction is on market standard terms including no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third-party under the same or similar circumstances.
At each Audit Committee meeting, management can recommend any Related-Party Transactions, if applicable, the Company desires to pursue. After review, the Audit Committee shall approve or disapprove such transactions, and at each subsequently scheduled meeting, management shall update the Audit Committee as to any material change to those proposed transactions. The Audit Committee establishes any guidelines it determines are necessary or appropriate for management to follow in its dealings with Related Persons in Related-Party Transactions. No member of the Audit Committee participates in the review or approval of any Related-Party Transaction if that member is a Related Person.
If management becomes aware of a proposed Related-Party Transaction or an existing Related-Party Transaction that the Audit Committee has not pre-approved, management promptly notifies the Audit Committee Chair to complete the above-described review process. If management, in consultation with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. Please seeOfficer or Chief Financial Officer, determines that it is not practicable to wait until the "Directors" section abovenext Audit Committee meeting, the Audit Committee Chair has the delegated authority to review, consider and determine whether any such transaction is fair to the Company and whether the transaction should be approved, or ratified. The Audit Committee Chair reports to the Audit Committee any transactions reviewed by her pursuant to this delegated authority at the next Audit Committee meeting.
Other Related-Party Transactions
None.
Communications with Directors
Stockholders or other interested parties can contact any director, any Board committee or the Company’s independent directors as a group, by writing to them at the following address: Vital Energy, Inc. c/o Corporate Secretary, Santa Fe Plaza, 521 E. 2nd Street, Suite 1000, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74120. All such communications will be given to the appropriate member(s) of the Board. Comments or complaints relating to the Company’s accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters will also be referred to the Audit Committee.


38Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
Audit Matters
Proposal Two
Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has selected Ernst & Young LLP (“EY”) as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the fiscal year beginning January 2023. The Board of Directors is providing stockholders the opportunity to vote to ratify the appointment of EY. The submission of this matter for approval by stockholders is not legally required, but the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee believe the submission provides an opportunity for stockholders through their vote to communicate with the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee about an important aspect of corporate governance. If the stockholders do not ratify the selection of EY, the Audit Committee will reconsider the selection of that firm as the Company’s auditors but will be under no obligation to appoint a new public accounting firm.
The Audit Committee has the sole authority and responsibility to retain, evaluate and replace the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. As part of this oversight, the Audit Committee has established general best practices to ensure the auditor’s qualifications, independence and performance, including the following:
Audit Committee Best Practices
Review of non-audit fees and services when assessing independence.
Audit partner rotation every five years.
Audit Committee approval of every audit partner.
Regular meetings with the Audit Committee.
Regular executive sessions with the Audit Committee without management present.
Annual evaluation of independent registered public accounting firm by the Audit Committee.
During 2022, the Audit Committee conducted its annual evaluation of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, reviewing the work performed and the experience and qualifications of the team members and elected not to reappoint Grant Thornton, LLP (“GT”) as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2023, and instead voted to replace GT with EY as the independent auditor for the balance of 2022 and for 2023 fiscal year.
The Company expects that one or more representatives of EY will be present at the Annual Meeting. The representative(s) will have an opportunity to respond to appropriate questions and to make a statement if desired.
The stockholders’ ratification of the selection of EY does not limit the authority of the Audit Committee to change auditors at any time.
lpi-20230405_g50.jpg
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year 2023.


Audit Matters39
Audit Services
As disclosed in the Company’s Form 8-K filed on June 7, 2022 (“Auditor 8-K”), the Audit Committee approved the engagement of EY as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for Mr. Foutch's biographical information.

Richard C. Buterbaugh, age 63, joinedthe fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, subject to completion of EY’s standard client acceptance process and execution of an engagement agreement, and dismissed GT as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. GT had served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm since 2007. The reports of GT on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. During the years ended 2020 and 2021, and the subsequent interim period through June 3, 2022: (i) the Company had no disagreements (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions) with GT on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to GT’s satisfaction, would have caused GT to make reference thereto in its reports on the Company’s financial statements for such years, and (ii) there were no “reportable events,” as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K. The Company provided GT with a copy of the disclosures required by Item 304 of Regulation S-K and requested that GT furnish the Company with a letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating whether GT agreed with the statements made by the Company in its Auditor 8-K and, if not, stating the respects in which it did not agree. A copy of GT’s letter, dated June 20127, 2022, is filed as Exhibit 16.1 to the Auditor 8-K.

External audit services for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, were provided by EY, included auditing our consolidated financial statements, auditing the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and has servedservices related to periodic filings made with the SEC. The Company anticipates its selected independent registered public accounting firm will perform similar services for the fiscal year 2023.
The Audit Committee Charter and its pre-approval policy require that the Audit Committee review and pre-approve the plan and scope of external audit and tax services as well as the fees associated with such services. Vital’s Audit Committee pre-approved 100% of the services presented in the table below.
Audit and Other Fees
External audit fees for professional services are as follows:
20222021
Audit fees(1)
$981,000 $825,000 
Tax fees(2)
176,128 19,610 
Total$1,157,128 $844,610 
(1)Audit fees represent fees for professional services provided in connection with: (a) the annual audit of Vital’s consolidated financial statements; (b) the review of Vital’s quarterly consolidated financial statements; (c) the annual audit of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; and (d) the review of certain of Vital’s filings with the SEC, including review of registration statements, comfort letters, consents and research necessary to comply with generally accepted auditing standards for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021. Audit fees incurred for the year ended December 31, 2022 represent audit services provided by EY and audit fees for the year ended December 31, 2021 represent audit services provided by GT.
(2)Tax fees represent: (a) provision of certain tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning by EY incurred during the year ended December 31, 2022; and (b) review of Vital’s tax return and consultation on tax matters by GT incurred during the years ended December 31, 2021.


40Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
Audit Committee Report
During the last fiscal year, and during the first quarter of 2023 in preparation for the filing with the SEC of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, the Audit Committee:
reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022 with management and with EY, including the significant accounting policies used and significant estimates made by management in the preparation of our audited and consolidated financial statements, and the overall quality, not just the acceptability, of our consolidated financial statements and management’s financial reporting process;
reviewed and discussed with the Company’s internal auditor the overall scope and plans for their respective audits. The Audit Committee meets with the internal auditor and EY with and without management present to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of internal controls, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting and their compliance programs;
reviewed and discussed with EY (i) their judgments as to the quality of the Company’s accounting policies, (ii) the written disclosures and letter from the independent registered public accountants required by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) Independence Rules, and their independence, (iii) any issues deemed significant by EY or the Audit Committee, including critical audit matters addressed during the audit, and (iv) the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB, the rules of the SEC, and other applicable regulations;
evaluated the process by which the Company’s Chief Executive Vice President &Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer make the certifications required by the SEC in connection with the filing with the SEC of the Company’s periodic reports, including reports on Forms 10-K and 10-Q; and
pre-approved all auditing services and non-audit services to be performed for the Company since December 2012. He servedby the independent registered public accountants as Senior Vice President—Investor Relations from June 2012required by the applicable rules promulgated pursuant to December 2012. From March 2007the Exchange Act, considered whether the rendering of non-audit services was compatible with maintaining EY’s independence, and concluded that EY’s independence was not compromised by the provision of such services (details regarding the fees paid to June 2011, he was Vice President—Investor RelationsEY in fiscal year 2022 and Corporate PlanningGT in 2021 for audit services, tax services and all other services, are set forth in “Audit and Other Fees” above). Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year and is detailed as to the particular service or category of service. The Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority for such services to one or more of its members, whose decisions are then presented to the full Audit Committee at Quicksilver Resources Inc. From November 1989its next scheduled meeting. For fiscal years 2022 and 2021, all of the services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.


Audit Matters41
The Audit Committee meets regularly with management, including private discussions with EY, and receives the communications described above. However, this oversight does not provide us with an independent basis to August 2006, he wasdetermine that management has maintained appropriate accounting and financial reporting principles or policies, or appropriate internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance with Kerr-McGee Corporation, most recently as Vice President of Corporate Planningaccounting standards and previously as Vice President of Investor Relationsapplicable laws and Communications. After leaving Quicksilver Resources Inc.regulations. Furthermore, such considerations and prior to joining Laredo, as well as after leaving Kerr-McGee Corporation and prior to joining Quicksilver Resources Inc., he was a consultant for oil and gas finance and management projects. Mr. Buterbaugh has more than 40 years of corporate finance, planning and investor relations experiencediscussions do not assure that the Company’s consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the oil and gas industry. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting fromUnited States (“GAAP”) or that the University of Colorado.

Daniel C. Schooley, age 62, joined Laredo in 2007 and has served as Senior Vice President—Operationsaudit of the Company since May 2016. He served as Senior Vice President—Midstream and Marketing from February 2014 to May 2016 and Vice President of Marketing from 2007 to February 2014. Mr. SchooleyCompany’s consolidated financial statements has been carried out in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Management is responsible for the Company’s financial reporting process, including its system of internal controls, and for the preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP. EY is responsible for expressing an opinion on those financial statements. The Audit Committee has relied, without independent verification, on management’s representation that the consolidated financial statements have been prepared with integrity and objectivity and in conformity with GAAP and on the representations of the independent registered public accountants included in their report on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The Audit Committee has also established procedures for (i) the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and (ii) the confidential, anonymous submission by the Company’s employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. However, this oversight does not provide us with an independent basis to determine that management has maintained appropriate accounting and financial reporting principles or policies, or appropriate internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. Furthermore, our considerations and discussions with management and the independent registered public accountants do not assure that the Company’s consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles or that the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements has been carried out in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements referred to above be included in the midstream and marketing business since 1983, serving in senior level management positions at Oxley Petroleum Co., Stalwart Energy Corporation and Lumen Energy Corp. Mr. Schooley holds a Bachelors degree in Forestry and a Masters degree in Resource Economics, both from Oklahoma State University.

Patrick J. Curth, age 66, served as Senior Vice President—Exploration and LandCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022.

Audit Committee of the Company from October 2006 until his recent resignation fromBoard of Directors
Frances Powell Hawes, Chair
Jarvis V. Hollingsworth
Lori A. Lancaster
Edmund P. Segner, III
John Driver
The information contained in this position effective March 1, 2018. Since his resignationAudit Committee Report and references in anticipation of his retirement in March 2019, Mr. Curth has been acting as a Senior Advisor, a non-executive, non-officer position, reporting directlythis Proxy Statement to the CEO. Mr. Curth has been involved in exploration and development projects in the Mid-Continent area for over three decades. Prior to joining Laredo, Mr. Curth joined Latigo in 2000 as Exploration Manager and served as Vice President—Exploration when Latigo was sold in May 2006. From 1997 to 2000, he was the Vice President—Exploration at Lariat. Mr. Curth holds a Bachelor of Arts in Geology from Windham College, a Masters Degree in Geological Sciences from the University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee and a second Masters Degree in Environmental Sciences from Oklahoma State University.

Kenneth E. Dornblaser, age 63, joined Laredo in June 2011 and has served as the Senior Vice President and General Counselindependence of the Company since that time. In 2012, Mr. Dornblaser was also appointed Corporate Secretary. Immediately priorAudit Committee members shall not be deemed to joining Laredo, Mr. Dornblaser was a shareholder in the Johnson & Jones law firm, which he co-founded in March 1994. Priorbe “soliciting material” or to co-founding Johnson & Jones, Mr. Dornblaser had been engaged in the private practice of law in Tulsa, Oklahoma,be “filed” with the law firmSEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of Gable & Gotwals since 1980. Mr. Dornblaser graduated from Oklahoma State University with a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting and1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the University of Oklahoma where he received his Juris Doctorate degree.

Michael T. Beyer, age 42, joined Laredo in September 2007 and has served as Vice President-Controller and Chief Accounting Officer ofExchange Act, except to the extent that the Company since April 2014. He served as Laredo's Controller from February 2012 to April 2014 andspecifically incorporates such information by reference in various accounting roles from September 2007 to February 2012. Mr. Beyer has more than 17 years of experience in accounting, with the majority in the energy industry. Prior to joining Laredo, he worked in the tax field and spent five years at a private energy company, from 2002 to 2007. He received his Bachelor of Business Administration in Accounting from the University of Oklahoma and has been a Certified Public Accountant since 2002.

such filing.


Table of Contents


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


42Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
Executive Compensation Matters
Proposal Three
Advisory Vote Approving the Compensation of Our Named Executive Officers
We are seeking stockholder approval on an advisory, non-binding basis of the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in the Executive Compensation Matters section of this Proxy Statement. In this proposal, stockholders are being asked to vote on the following advisory resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the compensation tables and the other narrative executive compensation disclosure in the Proxy Statement for our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.”
To learn more about our compensation program, including our process for determining executive compensation, please see the Compensation Discussion & Analysis.
Although the vote is advisory and non-binding, our Board of Directors and Compensation Committee value the opinions that our stockholders express in their votes and will carefully consider the voting results in connection with their ongoing evaluation of our compensation program.
The affirmative “FOR” vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting is required to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers. Unless otherwise instructed on the proxy, properly executed proxies will be voted in favor of approving on an advisory, non-binding basis the compensation of our named executive officers.
lpi-20230405_g50.jpg
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR the advisory resolution approving the compensation of our named executive officers.


Executive Compensation Matters43
Compensation Discussion and& Analysis

The following discussion and analysis contains statements regarding our named executive officers'officers’ past and future performance targets and goals. These targets and goals are disclosed in the limited context of our compensation programs and should not be understood to be statements of management'smanagement’s expectations or estimates of results or other guidance.

Introduction

        The following compensation discussion and analysis describes the material elements

CD&A Table of compensation for each of the individuals identified in the "Named Executive Officers" table, who we refer to in this "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" as our "named executive officers."

Named Executive Officers

        For the 2017 fiscal year, our named executive officers were:

Contents


Randy A. Foutch

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
44

Richard C. Buterbaugh

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Daniel C. Schooley

Senior Vice President—Operations

Patrick J. Curth

Senior Vice President—Exploration & Land

Kenneth E. Dornblaser

Senior Vice President and General Counsel

Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement

        Messrs. Foutch

CD&A Executive Summary
As outlined above, our strategy is to create long-term value for our stockholders through accretive acquisitions of oil-weighted properties and Buterbaugh are named executive officers by reasonthe disciplined development of their positions asthose properties in the principal executive officer ("PEO") and principalPermian Basin. In 2022, our strong financial officer ("PFO"), respectively,performance was a direct result of the Company duringexecution of this strategy. The development of assets we acquired since 2019 enabled us to capitalize on higher oil prices, generate Free Cash Flow, reduce debt and leverage and return cash to stockholders. Specific 2022 highlights include:
Generated Company-record cash flows from operating activities of $830 million and Free Cash Flow(1) of $220 million
Repurchased $285 million face value of term-debt
Reduced our leverage ratio(2) to 1.18x from 2.14x at year-end 2021
Repurchased $37 million of common stock
Grew oil production 19% compared to 2021
Organically added 35 oil-weighted locations, maintaining eight years of inventory at current activity levels
Demonstrated continued progress towards 2025 emissions reduction goals and introduced a 2025 water recycling goal and a 2030 combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions intensity goal
(1)    See Annex A for definitions of non-GAAP financial measures.
(2)    Leverage measured by Net Debt/Consolidated EBITDAX. YE-21 Consolidated EBITDAX represents the year. Mr. Schooley, Mr. Curthsecond half of 2021 annualized due to significant acquisitions in 2021. Non-GAAP financial measure; please see Annex A for definitions of non-GAAP financial measures and Mr. Dornblaser are named executive officers as they arereconciliations of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures.
The STIP and LTIP performance metrics for 2022 were updated from those used in 2021 to better reflect changes within our three most highly compensated executive officers (other thanindustry, current strategy and feedback from our PEO and PFO) who were serving in such capacity atstockholders. Following consultation with our independent compensation consultant, the end of 2017. See discussion of Mr. Curth's recent resignation in "EXECUTIVE OFFICERS" above.

Fiscal Year 2017 Performance Highlights and Impact on Incentive Compensation

        In 2017, the prices for oil, natural gas and NGL remained volatile while associated service costs increased. Despite this uncertain environment, we successfully grew our oil, natural gas and NGL production and reserves, while generating significant and repeatable efficiencies in our drilling program and cost controls in all areas of our operations.


Table of Contents

        The following illustrates our 2017 performance highlights, how they were supported by our incentive programs Committee recommended and the resulting payouts showing the alignment between our incentive programs and execution of our strategy.

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC


Table of Contents

        Our 2017 short-term incentive payout of 105% of target is reflective of the Company's performance against the 2017 Bonus Performance Metrics (weighted 60%), as well as the Compensations Committee's subjective assessment of the Company's overall strategic performance in other areas (weighted 40%). Individual adjustments were made after considering Company performance in other areas as well as individual performance factors such as leadership, commitment, motivational effect, level of responsibility and overall contribution to the Company's success. The Compensation Committee scored the subjective portion equal to the quantitative portion. On the quantitative portion, the Company achieved near or above target results onBoard approved using four of the fivesix previous metrics (ROACE, production, unit LOEwith slight modifications and unit cash generalrevised targets, all of which reflect a potential improvement over prior year performance and administrative expense),above average industry metrics (Spill Intensity, Air Stewardship, Free Cash Flow and below target results on drilling ROR. For a more complete description of these targets, see "2017 Bonus Performance Metric Targets and Results."

        Despite the operational successes noted above, in part because of our continuing efforts to test well spacing and completion techniques—Gross Inventory Added with a viewminimum of 25% Drilling Rate or Return). Drilling Rate of Return was removed as a STIP performance metric and in its place five new metrics were added to increase inventorymore accurately reflect the Company’s focus on safety and ultimately maximize shareholder value over the long term by more judiciously developing our assets—our capital expenditures exceeded our cash flows from operations in 2017. We believe this plan inordinately negatively impacted our stock performance, particularly in the fourth quarter of the year. This also contributed to our stock price declining by 7% for the yearproduction goals (Contractor Plus Employee TRIR(1), Employee DART(2), Operated Base Performance and 2.4% for the prior three years, positioning us at the 36th percentile relative to our peers, and resulting in a 0% payout for our 2015 long-term incentive performance share unitsCash Cost per BOE) that matured at the end of 2017 and vested in 2018.

Shareholder Say-on-Pay Results and Management Responsiveness

        Our executive compensation program received the support of 83.26% of shares voted at our 2017 annual meeting, which the Compensation Committee viewsbelieves help incentivize management to efficiently operate its newly purchased and legacy assets.

2021 STIP Performance Metrics2022 STIP Performance Metrics
Environmental as follows:Environmental as follows:
Spill Severity Rate7.5 %15 %Spill Intensity5.0%10 %
Air Stewardship7.5 %Air Stewardship5.0%
Drilling Rate of Return20 %Contractor Plus Employee TRIR5 %
Free Cash Flow20 %Employee DART5 %
Lease Operating Expense per BOE15 %Operated Base Performance, BOPD10 %
Gross Inventory Added with a Minimum 25% Drilling Rate of Return30 %Operated Wedge Performance, CUM Type Curve BOPD10 %
100 %Cash Cost per BOE15 %
Free Cash Flow ($MM)20 %
Gross Inventory Added with a Minimum
25% Drilling Rate of Return (Well Count)
25 %
100 %
(1)    TRIR is defined as evidenceTotal Recordable Incident Rate
(2)    LDART is defined as Days Away Restricted or Transferred


Executive Compensation Matters45
For our LTIP Performance Metrics, we received positive feedback from our stockholders and our independent compensation consultant for our structure that combines the Relative Shareholder Return Metric and Absolute Shareholder Return Metric into a PSU Matrix as shown below that consists of stockholder supportthree separate annual performance periods during the three-year period of the Company's executive compensation decisions and policies. DespiteLTIP grant, so we continued this significant level of approval, given the continued volatility of the oil and gas industry, the Compensation Committee, with the advice of its independent compensation adviser, continuesframework. The Board believes that this structure reflects an incentive to review the compensation program and modify it in ways that it believes will furtherconsistently align the interests of our executive officersexecutives with thosestockholders on both an annual basis and for the longer term while also reflecting both our absolute and relative performance. In addition, we maintained the Net Debt to Consolidated EBITDAX and Inventory Growth metrics to reflect the need for the Company to emphasize inventory growth to extend its runway of oil-weighted projects as desired by our stockholders. In addition, following feedback from our investors, we added an ESG component to the LTIP criteria to reflect our focus on operating in a safe and responsible manner. With the addition of the ESG metric, the weighting used for each of the metrics was updated to 50% for the PSU Matrix, 20% for Net Debt to Consolidated EBITDAX and 15% each for inventory growth and ESG. Lastly, the performance peer group was updated to reflect the Company’s most relevant peer companies in terms of size and competition.
2021 Performance Unit Award Metrics2022 Performance Unit Award Metrics
Three-year relative and absolute total
shareholder return
50%Three-year relative and absolute total
shareholder return
50%
Three-year growth in inventory25%Three-year growth in inventory15%
Three-year Net Debt/Consolidated EBITDAX25%Three-year Net Debt/Consolidated EBITDAX20%
100%ESG15%
100%
Each performance measure is evaluated against established targets and as a result of not achieving a threshold level of performance under two measures (Operated Base Performance and Cash Cost per BOE), the overall STIP payout for 2022 resulted in a payout at 80% of target. For a full description of our stockholders. Based in part2022 Executive Compensation Program, see the discussion beginning on such advice, as well as discussions with some of our stockholders, we have further refined our short- and long-term compensation programs for 2018. See "Compensation Program for 2018." The Compensation Committee will continue to review stockholder votes on our executive compensation and determine whether to make changes to the program accordingly.


Table of Contents

Summary of our Compensation Program

        The key components of our compensation program and how each supports our compensation objectives are presented in the following table:

page 53.

Element

Description

Objectives

Salary rateAnnual cash compensationSalary rates are designed to provide a fixed level of cash compensation for services rendered during the year.
STIP Payout of 80% of Target2020 Performance Unit Awards Payout of 151% of Target
Short-term incentive performance ("STIP") awardsCash bonus award, based primarily on overall Company performance, with consideration also given to relative individual performanceAnnual cash bonus awards are a key part of each named executive officer's annual compensation package. The Compensation Committee believes that cash bonuses are an appropriate way to further the Company's goal of attracting, retaining and rewarding highly-qualified and experienced officers. Cash bonuses are generally awarded annually following completion of the service year for which bonuses are payable and based primarily on Laredo's performance relative to predetermined targets for such service year, with consideration also given to individual performance and specific contributions to Laredo's success and performance.
lpi-20230405_g63.jpg
Long-term equity-based incentive ("LTIP") awards
lpi-20230405_g64.jpg
For corporate officers, consists of approximately 50% performance units and 50% restricted stockOur long-term plan-based incentive program is designed to provide our employees, including our named executive officers, with an incentive to focus on our long-term success and to act as a long-term retention tool by aligning the interests of our employees with those of our stockholders. In previous years, stock options were also included in the LTIP pay mix.

Compensation Best Practices

        The Company maintains

For 2022, we continued to seek to make the total target NEO compensation arrangements intended to optimize returns to shareholders and include best practice features.

near the median of our compensation peer group with the understanding that there may be individual variation.


What We DoWhat We Don't Do
Maintain robust equity ownership guidelines for directors and executivesProvide excise tax gross-ups for executives

Tie a significant portion of annual incentive compensation to Company performance and stock performance46


Provide for "single trigger" change in control severance

Utilize an independent compensation consultant


Provide long-term employment agreements to executives

Perform an annual compensation risk assessment, including to ensure our compensation structure does not encourage unnecessary risk taking


Allow for option repricing without stockholder approval

Provide at least 50% of long-term incentives in the form of performance-based compensation


Allow directors or officers to pledge and/or hedge Company stock

Use a representative and relevant peer group


Provide excessive perquisites

Fully disclose incentive plan targets and results


Provide for maximum performance unit payout in the event of negative total shareholder return ("TSR")Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement

Say-on-Pay Results & Management Responsiveness

Table

Of the shares voted at the 2022 annual meeting of Contents

Compensation Structure Supports Alignment Between Executives and Shareholders

        Ourstockholders, 95.5% voted to approve Vital’s 2021 executive compensation. We believe this continued high approval of our executive compensation programreflects stockholder satisfaction with the steps taken by the Board and Compensation Committee to establish a fair and robust compensation system that reflects concerns held by stockholders.

Key Compensation Enhancements in Past Three Years
Implementation of market-based executive severance plan, providing payment only for involuntary termination without cause or other termination for good reason
Updated STIP performance metrics to better reflect criteria important to stockholders, emphasizing free cash flow and sustainability
Additional disclosures regarding the Compensation Committee’s role in developing performance metrics and peer group selection methodology
Updating weighting of LTIP performance unit awards to equally weight each metric
Adoption of an executive incentive clawback plan, providing for clawback in certain instances of financial restatement or bad acts
Evolving enhancement of LTIP performance unit award weighting and metrics, including implementation of a metric for 2022 tied to achievement of our 2025 emission reduction targets
Named Executive Officers
Our named executive officers (“NEOs”) are as follows:
NamePositions
Jason PigottPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Bryan LemmermanSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Karen Chandler*Former Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Mark DennySenior Vice President—General Counsel & Secretary
*      On August 24, 2022, the Company announced the involuntary departure of Dr. T. Karen Chandler, the Company’s Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, effective immediately. Dr. Chandler’s involuntary departure was not the result of any disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to the Company’s operations, policies or practices. The Company did not fill the Chief Operating Officer role, and Dr. Chandler’s responsibilities were absorbed by other members of the Company’s management team. In connection with her involuntary departure, Dr. Chandler received severance under the Company’s Executive Severance Plan. Of the total amount paid to Dr. Chandler, 86% was due to payment for previously granted restricted stock and performance units that were cancelled. Approximately 14% of the total payment to Dr. Chandler was the cash severance payment amount prescribed under the Executive Severance Plan.


Executive Compensation Matters47
In addition to Mr. Pigott, whose biography is strongly aligned with Companyincluded under the Director Qualifications section, set forth below is the biographical information for each of our current executive officers.
lpi-20230405_g65.jpg
Bryan Lemmerman
Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial
Officer since June 2020
Age 48
Mr. Lemmerman joined Vital in June 2020. Mr. Lemmerman has more than 16 years of experience in the energy exploration and production industry, including an extensive background in strategic planning and business development. He previously spent 10 years with Chesapeake Energy Corporation, serving in financial roles with increasing responsibility, most recently as Vice President—Business Development and Treasurer. Prior to joining Chesapeake, Mr. Lemmerman was a portfolio manager at Highview Capital Management and Ritchie Capital Management, overseeing investments in public and private energy companies. He began his career as a tax consultant with Deloitte & Touche.
Education
B.B.A., Accounting, Texas A&M University
M.S., Accounting, Texas A&M University
M.B.A., University of Texas
lpi-20230405_g66.jpg
Mark Denny
Senior Vice President—General Counsel and Secretary since April 2019
Age 42
Mr. Denny joined Vital in February 2013. Prior to his most recent promotion, he served as Vice President and General Counsel. Prior to joining Vital, Mr. Denny worked in-house at SEH Offshore, Inc. and Seahawk Drilling, Inc. Prior to that, Mr. Denny worked at the international law firms of Vinson & Elkins and Fried Frank.
Education
B.S., Economics and Political Science, Vanderbilt University
J.D., Georgetown University Law Center


48Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
2022 Compensation Alignment & Pay for Performance
To ensure that we pay our NEOs for their performance andin relation to our strategy, the majority of our named executive officers'their compensation is considered variable and at-risk. We balance the various components ofheavily dependent on performance metrics pre-established by our compensation program by tying significant portions of total compensation to short- and long-term financial and strategic goals, currently in the form of annual cash bonus awards and long-term plan-based incentive awards. We also attempt to set each officer's salary rate in line with comparable positions with our peers and to award an annual cash bonus based on the achievement of overall Company strategic goals and each individual's relative contribution to those goals. Our compensation philosophy is designed to align the interests of our employees with those of our stockholders.

Board. The following pie charts depict the allocation of target salary rate, targetfixed compensation (salary rate) vs. variable compensation (target STIP bonusawards and target LTIP grantawards) for 2022 of our Chief Executive OfficerCEO and average for the other named executive officers for 2017 (assumingcurrent NEOs, assuming each such person receives his or her target percentage for STIP and LTIP awards). Performance-based LTIP awards are those awards that vest based on both the passage of time and the Company's performance.


CEO Pay Mix

GRAPHIC


Average NEO Pay Mix

GRAPHIC


Table of Contents

        For further discussion regarding the salary rates, STIP in the form of annual cash bonus awards and long-term plan-based incentive awards see "—Elements of Compensation."

        The following table sets forth the approximate percentages of our named executive officers' total compensation as defined by the SEC in the form of salary, STIP bonus and equity awards during the fiscal year 2017 as set forth in the "Summary compensation table" that appears in "—Summary Compensation."


2017 Actual Pay Mix(1)

Name
 Principal position Salary as a
percentage of
total
compensation(2)
 STIP bonus as a
percentage of
total
compensation(2)
 Equity awards
as a percentage
of total
compensation(3)
 

Randy A. Foutch

 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  12% 16% 72%

Richard C. Buterbaugh

 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  15% 14% 70%

Daniel C. Schooley

 Senior Vice President—Operations  18% 17% 64%

Patrick J. Curth

 Senior Vice President—Exploration and Land  18% 16% 64%

Kenneth E. Dornblaser

 Senior Vice President and General Counsel  18% 16% 64%

(1)
The remaining portions of the named executive officers' total compensation were attributable to all other compensation during the fiscal year 2017. For further discussion of the named executive officers' all other compensation see "—Summary Compensation."

(2)
The amounts used in these calculations were the actual amounts earned in 2017, even if paid in another year.

(3)
The equity awards amounts used in these calculations were the sum of the grant date fair values of the restricted stock awards, stock option awards and share-settled performance unit awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Please refer to Note 7 to our audited consolidated financial statements in our 2017 Annual Report for disclosures regarding fair value estimates of restricted stock awards, stock option awards and share-settled performance unit awards.

Table of Contents

CEO Target Compensation vs. Realized Compensation

CEO 3-Year Target vs. Realized Compensation

GRAPHIC

Target Compensation:    Target salary rate, target STIP bonus and target LTIP grant

Realized Compensation:    For items included see "Realized Compensation," page 47.

Stock Price:    Valued using the average closing price for each fiscal year

Process for Determining Executive Compensation

Compensation philosophy and competitive market positioning

        Our executive compensation program is designed to attract, retain and motivate highly-qualified and committed personnel by compensating them with both potential long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity, options and performance incentives, and short-term cash compensation comprised of salary and the possibility of annual bonuses. We intend for our mix of compensation incentives to enhance our ability to recruit, retain and motivate our executives and other employees and to accelerate the value recognition of our assets for the benefit of our stockholders.

        We believe that our pay mix enables us to provide a competitive pay package in order to recruit and retain executives, while placing a larger emphasis on at-risk, variable and return-based compensation. The following chart summarizes the Company's compensation strategy by pay element, as well as our named executive officers' current competitive marketing positioning, based on data


Table of Contents

supplied in 2017 by Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. ("FW Cook"), who has been engaged by the Compensation Committee as its independent compensation adviser.


Compensation Element

Target Positioning

2017 Competitive Market Positioning

Salary RateMarket MedianAggregate salary rates for our named executive officers were approximately 96% of the market median
CEO Target Pay Mix
lpi-20230405_g67.jpg
Other NEOs Average Target Pay Mix
lpi-20230405_g68.jpg
Total Cash Compensation
The following table sets forth the approximate allocation between fixed and variable compensation for each NEO’s actual pay. This table is the approximate percentages of our NEOs’ total compensation in the form of salary, STIP award and LTIP awards during the fiscal year 2022 as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table.
2022 Actual Pay Mix(1)
Name and Principal Position
Salary as a
percentage of total
compensation
(2)
Cash awards as a
percentage of total
compensation
(2)
Equity-based awards
as a percentage
of total
compensation
(3)
Jason Pigott
President and Chief Executive Officer
12.5%12.5%75%
Bryan Lemmerman
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
12%9%79%
Mark Denny
Senior Vice President General Counsel & Secretary
22%15%63%
(1)The remaining portions of the NEOs’ total compensation were attributable to all other compensation during the fiscal year 2022. For further discussion of the NEOs’ all other compensation see the Summary Compensation Table.
(2)The amounts used in these calculations were the actual amounts earned in 2022.
(3)The equity-based award amounts used in these calculations were the sum of the grant-date fair value of the restricted stock awards and performance unit awards. Please refer to Note 9 to our audited consolidated financial statements in our 2022 Annual Report for disclosures regarding fair value estimates of these awards.


Market MedianWith respect to total cash compensationpaid to our executive officers, the Company was positioned at 102% of the market median. The Company'starget total cash compensation was positioned at 101% of the market median
Executive Compensation Matters49
The below tables shows the specific performance metrics in 2022 for the STIP and LTIP and demonstrates how those performance metrics align with our corporate strategy on both a short-term and long-term basis. For more details regarding the 2022 executive compensation and performance metric results, see page 53.
CompensationLong-term incentive compensationKey Performance MetricsMarket MedianThe named executive officers were positioned at 84% of the market medianCompany Strategy
lpi-20230405_g69.jpg
Short-Term
Incentive Program
Environmental
Spill Severity Rate (5%)
Air Stewardship (5%)
Managing Risks
lpi-20230405_g70.jpg
Contractor Plus Employee TRIR (5%)
Safety
Employee DART(5%)
Safety
Operated Base Performance, BOPD (10%)
Asset Optimization
Operated Wedge Performance, CUM Type Curve BOPD (10%)
Growth in Production
Cash Cost per BOE, excl. LTIP(15%)
Fiscal Responsibility
Free Cash Flow Excluding Acquisitions ($MM) (20%)
Optimizing Assets
Gross Inventory Added with Minimum 25% Drilling ROR (Well Count) (25%)
Seeking High-Margin Inventory
Long-Term Incentive ProgramRestricted Stock Awards (50%)
lpi-20230405_g71.jpg
Stock PriceIncreasing Stockholder Value
lpi-20230405_g72.jpg
Performance Share Units (50%)
lpi-20230405_g73.jpg
Relative Three-Year Total Shareholder Return compared to peer group and Absolute Three-Year Total Shareholder Return (50%)
Increasing Stockholder Value
Three-Year Net Debt/Consolidated EBITDAX (20%)
Risk Management
Three-Year Growth in Inventory (15%)
High Margin
Growth
ESG (15%)
Community Stewardship and Safety

Implementing

Compensation Philosophy & Process for Determining Executive Compensation
We design our objectives

        Executiveexecutive compensation decisions are made on an annual basis byprogram to attract, retain and motivate highly-qualified and committed personnel who will successfully execute our strategy and create stockholder value.



50Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
Compensation Committee’s Role in Our Compensation Program
The Board has delegated to the Compensation Committee with input primarily from Messrs. Foutchthe responsibility of establishing the general compensation philosophies and Buterbaugh. Althoughobjectives of the Company. Specifically, the Compensation Committee considers the input received from these executive officers, compensation decisions affecting our executive officers (including our named executive officers)evaluates and other officers are ultimately recommendedrecommends for ultimate approval by the Board compensation related decisions for the Company as follows:
Review and approve the Company’s goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, annually evaluate the Chief Executive Officer’s performance in light of those goals and objectives, and, based on this evaluation, recommend to the Board the CEO’S compensation level, including salary, bonus, incentive and equity compensation. In determining the long-term incentive component of the CEO’s compensation, the Compensation Committee considers, among other factors, the Company’s performance and relative shareholder return, the value of similar incentive awards to CEOs at comparable companies and the award given to the Company’s CEO in past years.
Consider the non-binding vote of stockholders to approve executive compensation each year at the annual meeting, feedback received from stockholders as part of the Company’s stockholder engagement program, recommendations from the CEO and input from the Company’s independent compensation consultant
Make recommendations to the Board with respect to all compensation for executive officers.
Make recommendation to the Board with respect to all employment agreements, severance arrangements, change in control provisions and agreements and any special supplemental benefits applicable to the Company’s executive officers.
Review and make recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to incentive compensation and equity-based plans.
Administer the Company’s equity-based compensation plans, including the grant of performance unit awards and other equity awards under such plans.
For more information regarding the results of the stockholder vote to approve executive compensation from the 2022 annual meeting and the Compensation CommitteeCommittee’s 2022 stockholder outreach related to our compensation program, please see the Say-on-Pay Results and approved by the board of directors.

Management Responsiveness section.

CEO’s Role in Our Compensation Program
With the approval of the Compensation Committee, Messrs. Foutchthe CEO obtains and Buterbaugh have routinely obtained and reviewedreviews external market information (including that received from the Compensation Committee'sCommittee’s independent compensation adviser,consultant, as more fully described below) to assessdetermine if the Company's ability to provideCompany is offering competitive compensation packages to our executive officersNEOs and to recommend anany adjustment to the compensation levels when necessary. In making executive compensation recommendations, Messrs. Foutch and Buterbaugh considerThe CEO also considers both the Company'sCompany’s and the executive officers' performanceofficer’s performances during the year. Moreover,year, including whether the officer served in an executive officer's expanded role at the Company could also serve as a basis for adjustment. Specifically, Messrs. Foutch and Buterbaugh provideCompany. The CEO provides recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding the compensation levels for our existing officers (provided that Mr. Foutch's compensation is solely determined by the Compensation Committee, and Mr. Buterbaugh's compensation is determined by the Compensation Committee based in part on the recommendations of Mr. Foutch) and our compensation program as a whole.

whole (except regarding his own compensation).

While the Compensation Committee gives considerable weight to Messrs. Foutch's and Buterbaugh'sthe CEO’s input on compensation matters,matter, it applies its own analysis and judgment before making a recommendation to the boardBoard of directors, after consideringDirectors. The Board of Directors considers the recommendations of the Compensation Committee but has the final decision-making authority on all executive (including on named executive)compensation matters.
Independent Compensation Consultant Role in Our Compensation Program and other officerConflicts of Interest Analysis
The Compensation Committee Charter grants the Compensation Committee the authority, to the extent it deems appropriate, to retain one or more compensation matters. No other executive officers have a roleconsultants to assist in the evaluation design or administration of director and executive compensation. The Compensation Committee’s objective when engaging an independent consultant is to assess our executive officer compensation program.

Competitive Benchmarking

        In lightlevel of the ever-changing energy industry, we closely monitor the appropriateness of our peer group. With the assistance of FW Cook, we review our peers annually to decide on their continued inclusioncompetitiveness for executive-level talent and consider possible additions. Beginning in 2016provide recommendations for attracting, motivating and continuing for 2017, theretaining key employees, including identifying industry-best practices. The Compensation Committee recommended, andhas the board of directors approved, the use of two separate peer groupssole authority to benchmark executive compensation and to measure performance under the Company's performance

retain


Table of Contents

units. Below is the peer group used for the purpose of benchmarking base compensation for our named executive officers ("Compensation Group") for 2016 and 2017.



Compensation
Group
Company
20162017
CarrizoExecutive Compensation Matters51
and terminate any such consulting firm and to approve the firm’s fees and other retention terms. The Company provides appropriate funding as determined by the Compensation Committee, for payment of compensation to any consulting firm or other advisers employed by the Compensation Committee.
The Compensation Committee elected to engage Willis Towers Watson (“WTW”) to serve as its independent compensation adviser beginning August 14, 2019. WTW assists the Compensation Committee in reviewing our executive compensation program and providing comparative market data and trends on compensation practices and programs based on an analysis of our peer companies.
WTW provides a very small amount of nonexecutive compensation consulting services. The Compensation Committee considered the relationships that WTW had with the Company, the members of the Compensation Committee and our executive officers, as well as the polices that WTW has in place to maintain their independence and objectivity, and determined that no conflicts of interest arose from the work performed by WTW.
Peers and Benchmarking
The Compensation Committee engages with the independent compensation consultant to develop the competitive assessment of NEO compensation on an annual basis, which includes benchmarking our NEO compensation against a compensation peer group as well as relevant industry specific compensation surveys. The peer group is developed using a combination of objective and subjective criteria, including size, similarity of business, geographical proximity of operations, production focus, performance and competition for talent. While the Compensation Committee believes that it may be difficult to select an appropriate size peer group due to the competitive environment and unique services provided by the Company, the Compensation Committee believes the companies identified below were the most appropriate companies for benchmarking compensation for the 2022 compensation program. The Compensation Committee aims for Vital’s revenue to be within the 40th to 60th percentiles of the peer group, recognizing that this may not be possible in every year. Based on this review, the Committee approved the following peer group for 2022:
2022 Compensation Peer Group*
Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc.
Callon Petroleum Company
Centennial Resource Development, Inc.
Cimarex Energy, Inc.
Comstock Resources, Inc.
Contango Oil & Gas Inc. 
XX
Cimarex Energy Co. XX
Concho Resources Inc. XX
Diamondback Energy, Inc. XX
Energen Co. XX
EP Energy Co. XX
Newfield Exploration Co. XX
Oasis Petroleum, Inc. XX
PDC Energy, Inc. XX
Range Resources Corp. XX
SM Energy CompanyXX
Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc.*X
Comstock Resources, Inc.*X
EXCO Resources, Inc.*X
Northern
Magnolia Oil & Gas Inc.*
X
SandRidge Energy, Inc.**X
Ultra Petroleum Corp.**X
Corporation
Matador Resources Company
Murphy Oil Corporation
Northern Oil and Gas, Inc.
X
PDC Energy, Inc.
Penn Virginia Corporation
SM Energy Company
Southwestern Energy Company
Talos Energy, Inc.
Parsley
*      This peer group was used to develop competitive market data in November 2021 to inform the 2022 executive compensation decisions. The Compensation Committee adjusts the compensation peer group on an annual basis to add or remove companies due to size, revenue, geographic basin, bankruptcies and mergers.
As part of our compensation philosophy and design, we seek to make the total target NEO compensation near the median of our compensation peer group with the understanding that there may be individual variation.
We utilize a separate peer group for the performance metrics in our performance unit awards. The Compensation Committee believes this is beneficial as the performance unit award peer group represents a much larger market-based investment group while the compensation peer group represents the most analogous companies competing for talented employees. To see the performance unit award peer group for the 2020, 2021 and 2022 performance unit awards, see page 70 following our Outstanding Equity Awards at 2022 Fiscal Year-End Table.
For 2022, the Compensation Committee approved the independent compensation consultant’s use of the following data as part of its annual efforts to develop a competitive assessment of NEO pay: (i) WTW’s 2022 Southwest Energy Survey Group; (ii) WTW’s 2022 Oil and Gas compensation survey; (iii) WTW’s 2022 General Industry compensation survey; and (vi) Proxy data of public companies in our peer group.


52Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
Developing Performance Metrics
Additionally, the Compensation Committee and the Board, with the assistance of the independent compensation consultant, determine the performance metrics we use in our compensation program for both short-term and long-term incentive awards. The Compensation Committee reviews all performance metrics annually to make sure they appropriately incentivize our NEOs and employees to execute the short-term goals and long-term strategies important to the Company’s success and the creation of value for its stockholders. In setting the performance metrics, the Compensation Committee also takes into account prior performance on similar metrics and establishes future goals based; in part, on prior performance. For more information on the establishment of the 2022 performance metrics, see the 2022 Executive Compensation Program.
Risk Assessment
The Compensation Committee and management have reviewed our compensation policies as generally applicable to our employees and believe that our policies do not encourage excessive and unnecessary risk-taking, and that the level of risk that they do encourage is not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.
Our compensation philosophy and culture support the use of salary, short-term incentive cash awards and long-term incentive equity and cash compensation throughout our organization and with all levels of employees. In addition, the following specific factors, in particular, reduce the likelihood of excessive risk-taking:
Our overall compensation levels are competitive with the market; and
Our compensation mix is balanced among (i) fixed components such as salary and benefits, (ii) short-term incentive cash awards and (iii) long-term incentive equity and cash awards that reward our employees based on long-term overall financial performance and operational measures.
We believe our historical compensation programs did not, and our current compensations programs do not, encourage excessive and unnecessary risk taking by NEOs (or other employees) because of its focus on the Company’s performance with only some consideration given to individual performance. The Compensation Committee will continue to monitor the compensation program to discourage excessive and unnecessary risk-taking.
Additionally, the Compensation Committee manages risk by establishing equity ownership guidelines and prohibiting hedging our stock or using it as collateral for any purpose.
Equity Ownership Guidelines
The Compensation Committee recommended, and the Board approved, stock ownership guidelines for the current NEOs to further align the interest of our NEOs with those of our stockholders. Individuals have five years from their hire, promotion or appointment date to reach the following stock ownership guidelines (as a multiple of salary rate):
X
RSP Permian, Inc. Stock Ownership RequirementsXMultiple of Base Salary
Sanchez Energy CorporationCEOX5x
WPX Energy, Inc. Senior Vice PresidentsX2x

Stock actually owned and stock awarded under restricted stock awards are included for purposes of satisfying these guidelines. No stock potentially exercisable under stock option awards is included. The value of the stock used for calculation of compliance with these requirements shall be the higher of (i) value at the date of grant and (ii) market value. In 2022, all of our NEOs satisfied the stock ownership guidelines.
*
Removed
NameMultiple of Base Salary RequiredCompliance Status
Jason Pigott5xIn compliance
Bryan Lemmerman2xIn compliance
Mark Denny2xIn compliance


Executive Compensation Matters53
Policies Against Hedging and Pledging Stock
Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits our directors, NEOs and employees from engaging in 2017 duehedging transactions designed to lowhedge or offset a decrease in market value of such person’s common stock in the Company. We prohibit such conduct to ensure our directors and officers have the same objectives as the Company’s other ongoing concerns

**
Removedstockholders by remaining exposed to the full risks of ownership of Company stock.
In addition, our directors and NEOs may not hold their Company securities in 2017 duea margin account and may not, without prior approval and in very limited circumstances, pledge Company securities as collateral for any other loan. The only exception to bankruptcy

Elementsthe prohibition on pledging securities may exist in the case of a non-margin loan where the director or officer was clearly able to demonstrate the financial ability to repay the loan without resort to the pledged securities, and only if such pledge was pre-approved by our General Counsel. No shares owned by our directors or NEOs are currently pledged.

Tax and Accounting Implications
The Compensation

Committee considers the tax and accounting implications in determining the elements of the Company’s compensation program. Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), generally limits the deductibility of annual compensation paid to a “covered employee” to $1 million. As of January 1, 2018, the definition of “covered employee” includes the named executive officers and certain former named executive officers of a Company. Despite this limit, the Compensation Committee may determine that it is in the Company’s best interests to provide for compensation that is not deductible.

2022 Executive Compensation Program
Base Salary
Salary Rates

Process for Setting Salary Rates:rates are structured to reflect each of our named executive officers’ skills, responsibilities, experience, tenure and contributions to the Company. Salary rates are typically reviewed annually and adjusted, if deemed warranted, in the first quarter of each year. In considering adjustments to salary rates, our Compensation Committee considers both our internal performance and external market factors.

        In addition to providing a salary rate that we believe is competitive with peers, we also consider internal pay equity among each of our named executive officers' salary levels relative to the salary levels of our other officers so that it accurately reflects the officer's relative skills, responsibilities, experience and contributions to the Company. Annual salary adjustments are based on a subjective analysis of manyseveral individual factors, including:

the responsibilities of the officer;

the scope, level of expertise and experience required for the officer's position;

the strategic impact of the officer'sofficer’s position;

the potential future contribution of the officer; and

the actual performance of the officer during the previous year.

Table of Contents

In addition to the individual factors listed above, we also take into consideration our overall business performance and implementation of Company objectives,objectives. As with the other components of our compensation program, we review industry trends and the salary rates of our peers as well as industry trends.well. While these factors generally provide context for making salary decisions, salary rate decisions do not depend directly on attainment of specific goals or performance levels and no specific weighting is given to one factor over another.

The following table presents the salaries earned by our named executive officers in 2016 and their salary rates for our NEOs in 20162021 and 2017:

2022.
Name
2021 salary rate(1)
($)
2022 salary rate(1)
($)
Percent
change
Jason Pigott720,000775,0007.6%
Bryan Lemmerman440,000475,0008.0%
Karen Chandler470,000485,0003.2%
Mark Denny350,000375,0007.1%
(1)See the Summary Compensation Table on page 64 for amounts earned.
Name
 2016 salary earned 2016 salary rate(1) 2017 salary rate Salary rates'
percent change
 

Randy A. Foutch

 $758,462 $800,000 $848,000  6%

Richard C. Buterbaugh

 $440,856 $465,000 $490,000  5%

Daniel C. Schooley

 $344,865 $380,000 $400,000  5%

Patrick J. Curth

 $360,269 $380,000 $391,000  3%

Kenneth E. Dornblaser

 $331,827 $350,000 $365,000  4%


(1)
As of the first of the year in 2016, the named executive officers' salary rates remained at the level established in the beginning of 2015. As we indicated in our 2015 proxy statement, based on the industry environment in early 2016, our named executive officers recommended a 10% reduction in their salary rates effective February 28, 2016. The Compensation Committee and the Company's board of directors agreed with the recommendation. Later in the year, as a result of the improved overall performance of the Company and improved general state of the industry, effective September 5, 2016, the Compensation Committee and the board of directors approved the reinstatement of the named executive officers' 2016 salary rate levels, as shown in the table above. For this reason, the table above also reflects the actual salaries earned in 2016 by each of our named executive officers.

STIP

Target Award Levels:    Target short-term incentive percentages for 2017 awards for each named executive officer are listed below and are calculated as a percentage of salary earned. Award levels are calculated on a threshold level of 50% of target and a maximum of 200% of target. The annual incentive target percentage varies by named executive officer and is based on differing job classifications and responsibilities. Each position is compared to similar positions in the market as well as our peer companies.

Name
2017 short-term
incentive
percentage target

Randy A. Foutch

125%

Richard C. Buterbaugh

54
90%

Daniel C. Schooley

85%

Patrick J. Curth

85%

Kenneth E. Dornblaser

85%Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement

Plan Mechanics:    For

Annual Incentive
To incentivize and recognize achievements throughout the 2017 fiscal year, annual cash bonuses were determined in two parts ateach NEO and Company employee is given a STIP target percentage, which is a percentage of his or her salary. If the sole discretion ofCompany meets certain performance metrics throughout the year, the Company will pay STIP awards. STIP target percentages vary by NEO based on differing job classifications and responsibilities, and the Compensation Committee compares each percentage to similar positions in the market and our peer companies.
The following table presents the STIP target percentages for ultimate approval byour NEOs in 2021 and 2022.
Name
2021 STIP
target percentage(1)
2022 STIP
target percentage(1)
Jason Pigott110%125%
Bryan Lemmerman90%90%
Karen Chandler90%90%
Mark Denny85%85%
(1)See the boardSummary Compensation Table on page 64 for amounts earned.
The Compensation Committee sets the objective performance metrics that the Company must meet to receive an STIP award. Each metric is evaluated independently with threshold, target and maximum goals established for each. No payout is earned for a metric that fails to meet a minimum performance threshold. A 50% payout is earned for a metric that meets the minimum threshold, a 100% payout is earned for a metric that meets target and a maximum of directors.200% payout is earned for a metric that meets or exceeds the maximum goal (with payout linearly interpolated for performance that falls between the goals). The objective 2017 Bonus Performance Metric Results (discussed below) established 60%Compensation Committee recommends and the Board approves any STIP award amount based on performance metrics (weighted 70%) as well as the Compensation Committee’s subjective assessment of the total cash bonus, while the remaining 40% was subjectively determined by the Compensation Committee considering the Company'sCompany’s overall strategic performance in other areas. Individualareas (weighted 30%). Historically, the Compensation Committee has rarely increased the STIP payout percentage based on its subjective assessment of the Company’s overall strategic performance above the objective criteria level.
The Company determines an individual award by taking the salary earned during the performance year multiplied by the individual STIP target percentage, the result of which is then multiplied by the Company STIP payout percentage, the result of which may then be adjusted for individual performance. The Compensation Committee considers individual adjustments were madefor our named executive officers after consideringreceiving input provided by Messrs. Foutch and Buterbaughthe CEO regarding both Company performance in other areas, as well as individual performance factors such as leadership, commitment,


Table of Contents

motivational effect, level of responsibility and overall contribution to Laredo'sVital’s success (provided that Mr. Foutch's performance was solely determined by the Compensation Committee and Mr. Buterbaugh's performance wassolely determined by the Compensation Committee based in part on the recommendations of Mr. Foutch)CEO’s STIP award).

Eligible Earningsx
Individual STIP Target
Percentage of Earnings
x
Company STIP
Payout Percentage
Approved by Board
±
Any Individual
Performance
Adjustment
Although our cash bonus programSTIP award includes the Company 2017 Bonus Performance Metrics,objective performance metrics, our Compensation Committee has the ultimate discretion to recommend to the boardBoard of directorsDirectors whether to award any, and the amount of, cash bonusSTIP awards.

        Our STIP awards,



Executive Compensation Matters55
The Compensation Committee, in conjunction with our independent compensation consultant, recommended, and the Board approved, the following performance metrics for a calendar year's Companythe 2022 STIP. The Compensation Committee believes these performance measures reflect environmental, safety, operational and individual performance, are also generally paid in early Marchfinancial priorities of the following year after we file our Annual Report on Form 10-K and the objective metrics on which such awards are partially based have been documented.

2017 Bonus Performance Metric Targets and Results:    Our 2017business. The performance metrics capture several criticalfor the 2022 STIP are as follows:

MetricArea of FocusWeighting
2022 Target
Performance
2022 Actual
Performance
Metric Payout
Spill Intensity(1)
Environmental5.0%0.030.021160%
Air Stewardship(2)
Environmental5.0%5,9004,219200%
Contractor Plus Employee TRIR(3)
Safety5.0%0.440.6160%
Employee DART(4)
Safety5.0%0.200.00200%
Operated Base Performance, BOPD(5)
Operational and Financial10%0.0%-3.3%0%
Operated Wedge Performance, CUM Type Curve BOPD(6)
Operational and Financial10%0.0%0.0%100%
Cash Cost per BOE(7)
Operational and Financial15%$7.70$9.380%
Free Cash Flow ($MM)(8)
Operational and Financial20%$300$22060%
Gross Inventory Added with
a Minimum 25%
Drilling ROR (Well Count)(9)
Operational and Financial25%9097108%
(1)Spill Intensity: Gross operated barrels of produced liquids (both crude and produced water) released per thousand barrels of gross operated combined liquid production outside of all secondary containment
(2)Air Stewardship: Mcf flared or vented per bcf produced from operated properties owned by Vital as of 12/31/2022.
(3)Contractor Plus Employee TRIR: Total number of employee and contractor recordable injuries x 200,000 over the total number of hours worked by employees and contractors.
(4)Employee DART: Total number of recordable injuries and illnesses that caused a worker to be away, restricted, or transferred x 200,000 over the total number of hours worked by all employees.
(5)Operated Base Performance: Actual 2022 net operated oil production from base producing wells measured as the average percentage over / under the forecast supporting the Board of Directors approved 2022 Budget. Base producing well set is defined as any well having first oil production prior to 11/1/2021.
(6)Operated Wedge Performance: The average gross cumulative oil production of the 2022 development program measured as the average percentage over / under the forecast supporting the Board of Directors approved 2022 Budget. Wedge producing well set is defined as any well having first oil production between 11/1/2021 and 10/31/2022.
(7)Cash Cost per BOE: Lease operating expense, general and administrative expense excluding LTIP (long-term incentive plan), transportation expense, minimum volume payments (MVC), 3rd party purchased oil (gain) loss and midstream (gain) loss per barrel of oil equivalent. Lease operating expense is inclusive of workovers, G&A allocations, and excludes non-cash items.
(8)Free Cash Flow: Consolidated EBITDAX less interest expense and incurred capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions, changes in working capital and non-cash charges. The calculation of Free Cash Flow for the 2022 STIP performance criteria that we believe provide a quantitativemetric differs from the non-GAAP financial measure of overall Company performance. The targets were set basedFree Cash Flow as disclosed in the 2022 Annual Report.
(9)Gross Inventory Added: Gross inventory added via acquisitions or improved economics on the Company's 2017 operating plan, which also takes into account our capital budget for the year. The operational metrics reflect the Company's emphasis on the development of the Company's assets through efficient capital deployment. Each metric is relatively weighted, and for each metric, a minimum threshold, a target and a stretch target are established.

        No credit is earned for a metric that fails to meet a minimum threshold. A 100% credit is earned for a metricexisting acreage that meets or exceed the target, and a maximumminimum drilling rate of 200% credit is earned for a metricreturn of Gross inventory added via acquisitions or improved economics on existing acreage that meets or exceeds its stretch target (with intervals between directly interpolated).

        The objective 2017 Bonus Performance Metrics consistedan IRR of a three-year average ROACE, production volume measured in million barrels of oil equivalent ("MMBOE"), drilling ROR, LOE over sales volumes ($/BOE) and general and administrative expense over sales volume ($/BOE)25%. The minimum threshold, target and stretch target for each metric, together with the actual results and relative weighting of each metric resulting from the Company's 2017 performance, are indicated in the table below.

2017 Performance metrics
 Minimum
thresholds
 2017
targets
 Stretch
targets
 2017
results
 Relative
weighting
 

Return on Average Capital Employed(1)

  10.0% 12.5% 15.0% 12.6% 30.0%

Production (MMBOE)

  20.9  21.4  22.0  21.3  25.0%

Drilling Rate of Return(2)

  30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 33.2% 20.0%

Lease Operating Expense ($/BOE)(3)

 $4.30 $4.10 $3.70 $3.53  12.5%

General and Administrative Expense ($/BOE)(4)

 $2.83 $2.76 $2.62 $2.75  12.5%

(1)
Based on a three-year average which compares Adjusted EBITDA, excluding adjustments for accretion of asset retirement obligations and our proportionate share of our equity method investee's depreciation and amortization for the two years prior to 2017, to total capital employed (consisting of total net debt, total stockholders' equity and tax adjustments for non-cash impairment and mark-to-market on commodity derivatives). Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure that we define as net income or loss plus adjustments for income tax expense or benefit, depletion, depreciation and amortization, bad debt expense, impairment expense, non-cash stock-based compensation, accretion expense, mark-to-market on derivatives, cash premiums paid for derivatives, interest expense, write-off of debt issuance costs, gains or losses on disposal of assets, income or loss from our equity method investee, proportionate Adjusted EBITDA of our equity method investee and other non-recurring income and expenses. See our 2017 Annual Report for further information and a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss).

(2)
Calculated using the future cumulative net cash flows of our wells drilled in 2017, measured as a percentage of 2017 drilling and completion capital invested. The prices used were the 2017 oil, NGL and natural gas budget prices.

Table of Contents

(3)
Includes both LOE and workover expenses.

(4)
Excludes non-cash stock-based compensation.

2017 Bonus Strategic Performance Accomplishments:    As noted above, the remaining 40% of target cash bonus awards was determined subjectively byIn addition, the Compensation Committee considering the Company's strategic performance in other areas. The following were among the performance accomplishments considered by the Compensation Committee in determining the 2017 payout amount:

        Individualmay make individual adjustments were made after considering (i) Company performance in other areas as well as individual performance factors such as leadership, commitment, motivational effect, level of responsibility and overall contribution to the Company's success.

STIP payoutsCompany’s success, and (ii) the recommendation of the CEO, other than for 2017 performance

        Followinghimself. After such review and discussion the Compensation Committee's reviewCommittee did not exercise discretion to change the STIP payout for the CEO or any of our NEOs. Additionally, the Compensation Committee did not exercise any positive discretion for the 30% subjective portion of the performance goals and approved a payout consistent with the achievement of the objective 2017 Bonus Performance Metric Results and the subjective results of the Company as described above, the Compensation Committee determined in its discretion that the Company's overall performance resulted in the approval of a cash payout for officers of approximately 105% of their target bonus amounts. The short-term incentive bonuses approved by the Compensation Committee for our named executive officers approximated 105% of their target bonus amounts, aligning with the overall Company performance rating percentage. The individual awards to the named executive officers are identified in the following table. The Compensation Committee submitted its recommendations to our board of directors, which approved such recommendations. The amounts shown under the "Approved award payout" column were paid to the named executive officers in March 2018 after our financial statements had been completed and our 2017 Annual Report was filed in February 2018.

criteria.
Name2022 STIP salary
($)
2022 STIP target
percentage
2022 STIP
target value ($)
Award payout
($)
Approved percent
payout to target
Jason Pigott764,423125%955,529764,42380%
Bryan Lemmerman468,26990%421,442337,15480%
Mark Denny370,19285%314,663251,73180%

Name
 2017 salary
earned
 2017 short-term
incentive
percentage target
 2017
short-term
incentive
value at target
 Approved
award payout
 Percent
payout to
target
 

Randy A. Foutch

 $840,615  125%$1,050,769 $1,107,000  105%

Richard C. Buterbaugh

 $486,154  90%$437,539 $460,000  105%

Daniel C. Schooley

 $396,923  85%$337,385 $355,000  105%

Patrick J. Curth

 $389,308  85%$330,912 $347,000  105%

Kenneth E. Dornblaser

 $362,692  85%$308,288 $324,000  105%

Long-term Plan-based Incentive Awards

        In connection with our initial public offering in late 2011, we adopted the Laredo Petroleum, Inc. Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan, which was amended in 2016 (as so amended, the "Equity Incentive Plan").

Target Award Levels:    Target incentive levels for long-term incentive awards for 2017 for each named executive officer are listed below. These remained at 2016 target levels and are calculated as a percentage of the most recent salary rate prior to the grant date. The long-term incentive target percentage varies by named executive officer and is based on differing job classifications and


Table of Contents

responsibilities. Each position is compared to similar positions in the market as well as our peer companies.


Name
2017 long-term
incentive
percentage target

Randy A. Foutch

525%

Richard C. Buterbaugh

56
400%

Daniel C. Schooley

300%

Patrick J. Curth

300%

Kenneth E. Dornblaser

300%Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement

Long-Term Incentive Vehicles:    For named executive officers in 2017,
To prioritize retention and long term goals of the Company, targetedeach NEO and employee is given an LTIP target percentage, which is a percentage of his or her salary, and a grant of Company long-term incentive vehicle mixawards in accordance with that percentage. For our NEOs, the Company’s LTIP grant consists of approximately 25%50% restricted stock 25% stock options and 50% performance units. This mix of incentive vehicles, as well as theunit awards. The applicable vesting periods described below, were adopted byand restrictions for the board of directors followingrestricted stock and applicable performance period and performance metrics for the recommendation of FW Cook andperformance share units are set forth below. By tying a review of comparable awards granted by our peer group and the industry in general. As more fully discussed above under "Alignment of Pay and Performance," we believe that by tying significant portionsportion of our officers' total compensation to awards that are directly impacted byto the performance of our common stock, we align the interests of our officersNEOs with those of our stockholders. Long-term equity incentivesLTIP grants are generally awarded within two daysin the first quarter following our Board meeting and the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Following consultation with WTW, our Compensation Committee decided to change the individual LTIP target percentages for our NEOs for the 2022 calendar year performance as indicated in the below table to better align their LTIP targets to approximately the 50th percentile of our 2022 compensation peer group. In addition, the Compensation Committee considered additional factors in making their determination including past performance, criticality to the business and potential future individual growth.
The following table presents the LTIP target percentages of salary for our NEOs in 2021 and 2022.
Name
2021 long-term incentive
target percentage(1)
2022 long-term incentive
target percentage(1)
Jason Pigott485%516%
Bryan Lemmerman350%375%
Karen Chandler415%402%
Mark Denny231%250%
(1)The LTIP target percentage is a percentage of salary rate. See the Summary Compensation Table on page 64 for amounts earned.
The value of the long-term incentive awards to be granted was determined by taking the LTIP target percentage multiplied by the most recent salary rate prior to the grant date (“Grant Value”). The total number of both the shares of stock and performance units granted were calculated by dividing the Grant Value by the average closing price of our stock for the 10 trading days ended February 16, 2022 for an average closing stock price of $69.42. The grant date, number of shares of restricted stock, number of performance units and grant-date fair values are presented in the following table.
The grant-date fair values were computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 as described in Note 9 to our audited consolidated financial statements in our 2022 Annual Report, and not the Grant Value.
Restricted stock(1)
Performance units(2)
NameGrant date
Shares of
stock (#)
Grant-date
fair value ($)
Units (#)
Grant-date
 fair value ($)
Jason Pigott2/22/202228,8101,930,84628,8102,585,986
Bryan Lemmerman2/22/202227,2351,825,29012,8301,151,621
Karen Chandler(3)
2/22/202214,045941,29614,0451,260,679
Mark Denny2/22/20226,763453,2566,763607,047
(1)The restricted stocks’ grant-date fair value is computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and is determined based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on February 22, 2022, which was $67.02 per share. These shares vest 33%, 33% and 34% on a time basis per year beginning on the first anniversary date of the grant, except for a one-time retention grant of 14,405 shares included in Mr. Lemmerman’s 2022 restricted stock awards which will cliff-vest at the end of the third anniversary of the grant date.
(2)The combined $89.76 per unit grant-date fair value was computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and consists of (i) $112.49 per unit grant-date fair value, determined utilizing a Monte Carlo simulation, for the 50% PSU Matrix Component and (ii) $67.02 per unit grant-date fair value, for the 20% Net Debt/Consolidated EBITDAX Component, the 15% Inventory Growth Component and the 15% ESG Component determined based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on February 22, 2022. These performance units will be settled in stock, have a three-year cliff vest and a performance period of January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2024. See page 66 for additional information on these performance units.
(3)Effective August 24, 2022, Dr. Chandler, the Company's former Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, was terminated and, as a result, Dr. Chandler's unvested awards were forfeited.


Executive Compensation Matters57
Restricted Stock:shares will vest and the transfer restrictions thereon will lapse ratably, over three years. The restricted shares of our common stock are subject to forfeiture until vested. So long as the recipient of such shares is an employee of the Company, generally the shares granted to each recipient will vest, and the transfer restrictions thereon will lapse ratably, over three years. Each recipient will forfeit his or her unvested shares if the recipient'srecipient’s employment is terminated by us for any reason or if the recipient resigns (in either case, other than for death or disability). We believe that thisThis vesting schedule is comparable to those utilized by the peer group and will assist us in attracting new talent and retaining existing personnel. Restricted shares of common stock may be granted to new employees upon hire to attract talent to the Company. All new hire employee grants must be approved by the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and all executive officer grants must be approved by the Compensation Committee.

Stock Options: Stock options provide the opportunity to purchase our stock at a price that is fixed on the grant date regardless of the future market price. We consider stock options a form of performance-based compensation. If our stock price does not increase, then these stock options will have no economic value. Pursuant to the terms of the Equity Incentive Plan, the exercise price for each stock option is the closing price of a share of common stock on the NYSE on the grant date. We have issued stock options to our named executive officers only on an annual basis, following the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Therefore, generally such stock options were issued at an exercise price equal to the market close on the second trading day following the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

      The stock option awards vest ratably over four years. As with the restricted shares of our common stock, we believe that this vesting schedule is comparable to those utilized by our peer group and will enable us to retain existing personnel. The unvested portion of a stock option award will expire upon termination of employment of the optionee, and the vested portion of a stock option award will remain exercisable for (i) one year following termination of employment by reason of the optionee's death or disability or (ii) 90 days for any other reason, other than for cause. Both the unvested and vested (but unexercised) portion of a stock option award will expire upon the termination of the optionee's employment by us for cause. Unless sooner


Table of Contents

      terminated, the stock option award will expire if and to the extent it is not exercised within 10 years from the date of the grant.

    Performance Units: The performance unit awards granted to each recipient in 2015, 2016 and 2017 are payable2022 will vest in common stockthe first quarter of the Company. These share-based performance units are based upon achievement over2025 following a three-year performance period againstfrom 2022 to 2024 if the Company meets the performance goalsthresholds established by the Compensation Committee.

      Each performance unit represents one share of common stock of the Company. With respect to performance unit awards granted in 2015, 2016 and 2017, the amount of stock payable at the end of the performance period was or will be determined by multiplying the number of performance units by the applicable total shareholder return modifier ("TSR Modifier"). The TSR Modifier is determined as follows:

Level of Performance
TSR PerformanceTSR Modifier(1)(2)

Below Threshold

<40th Percentile0%

Threshold

40th Percentile50%

Target

60th Percentile100%

Maximum

³80th Percentile200%

(1)
Amounts between percentages are interpolated on a straight-line basis.

(2)
With respect to performance units granted in 2016 and 2017, the recipient's maximum payout will be limited to 150% of TSR in the event our stock price has declined during the relevant performance period, even if our TSR among our performance peer group would otherwise call for a payout in excess of 150%.

        The following table shows the peer group used to measure TSR performance (the "Performance Group") for awards granted in 2015, 2016 and 2017:


Performance Group
Company
201520162017

Cimarex Energy Co. 

XXX

Concho Resources, Inc. 

XXX

Diamondback Energy, Inc. 

XXX

Energen Corp. 

XXX

EP Energy Corp. 

XXX

Parsley Energy, Inc. 

XXX

QEP Resources, Inc. 

XXX

RSP Permian, Inc. 

XXX

SM Energy Company

XXX

Clayton Williams Energy, Inc.*

XX

Rosetta Resources, Inc.*

X

Whiting Petroleum Corp. 

XX

Callon Petroleum Company

X

Pioneer Natural Resources Co. 

X

WPX Energy, Inc. 

X

*
Removed due to acquisition

Table of Contents

        As noted above, our performance units awarded in 2015, 2016 and 2017 are payable in shares of common stock (with a three-year cliff vest). Therefore, not only are such awards subject to achieving a minimum relative TSR, but these awards are further directly impacted by movements in our stock price.

Each recipient will forfeit his or her performance unit awards if the recipient'srecipient’s employment with us is terminated by the Company for any reason or if the recipient resigns (in either case, other than for death or disability). If the employment is terminated due to death or disability, the recipient is entitled to receive a pro-ratedprorated performance unit.unit grant. Generally, grants of performance unit awards will be made in the first quarter of each year, when our results of operations for the previous year have generally been determined and when our Compensation Committee is normally meeting to discuss short-term incentive payouts based on the prior-yearprior year results.

        Based in part upon the recommendation of FW Cook, beginning with grants made in 2016, the Compensation Committee included key employee non-officers in the group of employees who receive

2020 to 2022 Performance Unit Award Payout Results
The performance units as a part of their total overall compensation. Before this change, these employees received only restricted stock, and in some limited cases, stock options, as a long-term incentive. Following this change, such employees now receive a smaller percentage of restricted stock, with the balance of their long-term incentive awarded in the form of performance units. We believe this change more closely aligns the interests of these key employees with the interests of our stockholders and provides a retention benefit to the Company.

LTIP Awards in 2017

        For our named executive officers, the Company's LTIP awards in 2017 targeted a long-term incentive vehicle mix of approximately 25% restricted stock, 25% stock options and 50% performance units.

        The following table presents the grants in the form of long-term incentive compensation to the named executive officers in 2017. The grant date, numbers awarded, fair values (which were computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 as described in Note 7 to our audited consolidated financial statements in our 2017 Annual Report, not the value used in accordance with determining the grant numbers awarded) and share-settled performance units estimated future payout in shares were as follows:

 
  
  
  
  
  
 Share-settled
performance units(3)
  
  
  
 
 
  
 Restricted stock(1) Stock options(2) Share-settled performance
units estimated future payout
in shares(4)
 
 
  
 Number of
shares of
stock
 Grant date
fair value
($)
 Number of
shares of
stock
 Grant date
fair value
($)
 Number of
units
 Grant date
fair value
($)
 
Name
 Grant date Threshold Target Maximum 

Randy A. Foutch

  2/17/2017  79,217  1,118,544  119,826  985,395  158,434  3,004,622  79,217  158,434  316,868 

Richard C. Buterbaugh

  2/17/2017  34,875  492,435  52,754  433,825  69,751  1,322,793  34,876  69,751  139,502 

Daniel C. Schooley

  2/17/2017  21,352  301,490  32,298  265,604  42,705  809,879  21,353  42,705  85,410 

Patrick J. Curth

  2/17/2017  20,872  294,713  31,571  259,626  41,744  791,654  20,872  41,744  83,488 

Kenneth E. Dornblaser

  2/17/2017  19,484  275,114  29,472  242,364  38,968  739,009  19,484  38,968  77,936 

(1)
The restricted stocks' grant date fair value is determined based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on February 17, 2017, which was $14.12 per share. These shares vest 33%, 33% and 34% on a time basis per year beginning on the first anniversary date of the grant.

(2)
We utilize the Black-Scholes option pricing model to measure the grant date fair value of stock optionunit awards granted under our Equity Incentive Plan. Stock option awards vest and become exercisable in four equal installments on each of the four anniversaries of the grant date. These stock option awards have an exercise price of $14.12 per share, which was the February 17, 2017 closing price of our common stock on the NYSE, and an expiration date of February 17, 2027.

(3)
We utilize a Monte Carlo simulation to measure the share-settled performance units' grant date fair value. These share-settled performance units have a three-year cliff vest andMarch 5, 2020 had a performance period of January 1, 20172020 to December 31, 2019.

(4)
As noted on page 34, performance units are payable in stock for achievement of a "Threshold" level of performance, i.e., achievement over a three-year period of TSR performance equaling the 40th percentile (50% of performance units payable in stock), at the "Target" level of

Table of Contents

    performance, i.e., achievement over a three-year period of TSR performance equaling the 60th percentile (100% of performance units payable in stock)2022 and are also payable for achievement of the "Maximum" level of performance, i.e., achievement over a three-year period of TSR performance equaling or exceeding the 80th percentile (200% of performance units payable in shares). All intervening percentages are directly interpolated. In the event that the "Start Average Stock Price" is greater than the "End Average Stock Price" plus "Dividends" (as such terms are definedvested in the award agreement), then, unless otherwisefirst quarter of 2023. We determined by the board of directors or Compensation Committee, the TSR modifier shallpayout to be no greater than 150%.

Compensation Program for 2018

2018 Peer Group Changes

        As part of its annual compensation review, beginning in the fall of 2017 and continuing as part of ongoing discussions with our Compensation Committee, FW Cook again reviewed our Compensation Group and Performance Group to consider whether the groups were still appropriate in terms of composition and if they should be consolidated.

        FW Cook recommended that we consolidate our Compensation Group and Performance Group into a single group. FW Cook also suggested possible companies to add to the group. Consolidating the group more closely aligns our compensation and performance comparisons. Expanding the group provides a broader base of comparison and smooths out the dramatic effects on compensation and performance that can result from a small sample size.

        Our Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed these recommendations and ultimately adopted the recommended changes. As a result, with respect to compensation matters in 2018, our peer group consists of the companies listed below:


2018 Combined Peer Group

Callon Petroleum CompanyParsley Energy, Inc.
Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc.PDC Energy, Inc.
Centennial Resource Development Inc.QEP Resources, Inc.
Diamondback Energy, Inc.Range Resources Corp.
Eclipse Resources Corp.Resolute Energy Corporate
Energen CorporationRSP Permian, Inc.
EP Energy Corp.Sanchez Energy Corporation
Extraction Oil & Gas Inc.SM Energy Company
Jagged Peak Energy Inc.SRC Energy Inc.
Matador Resources CompanyWhiting Petroleum Corp.
Newfield Exploration Co.Wildhorse Resource Development Corp.
Oasis PetroleumWPX Energy, Inc.

2018 Salary Rates

        In February 2018, following an extended review of data provided by FW Cook with respect to target pay elements of our Compensation Group, and in accordance with our compensation philosophy of targeting our officer salary rate at the market median, our Compensation Committee and our board of directors approved the 2018 salary rates for our named executive officers indicated in the table below. We believe the new salary rates reflect the approximate median of our peer group.


Table of Contents

        The following table presents the salary rates of our named executive officers in 2017 and 2018:

Name
 2017 salary
rate
 2018 salary
rate
 Salary rates'
percent change
 

Randy A. Foutch

 $848,000 $848,000  %

Richard C. Buterbaugh

 $490,000 $500,000  2%

Daniel C. Schooley

 $400,000 $420,000  5%

Patrick J. Curth(1)

 $391,000 $391,000  %

Kenneth E. Dornblaser

 $365,000 $375,000  3%

(1)
Mr. Curth's 2018 salary rate amount presented above was effective up until his March 1, 2018 resignation as Senior Vice President—Exploration and Land, when he transitioned to a non-executive, non-officer role as Senior Advisor in anticipation of his retirement in March of 2019. As of March 1, 2018, Mr. Curth receives an annual salary rate of $293,250, which is based on Mr. Curth being available to fulfill a work schedule of 40 hours per week, subject to reduction for proration.

2018 STIP Target Award Levels

        Following consultation with FW Cook, our Compensation Committee determined not to change the STIP percentage target award levels. Therefore, the STIP target award levels remain as indicated in the following table.

Name
 2017 short-
term incentive
percentage
target
 2018 short-
term incentive
percentage
target
 

Randy A. Foutch

  125% 125%

Richard C. Buterbaugh

  90% 90%

Daniel C. Schooley

  85% 85%

Patrick J. Curth(1)

  85% %

Kenneth E. Dornblaser

  85% 85%

(1)
Effective March 1, 2018, Mr. Curth resigned from his position as Senior Vice President—Exploration and Land and transitioned to a non-executive, non-officer role as Senior Advisor in anticipation of his retirement in March of 2019, and therefore no longer has an STIP target level.

2018 STIP Performance Metrics

        Effective for 2018, following consultation with certain of our investors and FW Cook, our Compensation Committee recommended, which recommendation was approved by the board of directors, to update the objective bonus performance metrics and relative weightings for our STIP for 2018 as reflected below. We believe that these updated metrics and relative weightings are better


Table of Contents

aligned with our 2018 business strategy, place a focus on capital efficiency and provide the type of incentives sought by our board of directors and investors.

2018 Performance metrics
Relative
weighting

Cash Flow Return on Average Capital Employed(1)

40.0%

Proved Developed Reserves (BOE)/Debt-Adjusted Share(2)

25.0%

Drilling Rate of Return(3)

20.0%

Production (MBOE)

15.0%

(1)
Based on a three-year average which compares Adjusted EBITDA, excluding adjustments for accretion of asset retirement obligations and our proportionate share of our equity method investee's depreciation and amortization for the years ended 2016 and 2017, to total capital employed (consisting of total net debt, total stockholders' equity and tax adjustments for non-cash impairment and mark-to-market on commodity derivatives). Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure that we define as net income or loss plus adjustments for income tax expense or benefit, depletion, depreciation and amortization, bad debt expense, impairment expense, non-cash stock-based compensation, accretion expense, mark-to-market on derivatives, cash premiums paid for derivatives, interest expense, write-off of debt issuance costs, gains or losses on disposal of assets, income or loss from equity method investee, proportionate Adjusted EBITDA of our equity method investee and other non-recurring income and expenses. See our 2017 Annual Report for further information and a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss).

(2)
Proved developed reserves are estimated as of December 31, 2018. Debt-adjusted share is calculated as net debt at December 31, 2018 divided by the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE at December 31, 2018, plus common shares outstanding as of December 31, 2018.

(3)
Calculated using the future cumulative net cash flows of our wells drilled in 2018, measured as a percentage of 2018 drilling and completion capital invested utilizing budget prices for oil, NGL and natural gas.

        In addition, effective for 2018, our Compensation Committee approved changing the STIP payout determination weighting to 70% based on objective performance metrics and 30% based on subjective criteria. This change was also adopted by our board of directors.

2018 LTIP Target Award Levels

        Following consultation with FW Cook and a review of data associated with our peer group and the industry in general, our Compensation Committee determined that an adjustment was required to the long-term incentive percentage targets of certain of our named executive officers in order to continue to meet our objective of targeting the market median. Prior to 2018, target long-term incentive values


Table of Contents

for our named executive officers remained flat for the prior four years. The 2018 long-term incentive targets for our named executive officers are set out below.

Name
 2017 long-
term incentive
percentage
target
 2018 long-
term incentive
percentage
target
 

Randy A. Foutch

  525% 680%

Richard C. Buterbaugh

  400% 520%

Daniel C. Schooley

  300% 515%

Patrick J. Curth(1)

  300% %

Kenneth E. Dornblaser

  300% 300%

(1)
Effective March 1, 2018, Mr. Curth resigned from his position as Senior Vice President—Exploration and Land and transitioned to a non-executive, non-officer role as Senior Advisor in anticipation of his retirement in March of 2019, and therefore no longer has an LTIP target level.

2018 LTIP Awards

        Prior to the grant of performance unit awards in 2018 and following discussion with and input from FW Cook, the Compensation Committee also determined to change the structure of our LTIP program in two respects. First, for 2018, no stock options were granted to our named executive officers. Instead, their 2018 long-term incentive awards will consist of approximately 50% restricted shares and 50% performance unit awards.

        Second, with respect to performance unit awards granted in 2018, the amount of stock potentially payable at the end of the performance period will be determined151% based on three criteria: (i)performance metrics:

1.1/3rd weighting on relative three-yearthree year total shareholder return comparing the Company'sCompany’s shareholder return to the shareholder return of the selected peer group ("(“RTSR Performance Percentage"Performance”), (ii)
2.1/3rd weighting on absolute three-year total shareholder return ("(“ATSR Appreciation"Appreciation”) and (iii)
3.1/3rd weighting on three-year return on average capital employed ("(“ROACE”).
Below are tables that summarize the thresholds for each performance metric. All points between the respective levels will be interpolated and the RTSR Factor, ATSR Factor and ROACE Percentage"). Factor will be adjusted accordingly.
RTSR Performance Percentage ThresholdsRTSR Factor
Below 30th Percentile
0%
30th Percentile
50%
60th Percentile
100%
90th Percentile
200%
ATSR Appreciation ThresholdsATSR Factor
Below 10%0%
10%25%
35%100%
60% and above200%
ROACE Percentage ThresholdsROACE Factor
10% and below0%
25%100%
35% and above200%
The 2020 performance unit awards resulted in an RTSR Performance Percentage,of 59th percentile compared to the peer group, an ATSR Appreciation of 82% and an ROACE of 30%, which translates into an RTSR Factor, ATSR Factor and ROACE PercentageFactor of 99%, 200% and 155%, respectively, and together, a Performance Multiple of 151%.
See page 70 for the performance unit award peer group used for the 2020 Performance Unit Awards.


58Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
Other Benefits
Each NEO is also eligible for the below listed benefits from the Company.
Health and Welfare Benefits
Our NEOs are eligible to participate in all of our employee health and welfare benefit plans on the same basis as other employees (subject to applicable law). These plans include life, medical, vision and dental insurance, dependent care flexible spending account, medical flexible spending account or health savings account, as well as short and long-term disability benefits. These benefits ensure that we are able to competitively attract and retain officers and other employees. This is a fixed component of compensation, and these benefits are provided on a non-discriminatory basis to all employees.
Retirement Benefits
Our NEOs also participate in our defined contribution plan under Code Section 401(k), on the same basis as our other employees. The plan allows eligible employees to make contributions up to 100% of their annual compensation, not to exceed annual limits established by the federal government. We make matching contributions in cash of up to 6% of an employee’s eligible compensation and may make additional discretionary contributions in the form of cash. For our NEOs, we do not have a deferred benefit pension plan or non-qualified deferred compensation.
Perquisites
We believe that the total mix of compensation and benefits provided to our executive officers is currently competitive and, therefore, perquisites do not play a significant role in our executive officers’ total compensation. Nevertheless, Vital provides limited perquisites and benefits to its officers, including an annual physical and monthly dues at a downtown lunch/dinner club.
A Charitable Matching Gift Program is offered to all Vital employees and members of our Board of Directors. This program is a way the Company can support employees and board members in their efforts to give back to the communities in which they work and live. The Company will match dollar-for-dollar contributions made by employees or members of our Board of Directors, up to $1,000 per calendar year. Gifts will only be matched if they are requested for organizations eligible under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code. The minimum contribution that will be matched is $100 per calendar year. In order for the Company to provide the matching gift, there can be no direct benefit, reward or consideration to the employee or board member when making the donation.


Executive Compensation Matters59
Material Changes for 2023 Executive Compensation
As part of its annual compensation review, the Compensation Committee, with the assistance of WTW, reviewed the peer group used to benchmark our compensation structure. The Compensation Committee adjusts the compensation peer group on an annual basis to add or remove companies due to size, revenue, geographic basin, bankruptcies and mergers. Our Compensation Committee and Board reviewed and discussed these recommendations and ultimately adopted the below peer group used to benchmark our 2023 compensation structure.
2023 Compensation Peer Group*
Callon Petroleum Company
Centennial Resource Development, Inc.
Civitas Resources, Inc.
Comstock Resources, Inc.
Coterra Energy, Inc.
Earthstone Energy, Inc.
Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation
Matador Resources Company
Murphy Oil Corporation
Northern Oil and Gas, Inc.
PDC Energy, Inc.
Ranger Oil Corporation
SM Energy Company
Talos Energy, Inc.
*      This peer group was used to develop competitive market data in the fall of 2022 to inform the 2023 executive compensation decisions.
Base Salary
Following an extended review of data provided by WTW with respect to target pay elements of our peer group, our Compensation Committee and our Board elected to increase the salary rates for 2023 for NEOs as indicated in the below table. The increases in the salaries for the NEOs are to better align their salary rates to our 2023 compensation peer group and reflect the overall macro-economic effects of wage inflation. Following these changes each of our NEOs remain within 7% of the 50th percentile for their respective positions for our 2023 compensation peer group.
Name2022 salary rate
($)
2023 salary rate
($)
Salary rate
percentage change
Jason Pigott775,000800,0003.2%
Bryan Lemmerman475,000500,0005.3%
Mark Denny375,000400,0006.7%
2023 STIP Target Percentages
Following consultation with WTW, our Compensation Committee determined not to change the individual STIP target percentages for our NEOs for the 2023 calendar year performance.
Name
2022 STIP target
percentage
(1)
2023 STIP target
percentage
(1)
STIP target
percentage charge
Jason Pigott125%125%—%
Bryan Lemmerman90%90%—%
Mark Denny85%85%—%
(1)The STIP target percentage is a percentage of salary rate.


60Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
2023 STIP Performance Metrics
For 2023, following review by our independent compensation consultant, our Compensation Committee recommended and the Board approved the objective STIP performance metrics and relative weightings reflected in the table below. Of the nine performance metrics used in 2022, three will be used again in 2023 (Spill Intensity, Operated Base performance, BOPD and Operated Wedge performance, CUM Type Curve BOPD), and one is used again with slight modification (Gross Inventory Added with a minimum 20% Drilling ROR (Well Count)). Under the Environmental metric, the 2022 metric of Contractor plus Employee TRIR was broken into two metrics (Contractor TRIR and Employee TRIR) and the Air Stewardship metric was replaced with Flaring Intensity to identifybetter reflect operational control. Finally, a new metric (Free Cash Flow, Excluding Acquisitions) was selected to align with the RTSR factor,Company’s focus on reducing debt.
The objective 2023 STIP performance metric results continue to establish 70% of the ATSR factortotal STIP payout percentage, while the remaining 30% is subjectively determined by the Compensation Committee considering the Company’s overall strategic performance in other areas. In making its annual determination regarding the subjective performance portion, the Compensation Committee consults with WTW to gain an independent perspective and ROACE factor, respectively, which are usedconsiders factors including company performance, market conditions and significant achievements during the prior year.
2023 STIP performance metric2022
Results
Minimum
Threshold
TargetStretch
Target
Relative
weighting
Environmental and Safety     
Spill Intensity(1)
0.021 0.030 0.020 0.010 5.0 %
Flaring Intensity(2)
1.1602.5001.100 0.350 5.0 %
Contractor TRIR(3)
0.780 0.797 0.619 0.405 5.0 %
Employee TRIR(4)
0.000 0.700 0.350 0.000 5.0 %
Operated Base Performance, BOPD(5)
-3.3%-2.5%0.0%3.0%20.0 %
Operated Wedge Performance, CUM Type Curve
BOPD(6)
0.0%-6.5%0.0%8.0%20.0 %
Free Cash Flow, Excluding Acquisitions ($MM)(7)
$220 $(78)$64 $203 20.0 %
Gross Inventory Added with a minimum
20% Drilling ROR (Well Count)(8)
97 60 90 180 20.0 %
(1)Spill Intensity: Produced fluid (both crude oil and produced water) greater than or equal to compute the "Performance Multiple" and ultimately to determine the final1 BBL released per thousand barrels of gross operated combined liquid production outside of lined secondary containment.
(2)Flaring Intensity: Ratio of total gross operated gas flared per total gross operated gas produced as of 12/31/2023.
(3)Contractor TRIR: Total number of shares associated with each performance share unit granted atcontractor recordable injuries x 200,000 over the maturity date (with all partial shares rounded,total number of hours worked by contractors.
(4)Employee TRIR: Total number of employee recordable injuries x 200,000 over the total number of hours worked by employees.
(5)Operated Base Performance: Actual 2023 gross operated oil production volume from base producing wells measured as appropriate).

        In computing the Performance Multiple,percentage over / under the RTSR Factorforecast supporting the Board of Directors approved 2023 Budget. Base producing well set is given a 25% weight, the ATSR Factor a 25% weight and the ROACE Factor a 50% weight so that the Performance Multiple is equaldefined as any well having sustained oil production greater than 200 BOPD prior to (.25) RTSR Factor + (.25) ATSR Factor + (.50) ROACE Factor.

        We refer you to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 23, 2018 for a complete copy11/1/2022.

(6)Operated Wedge Performance: The average gross cumulative oil production of the 20182023 development program measured as the average percentage over / under the forecast supporting the Board of Directors approved 2023 Budget. Wedge producing well set is defined as any well having sustained oil production greater than 200 BOPD between 11/1/2022 and 10/31/2023.
(7)Free Cash Flow: Consolidated EBITDAX less interest expense and incurred capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions, changes in working capital and non-cash charges. The calculation of Free Cash Flow for the 2023 STIP performance unit agreement,metric differs from the non-GAAP financial measure of Free Cash Flow as disclosed in the 2022 Annual Report.
(8)Gross Inventory Added: Gross inventory added via acquisitions or improved economics on existing acreage that meets or exceeds an IRR of 20%.


Executive Compensation Matters61
2023 LTIP Target Percentage
Following consultation with WTW, our Compensation Committee decided to change the individual LTIP target percentages for our NEOs for the 2023 calendar year performance as indicated in the below table to better align their LTIP targets to approximately the 50th percentile of our 2022 compensation peer group. In addition, the Compensation Committee considered additional factors in making their determination including Exhibit A thereto, which containspast performance, criticality to the business and potential future individual growth.
Name
2022 long-term
incentive target
percentage
(1)
2023 long-term
incentive target
percentage
(1)
LTIP target
percentage
change
Jason Pigott516%625%21%
Bryan Lemmerman375%420%12%
Mark Denny250%275%10%
(1)The LTIP target percentage is a more complete explanationpercentage of the performance goals.

salary rate.

2023 LTIP Awards
The number of shares of restricted stock awards, share-settledand performance units as well as a one-time restricted stock award granted in recognition of the successful sale of Medallion, granted on February 16, 201815, 2023 to our named executive officers,NEOs are outlinedpresented below. These grants were calculated based on the average closing price of our common stock for the 10 trading days endedending on the day before the Board meeting held on February 15, 2018 (the filing date of our 2017 Annual Report).9, 2023. This 10-day average closing price was $8.28.


Table of Contents

        The grant quantities and the fair values, made in accordance with the applicable accounting principles footnoted below, were as follows:

$54.57.
 
  
 Restricted stock(1) Share-settled
performance
units(2)
 Medallion Award(3) 
Name
 Grant date Number of
shares of
stock
 Grant date
fair value ($)
 Number of
units
 Grant date
fair value ($)
 Number of
shares of
stock
 Grant date
fair value ($)
 

Randy A. Foutch

  2/16/2018  348,213  2,911,061  348,213  3,210,524  104,469  873,361 

Richard C. Buterbaugh

  2/16/2018  157,005  1,312,562  157,005  1,447,586  44,082  368,526 

Daniel C. Schooley

  2/16/2018  130,616  1,091,950  130,616  1,204,280  25,966  217,076 

Patrick J. Curth

  2/16/2018          27,174  227,175 

Kenneth E. Dornblaser

  2/16/2018  67,935  567,937  67,935  626,361  25,966  217,076 

  
Restricted stock(1)
Performance units(2)
NameGrant dateShares of
stock
(#)
Grant-date
fair value
($)
Units
(#)
Grant-date
fair value
($)
Jason Pigott2/15/202345,813 $2,533,001 45,812 $3,235,702 
Bryan Lemmerman2/15/202319,241 $1,063,835 19,241 $1,358,992 
Mark Denny2/15/202310,079 $557,268 10,078 $711,809 
(1)
The restricted stocks' grant datestocks’ grant-date fair value is computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and is determined based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on February 16, 2018,15, 2023, which was $8.36$55.29 per share. These shares vest 33%, 33% and 34% on a time basis per year beginning on the first anniversary date of the grant.

(2)
The $9.22combined $70.63 per unit grant dategrant-date fair value was computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and consists of a (i) $10.08$85.97 per unit grant dategrant-date fair value, determined utilizing a Monte Carlo simulation, for the combined (.25) RTSR Factor and (.25) ATSR Factor(50%) PSU Matrix Component and (ii) $8.36$55.29 per unit grant dategrant-date fair value, for the (.50) ROACE Factor determined based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on February 16, 2018.15, 2023, for the (20%) Net Debt/Consolidated EBITDAX Component, (15%) Inventory Growth Component and (15%) ESG Component. These share-settled performance units will be settled in common shares, cash or a combination of common stock and cash, have a three-year cliff vest and a performance period of January 1, 20182023 to December 31, 2020.

(3)
2025. See page 62 for additional information on these performance units.


62Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
2023 Performance Unit Award Performance Metrics and Peer Group
The restricted stockperformance unit awards were granted in 2023 have a performance period of January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2025. The Compensation Committee and the Board approved the performance unit award performance criteria as follows:
1.50% weighting on a PSU Matrix, which has two components:
a.Annual relative total shareholder return comparing the Company’s shareholder return to recognize the successful saleshareholder return of Medallion while also aligning the equity awardE&P companies listed in the Russell 2000 index listed in the below peer group table (“Relative TSR”).
b.Annual absolute total shareholder return (“Absolute Return”).
(collectively the “PSU Matrix Component”). The PSU Matrix Component is calculated on the basis of the following matrix:
Relative TSR (quartile)
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
1-Year
Absolute Return
<8%75%50%25%0%
≥ 8% and <14%100%75%50%25%
≥ 14% and <20%200%100%75%50%
≥20%250%200%100%75%
2.20% weighting on three-year Net Debt to Consolidated EBITDAX (“Net Debt/Consolidated EBITDAX Component”).
3.15% weighting on growth in inventory (“Inventory Growth Component”).
4.15% weighting on emissions reduction targets related to progress toward our 2025 emissions reductions targets, as described on page 11 (“ESG Component”).
The Compensation Committee and Board believe the revised PSU performance metrics align with the interestsCompany’s strategy of shareholders. The restricted stocks' grant date fair value is computedminimizing risk by lowering debt and seeking high margin inventory to grow the Company all while operating our assets in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and is determined based onan environmentally friendly manner. While understanding the closing priceneed to reduce the emissions profile of our common stock onassets.
The below table shows the NYSE on February 16, 2018, which was $8.36 per share. These shares have a one-year cliff vest.

Other Benefits

    Health and welfare benefits.

    Our named executive officers are eligiblepeer group used to participate in all of our employee health and welfare benefit plans onmeasure the same basis as other employees (subject to applicable law). These plans include medical, vision and dental insurance, dependent care flexible spending account, medical flexible spending account or health savings account, as well as short- and long-term disability benefits. These benefits are provided in order to ensure that we are able to competitively attract and retain officers and other employees. This is a fixed component of compensation, and these benefits are provided on a non-discriminatory basis to all employees.

    Retirement benefits.

    Our named executive officers also participate in our defined contribution plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") on the same basis as our other employees. The plan allows eligible employees to make contributions up to 100% of their annual compensation, not to exceed annual limits established by the federal government. We make matching contributions in cash of up to 6% of an employee's eligible compensation and may make additional discretionary contributions in the form of cash.

Table of Contents

    Perquisites.

    We believe that the total mix of compensation and benefits provided to our executive officers is currently competitive and, therefore, perquisites do not play a significant role in our executive officers' total compensation. Nevertheless, Laredo provides limited perquisites and benefits to its officers, including reimbursement for cell phone charges, information technology assistance and monthly dues at a downtown lunch/dinner club.

    A charitable matching gift program is offered to all Laredo employees and members of our board of directors. This program is a way the Company can support employees and board members in their efforts to give back to the communities in which they work and live. The Company will match dollar-for-dollar contributions made by employees or members of our board of directors, up to $1,000 per calendar year. Gifts will only be matched if they are requested for organizations eligible under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code. The minimum contribution that will be matched is $100 per calendar year. In orderPSU Matrix Component for the Company to provide the matching gift, there can be no direct benefit, reward or consideration to the employee or board member when making the donation.

    Other benefits.

    Effective January 1, 2013, we entered into an aircraft lease with Lariat Ranch LLC ("Lariat Ranch"), the aircraft owner and an entity controlled by Mr. Foutch, and our board of directors adopted a revised aircraft use policy. Under this arrangement, as amended in 2014 and 2015, we pay an hourly rate for the use of the aircraft and also pay for all operating costs associated with our use of the aircraft, as well as expenses related to the flight crew and other expenses during such use. For further details, see the "Summary compensation table" in "—Summary Compensation" and "TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS—Other Related-Party Transactions."

2023 performance unit awards.

Matador Resources
Murphy Oil Corp.
Chord Energy Corp.
Civitas Resources Inc.
Denbury Inc.
Magnolia Oil Gas Corp.
SM Energy
Kosmos Energy LTD
California Resources Corp.
CNX Resources Corp.
Northern Oil and Gas Inc.
Permian Resources Corp.
Callon Petroleum
Sitio Royalties Corp.
Talos Energy Inc.
Comstock Resources Inc.
Tellurian Inc
Ranger Oil Corp.
Gulfport Energy Corp
Berry
Earthstone Energy Inc.
W and T Offshore Inc.
Vaalco Energy Inc.
Crescent Energy
Riley Exploration Permian Inc.
Sandridge Energy Inc.
Amplify Energy Corp.
Silverbow Resources Inc.
Ring Energy Inc.
Highpeak Energy Inc.
Empire Petroleum Corp.
Battalion Oil Corp.


Executive Compensation Matters63
Employment, Severance or Change in Control Agreements

We do not currently maintain any long-term employment agreements. On November 9, 2011, the Company adopted the Laredo Petroleum,The Vital Energy, Inc. Change in Control Executive Severance Plan (as amended, the "Change“Change in Control and Executive Severance Plan"Plan”), which provides severance payments and benefits to our named executive officers and eligible persons with the title of vice president and above, as determined by our Compensation Committee. The policy provides an eligible participant with a lump-sum cash severance payment and continued health benefits in the event that the participant experiences a qualifying termination event within the 18-month period following the occurrence of a qualifying change in control event ("(“double trigger"trigger”). In the event that an eligible executive'sexecutive’s employment is terminated without cause by the employer or for good reason by the executive within the 18-month period following the occurrence of a change in control, the executive would become entitled to receive 100% (in the case of our Chief Executive Officer, 300%, and in the case of our other named executive officers, 200%) of the executive'sexecutive’s salary rate and 200% (in the case of our Chief Executive Officer, 300%, and in the case of our other named executive officers, 200%) of the executive'sexecutive’s target STIP cash bonus and prorated amount of such target STIP cash bonus for the fiscal year in which the change ofin control payment is triggered. In addition, the executive would receive Company-paid COBRA continuation coverage for up to 18 months following the date of termination. The policy contains a modified cutback provision whereby payments payable to an executive may be reduced if doing so would put the executive in a more advantageous after-tax provision than if payments were not reduced and the executive became subject to excise taxes under Section 4999 of the Code and loss of deduction under Section 280G of the Code. We believe these severance levels are comparable to those utilized by our peer group. Effective March 1, 2018, Mr. Curth resigned from his position as Senior Vice President—Exploration and Land and transitioned to a non-executive, non-officer role as Senior


Table of Contents

Advisor in anticipation of his retirement in March of 2019. If a Change in Control (as defined in the Change in Control and Executive Severance Plan) occurs within 12 months of March 1, 2018, all of Mr. Curth's outstanding equity awards will become fully vested and he will be entitled to receive severance payments (as defined in the Change in Control and Executive Severance Plan) based on his last full annual salary and bonus immediately prior to his resignation as Senior Vice President—Exploration and Land. Upon Mr. Curth's termination of employment as a Senior Advisor (and provided that no Change in Control occurs within 12 months of March 1, 2018), (i) all of Mr. Curth's outstanding equity awards will vest on an accelerated basis, subject to Mr. Curth's execution of a non-compete agreement and release of claims against the Company, (ii) medical, dental and vision plan coverage will end on the last day of the month in which the termination occurs and (iii) he will be entitled to COBRA coverage for 18 months after termination.

We believe that our Change in Control Executive Severance Plan, including its requirement of a "double“double trigger," provides suitable incentive for our officers to remain with the Company in the event of a potential change in control through the consummation of any such transaction. We further believe such an incentive is to the benefit of our stockholders as well as any potential purchaser in connection with a change in control transaction, as it helps to ensure the continued operation and seamless transition of the Company prior to and through the conclusion of any such transaction. The compensation "multipliers"“multipliers” among the different categories of our officers were established based upon information provided by FW Cookan independent compensation consultant regarding both our peer group and the industry in general.

Other Matters

Risk assessment

        The Compensation Committee and management have reviewed our compensation policies as generally applicable to our employees and believe that our policies do not encourage excessive and unnecessary risk-taking, and that the level of risk that they do encourage is not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.

        Our compensation philosophy and culture support the use of salary rate, cash bonuses and long-term incentive equity compensation that are generally uniform in design and operation throughout our organization and with all levels of employees.

Executive Severance Plan
In addition to the following specific factors,Change in particular, reduceControl Plan, the likelihood of excessive risk-taking:

        Furthermore, prior to our initial public offering in 2011, we provided our officers the opportunity to invest in our equity, which all of our named executive officers who wereand eligible persons with the Company attitle of vice president and above, as determined by our Compensation Committee. The Severance Plan provides an eligible participant with a lump-sum cash severance payment and continued health benefits in the time did, and now we provide our officers withevent of involuntary termination without cause or other termination due to a good reason. In the opportunityevent of a qualifying termination under the Severance Plan, the participant would become entitled to be awarded long-term incentive equity that continues to align their interests with thosereceive 100% (in the case of our stockholders.

        In summary, because the Compensation Committee focuses on the Company's performance, with only some consideration given to the specific individual performance of the employee when making compensation decisions, we believe our historical compensation programs did not, and our current compensation programs do not, encourage excessive and unnecessary risk taking by executive officers (or other employees). These programs were and are designed to encourage employees to remain focused on both our short- and long-term operational and financial goals. We set performance goals that we believe are appropriate in light of our past performance and market conditions. The Compensation Committee will continue to monitor all levels of compensation to attempt to ensure that no element of compensation encourages excessive and unnecessary risk-taking.


Table of Contents

Equity ownership guidelines

        The Compensation Committee recommended, and the board of directors approved, stock ownership guidelines for directors and the executive management team in order to further align the interest of our directors and officers with those of our stockholders. Individuals have three years from their hire, promotion or appointment date to reach the following stock ownership guidelines (as a multiple of salary rate): (i) Chief Executive Officer: 5x, (ii) PresidentOfficer, 200%, and Chief Operating Officer: 3x, (iii) Executive and Senior Vice Presidents: 2x, (iv) Vice Presidents: 1x and (v) directors: $400,000 worth of Company stock. Stock actually owned, as well as stock awarded under restricted stock awards, is included for purposes of satisfying these guidelines. No stock potentially exercisable under stock option awards is included. Based on the highest closing price of our common stock since March 9, 2018 ($8.96), all of our officers and directors have satisfied the stock ownership guidelines.

Compensation Consultant and Conflict of Interest Analysis

        Since July 2012, the Compensation Committee has engaged FW Cook to serve as its independent compensation adviser. FW Cook did not provide any services to the Company outside of the scope of its engagement by the Compensation Committee. In accordance with the requirements of Item 407(e)(3)(iv) of Regulation S-K, the Compensation Committee considered the relationships that FW Cook has had with the Company, the members of the Compensation Committee and our executive officers, as well as the policies that FW Cook has in place to maintain its independence and objectivity, and determined that no conflicts of interest arose from the work performed by FW Cook. It is anticipated that the relationship will continue during 2018. The Compensation Committee's objective when engaging FW Cook was to assess our level of competitiveness for executive-level talent and provide recommendations for attracting, motivating and retaining key employees, including identifying industry best practices.

        At the request of the Compensation Committee, FW Cook has undertaken comprehensive market reviews annually, which have been utilized by the Compensation Committee when making its recommendations to the Company's board of directors for the compensation programs, including adjustments to the current programs that were made in 2017 and later, as described above.

Tax and accounting implications

        In prior years, the Compensation Committee generally structured the Company's compensation program with the intent to preserve any deductions under Code Section 162(m), which generally limits the deductibility of annual compensation paid to a "covered employee" in excess of $1 million, unless certain exceptions are met, such as the exception for qualified performance-based compensation. Pursuant to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the "Tax Act") as of January 1, 2018, the exception under Code Section 162(m) for qualified performance-based compensation was eliminated and the definition of "covered employee" was expanded to include the chief financial officer and certain former named executive officers of a Company. The Tax Act includes a transition rule under which the changes to Code Section 162(m) will not apply to compensation payable pursuant to a written binding contract that was in effect on November 2, 2017, and is not materially modified after that date. However, given the loss of the qualified performance-based compensation exception, non-grandfathered awards may result in non-deductible compensation amounts.

Policies against hedging and pledging stock

        Under the terms of our Insider Trading Policy that is applicable to our directors and named executive officers, such persons are prohibited from engaging in hedging transactions that are designed to hedge or offset a decrease in market value of such person's common stock in the Company. We prohibit such conduct because to allow such activity, the director or officer could then no longer be


Table of Contents

exposed to the full risks of ownership and may no longer have the same objectives as the Company's other stockholders.

        In addition, our directors and named executive officers may not hold their Company securities in a margin account and may not, without prior approval and in very limited circumstances, pledge Company securities as collateral for any other loan. The only exception to the prohibition on pledging securities may exist in the case of a non-margin loan where the director or officer was clearly able to demonstrate the financial ability to repay the loan without resort to the pledged securities, and only if such pledge was pre-approved by our General Counsel. No shares owned by our directors orother named executive officers, 150%) of the participant’s salary rate and 100% (in the case of our Chief Executive Officer, 200%) of the participant’s target STIP cash bonus and prorated amount of such target STIP cash bonus for the fiscal year in which the change in control payment is triggered. The Severance Plan also provides for an amount in cash equal to the value of (i) the number of unvested restricted stock awards held by the participant multiplied by the closing stock price on the last trading day before the participant’s termination; plus (ii) the number of all other long-term compensation and equity awards not covered in (i) prorated based on the date of termination, multiplied by a current value of each such award. In addition, the participant would receive Company-paid COBRA continuation coverage for up to 18 months following the date of termination. We believe these severance levels are currently pledged.


Tablecomparable to those utilized by our peer group. The compensation “multipliers” among the different categories of Contents


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

our officers were established based upon information provided by WTW regarding both our peer group and the industry in general.



64Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
Compensation Committee Report
Our Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the boardBoard of directorsDirectors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors



Pamela S. Pierce,Dr. Craig M. Jarchow, Chair
James R. Levy, Member
Dr. Myles W. Scoggins, Member
Donald D. Wolf, Member

William E. Albrecht
Lisa Lambert
Dr. Shihab Kuran
The information contained in this Compensation Committee Report shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material"“soliciting material” or to be "filed"“filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates such information by reference in such filing.


Table of Contents

Summary Compensation

The following table summarizes, with respect to our named executive officers,NEOs, information relating to the compensation (as defined by the SEC) for services rendered in all capacities during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015.


Summary compensation table

2020.
Name and principal position
 Year Salary
($)(1)
 STIP
bonus
($)(1)
 Restricted
stock
awards
($)(2)
 Stock
option
awards
($)(2)
 Share-settled
performance
units
($)(2)
 All other
compensation
($)(3)
 Total
($)
 

Randy A. Foutch,

  2017  840,615  1,107,000  1,118,544  985,395  3,004,622  47,426  7,103,602 

Chairman and Chief

  2016  758,462  1,650,000  2,402,883  3,023,806  6,942,950  46,200  14,824,301 

Executive Officer

  2015  800,000  863,000  955,342  1,033,365  2,598,756  41,996  6,292,459 

Richard C. Buterbaugh,

  
2017
  
486,154
  
460,000
  
492,435
  
433,825
  
1,322,793
  
21,214
  
3,216,421
 

Executive Vice President and

  2016  440,856  680,000  1,064,134  1,339,115  3,074,728  19,914  6,618,747 

Chief Financial Officer

  2015  465,000  397,300  423,086  457,636  1,150,869  20,451  2,914,342 

Daniel C. Schooley,

  
2017
  
396,923
  
355,000
  
301,490
  
265,604
  
809,879
  
20,264
  
2,149,160
 

Senior Vice President—

  2016  344,865  550,000  719,938  712,758  1,636,557  19,464  3,983,582 

Operations

  2015  330,000  227,800  225,191  243,577  612,568  18,311  1,657,447 

Patrick J. Curth,

  
2017
  
389,308
  
347,000
  
294,713
  
259,626
  
791,654
  
23,058
  
2,105,359
 

Senior Vice President—

  2016  360,269  525,000  652,212  820,747  1,884,514  22,758  4,265,500 

Exploration and Land

  2015  380,000  278,700  259,310  280,485  705,381  19,601  1,923,477 

Kenneth E. Dornblaser,

  
2017
  
362,692
  
324,000
  
275,114
  
242,364
  
739,009
  
20,864
  
1,964,043
 

Senior Vice President and

  2016  331,827  485,000  600,721  755,954  1,735,733  11,579  3,920,814 

General Counsel

  2015  350,000  256,700  471,439  258,341  649,693  4,301  1,990,474 

Summary Compensation Table
Name and
principal position
Year
Salary
($)(1)
Restricted
stock awards
($)(2)
Performance
unit awards
($)(2)
Stock
awards
total ($)
Non-equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(1)(3)
All other
compensation
($)(4)
Total
($)
Jason Pigott
President and
Chief Executive Officer
2022764,423 1,930,846 2,585,986 4,516,832 764,423 36,190 6,081,868 
2021720,000 1,709,501 2,298,898 4,008,399 1,172,160 33,290 5,933,849 
2020720,000 906,152 850,899 1,757,051 792,000 27,535 3,296,586 
Bryan Lemmerman
Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial
Officer
2022468,269 1,825,290 1,151,621 2,976,911 337,154 77,736 3,860,070 
2021440,000 753,890 1,013,814 1,767,704 586,080 72,286 2,866,070 
2020209,846 771,559 N/A771,559 996,000 17,816 1,995,221 
Karen Chandler
Senior Vice President
and Chief Operating
Officer
2022329,154 941,296 1,260,679 2,201,975 — 10,476,287 13,007,416 
2021466,154 954,848 1,284,059 2,238,907 620,917 29,042 3,355,020 
2020450,000 525,475 493,434 1,018,909 382,500 23,342 1,874,751 
Mark Denny
Senior Vice President–
General Counsel
& Secretary
2022370,192 453,256 607,047 1,060,303 251,731 22,325 1,704,551 
2021345,192 395,783 532,240 928,023 434,252 22,490 1,729,957 
2020325,000 194,815 182,936 377,751 276,250 19,590 998,591 
(1)
The amounts presented in these columns reflect the actual amounts earned in 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, even if paid in another year.

(2)
For the 20172022, 2021 and 2015 LTIP2020 equity-based awards, the amounts presented in these columns reflect the grant dategrant-date fair value of thevalue. The restricted stock awards, stock option awardsaward amount for Mr. Lemmerman in 2020 is for a one-time new hire award granted on July 1, 2020.
(3)The amounts presented in this column includes the STIP award payout, if applicable, and share-settled performance unit awards computeda one-time cash signing award to Mr. Lemmerman in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For the 2016 LTIP awards, on February 9, 2016, our board2020 of directors approved the value for grants to the named executive officers. The closing price of our stock on this date was $6.10. In accordance with prior practice, the number of shares of restricted stock awards, stock option awards and share-settled performance units to be issued pursuant to such approval were calculated based on the average closing price of our stock for the 10 trading days ended February 19, 2016 (two days after the filing of our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K). This 10-day average closing price was $5.40. As previously noted, these grants were contingent on the subsequent approval of the amendment to our Equity Incentive Plan by our stockholders. If the grant of these shares had not been subject to subsequent stockholder approval, the shares would have been valued using the February 19, 2016 closing price of $4.10 in compliance with applicable accounting principles. On May 25, 2016, our stockholders approved the amendment to our Equity Incentive Plan. On May 25, 2016 the closing price of our stock was $12.36. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, the restricted stock awards, stock option awards and share-settled performance unit awards were valued on the date of stockholder approval. Please refer to Note 7 to our audited consolidated financial statements in our 2017 Annual Report for disclosures regarding fair value estimates of restricted stock awards, stock option awards and share-settled performance unit awards.

(3)
$600,000.
(4)The amounts presented in this column include the aggregate value of matching contributions to our 401(k) plan, the dollar values of life insurance coverage, charitable gifts made on behalf of named executive officersthe NEOs pursuant to our charitable gift matching program, Severance, Unused Vacation, wellness reimbursements and wellness reimbursements. Each of our named executive officershealth savings contributions, among other items. For all other compensation details related to 2022, please see the below “All Other Compensation” table.



Executive Compensation Matters65
All Other Compensation Table
401(k)
match
($)
Health
savings match
($)
Life insurance
coverage
($)
Charitable
gifts match
($)
Temporary housing
arrangement
($)
Severance
($)
Unused vacation
($)
Continued medical
($)
Total all other
compensation
($)
Jason Pigott18,300 N/A810 17,080 N/AN/AN/AN/A36,190 
Bryan Lemmerman18,300 1,500 810 14,000 43,126 N/AN/AN/A77,736 
Karen Chandler(1)
18,300 N/A860 15,800 N/A10,420,145 7,263 13,919 10,476,287 
Mark Denny18,300 N/A540 3,485 N/AN/AN/AN/A22,335 
(1)Dr. Chandler received matching contributions to our 401(k) plan of $16,200 for 2017. The amounts presentedcertain payments and benefits in this column for Mr. Foutch include the aggregate incremental cost of expenses that were paid by usconnection with her involuntary departure on August 24, 2022, pursuant to the terms of the Aircraft Lease (as defined below) and our aircraft use policy, which would otherwise have been paid by Lariat Ranch, an entity controlled by Mr. Foutch, for the use of Lariat Ranch's aircraft not directly related to Laredo's business. These payments during the years 2017, 2016 and 2015, were $23,868, $23,442 and $22,371 respectively, and they represent only a portion of the total costs incurred by Lariat Ranch of flying the aircraft. For further details, please see "TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS—Other Related-Party Transactions."Company’s Executive Severance Plan.

Table of Contents

Realized Compensation

The calculation of total compensation, as shown in the Summary Compensation Table, on page 46, includes items driven by accounting assumptions as defined by the SEC. As a result, total compensation as defined by the SEC differs substantially from the compensation actually realized by our named executive officersNEOs in a particular year. To supplement the SEC-required disclosure, the table below shows compensation actually realized by the named executive officers.NEOs. These amounts are not a substitute for the amounts reported as total compensation as defined by the SEC. Realized compensation includes each named executive officer'sNEOs’ earned salary, earned STIP bonus,cash awards, value realized on vesting of stock awards, value realized on exercise of stock options, value realized on vesting of share-settled and cash-settled performance unit awards and all other compensation, which includes matching contributions to our 401(k) plan, the dollar values of life insurance coverage, charitable gifts made on behalf of named executive officersNEOs pursuant to our charitable gift matching program, wellness reimbursements and wellness reimbursements.

health savings contributions, among other items.

The following table summarizes, with respect to our named executive officers,NEOs, information relating to the realized compensation earned for services rendered in all capacities during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015.

2020.
Realized compensation
Name202220212020
Jason Pigott$8,396,829 $3,552,764 $1,807,413 
Bryan Lemmerman$2,715,390 $2,891,680 $1,223,662 
Karen Chandler$13,865,985 $1,682,864 $978,892 
Mark Denny$1,660,475 $1,011,029 $662,752 
 
 Realized compensation 
Name
 2017 2016 2015(1) 

Randy A. Foutch(2)

 $4,261,781 $2,739,655 $5,229,936 

Richard C. Buterbaugh

 $1,971,210 $1,257,081 $2,513,572 

Daniel C. Schooley

 $1,318,351 $1,005,663 $1,046,781 

Patrick J. Curth

 $1,648,098 $984,246 $1,592,260 

Kenneth E. Dornblaser

 $1,274,237 $895,537 $1,319,589 


(1)
A portion of the value realized on vesting of stock awards are the restricted unit awards in our predecessor Laredo Petroleum, LLC ("Laredo LLC") that vested during the year ended December 31, 2015, which were exchanged in connection with the corporate reorganization and initial public offering.

(2)
The amounts presented for Mr. Foutch include the aggregate incremental cost of expenses that were paid by us pursuant to the terms of the Aircraft Lease (as defined below) and our aircraft use policy, which would otherwise have been paid by Lariat Ranch, an entity controlled by Mr. Foutch, for the use of Lariat Ranch's aircraft not directly related to Laredo's business. For further details, please see "TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS—Other Related-Party Transactions."
66Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement

        The lower comparative realized compensation in 2016 is mainly due to (i) the lower price of our common stock at the time of the vesting of stock awards during 2016 and (ii) there being no performance awards vesting in 2016, whereas there were share-settled performance awards vesting in 2017 and cash-settled performance awards vesting in 2015.


Table of Contents

Grants of Plan-Based Awards for the Year Ended December 31, 2017

2022

The following table provides information concerning each stock award (referred to in the table collectively as "stock awards") granted to our named executive officersNEOs under any plan that was transferred during the year ended December 31, 2017.2022. The grant-date fair values presented in the following table were computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 as described in Note 79 to our audited consolidated financial statements in our 20172022 Annual Report, and not the value used in accordanceGrant Value.
Estimated future payouts under non-equity incentive plan awards(1)
All other stock awards: Number of shares of stock(2)
(#)
 Estimated future payout under equity incentive plan awards (Performance units)(3)
Grant-date fair value of stock awards ($)
NameGrant date
Threshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)
Threshold
(#)(4)
Target
(#)(5)
Maximum
(#)(6)
Jason Pigott2/22/2022477,765 955,529 1,911,058 28,810 10,804 28,810 64,823 4,516,832 
Bryan Lemmerman2/22/2022210,721 421,442 842,884 27,235  4,81112,830 28,868 2,976,911 
Karen Chandler(7)
2/22/2022N/AN/AN/A14,045 N/AN/AN/A2,201,975 
Mark Denny2/22/2022157,332 314,663 629,326 6,763  2,5366,763 15,217 1,060,303 
(1)Estimated future payout is based on the Company’s achievement over a one-year period of the 2022 STIP metrics, along with determining the grant numbers awarded.


Grants of plan-based awards tableeach individual’s 2022 STIP target percentage. See page 55 for the year ended December 31, 2017

2022 STIP metrics and 2022 individual STIP targets. In order to determine the value of “Threshold”, “Target” and “Maximum” payout, achievements over a one-year period of 50%, 100% and 200% of the 2022 STIP target percentage were utilized, respectively.
 
  
 Restricted stock(1) Stock options(2) Share-settled
performance units(3)
 Share-settled performance
units estimated future payout
in shares(4)
 
Name
 Grant
date
 Number
of shares
of stock
 Grant date
fair value
($)
 Number of
shares of
stock
 Grant date
fair value
($)
 Number of
units
 Grant date
fair value
($)
 Threshold Target Maximum 

Randy A. Foutch

  2/17/2017  79,217  1,118,544  119,826  985,395  158,434  3,004,622  79,217  158,434  316,868 

Richard C. Buterbaugh

  2/17/2017  34,875  492,435  52,754  433,825  69,751  1,322,793  34,876  69,751  139,502 

Daniel C. Schooley

  2/17/2017  21,352  301,490  32,298  265,604  42,705  809,879  21,353  42,705  85,410 

Patrick J. Curth

  2/17/2017  20,872  294,713  31,571  259,626  41,744  791,654  20,872  41,744  83,488 

Kenneth E. Dornblaser

  2/17/2017  19,484  275,114  29,472  242,364  38,968  739,009  19,484  38,968  77,936 

(1)
(2)The restricted stocks' grant datestock’s grant-date fair value is determinedwas based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on February 17, 2017,22, 2022, which was $14.12$67.02 per share. These shares vest 33%, 33% and 34% on a time basis per year beginning on the first anniversary date of the grant.

(2)
We utilizegrant, except for a one-time retention grant of 14,405 shares included in Mr. Lemmerman’s 2022 restricted stock awards which will cliff-vest at the Black-Scholes option pricing model to measureend of the third anniversary of the grant datedate.
(3)The combined grant-date fair value per performance unit is $89.76. See the table below for additional information. These performance units are payable in stock upon a three-year cliff vest based on achievement of stock option awards granted under our Equity Incentive Plan. Stock option awards vest and become exercisable in four equal installments onspecific levels for each of the four anniversariesPSU Matrix Component, Net Debt/Consolidated EBITDAX Component, Inventory Growth Component and ESG Component, with achieved points between levels to be interpolated, for the performance period of January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2024.
(4)In order to determine the grant date. These stock option“Threshold” number of units, an achievement over a three-year period of 50% PSU Matrix performance equaling 25% (12.5% of total performance units payable in stock), 20% Net Debt/Consolidated EBITDAX equaling 1.75 (10% of total performance units payable in stock), 15% Inventory Growth equaling 165 wells added (7.5% of total performance units payable in stock), 15% ESG emissions reduction equaling 8% (7.5% of total performance units payable in stock) were utilized, resulting in an aggregate of 37.5% of total performance units payable in stock.
(5)In order to determine the “Target” number of units, an achievement over a three-year period of 50% PSU Matrix performance equaling 100% (50% of total performance units payable in stock), 20% Net Debt/Consolidated EBITDAX equaling 1.5 (20.0% of total performance units payable in stock), 15% Inventory Growth equaling 275 wells added (15% of total performance units payable in stock), 15% ESG emissions reduction equaling 16% (15% of total performance units payable in stock) were utilized were utilized, resulting in an aggregate of 100% of total performance units payable in stock.
(6)In order to determine the “Maximum” number of units, an achievement over a three-year period of 50% PSU Matrix performance equaling 250% (125.0% of total performance units payable in stock), 20% Net Debt/Consolidated EBITDAX equaling 1.0 (40% of total performance units payable in stock), 15% Inventory Growth equaling 385 wells added (30% of total performance units payable in stock), 15% ESG emissions reduction equaling 22% (30% of total performance units payable in stock) were utilized were utilized, resulting in an aggregate of 225% of total performance units payable in stock.
(7)Effective August 24, 2022, upon her involuntary departure from the Company, Dr. Chandler's unvested awards have an exercise price of $14.12were forfeited.
The following table presents the grant-date fair values per share, whichperformance unit computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718:
February 22, 2022
Market criteria:50% PSU Matrix Component
Grant-date fair value per performance unit(1)
$112.49
Performance criteria:
20% Net Debt/Consolidated EBITDAX Component
+ 15% Inventory Growth Component
+ 15% ESG Component
Grant-date fair value per performance unit(2)
$67.02
Combined grant-date fair value per performance unit$89.76
(1)The grant-date fair value per performance unit for the 50% PSU Matrix Component was determined utilizing a Monte Carlo simulation.
(2)The grant-date fair value per performance unit for the February 17, 201720% Net Debt/Consolidated EBITDAX Component, 15% Inventory Growth Component and 15% ESG Component was determined based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE and an expiration date of February 17, 2027.

(3)
We utilize a Monte Carlo simulation to measureon the share-settled performance units' grant date fair value. These share-settled performance units have a three-year cliff vest and a performance period of January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2019.

(4)
As noted on page 34, performance units are payable in stock for achievement of a "Threshold" level of performance, i.e.date.


Executive Compensation Matters67
Vital Energy, achievement over a three-year period of TSR performance equaling the 40th percentile (50% of performance units payable in stock), at the "Target" level of performance, i.e., achievement over a three-year period of TSR performance equaling the 60th percentile (100% of performance units payable in stock) and are also payable for achievement of the "Maximum" level of performance, i.e., achievement over a three-year period of TSR performance equaling or exceeding the 80th percentile (200% of performance units payable in shares). All intervening percentages are directly interpolated. In the event that the "Start Average Stock Price" is greater than the "End Average Stock Price" plus "Dividends" (as such terms are defined in the award agreement), then, unless otherwise determined by the board of directors or Compensation Committee, the TSR modifier shall be no greater than 150%.

Laredo Petroleum, Inc. Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan

Under the Equity Incentive Plan, awards of stock options, including both incentive stock options and non-statutorynonstatutory stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and restricted stock units, stock bonus awards, performance unit awards and performance compensation awards (payable in cash or otherwise) may be granted. Subject to adjustment for certain corporate events, 24,350,0002,432,500 shares is currently the maximum number of shares of our common stock authorized and reserved for issuance under the Equity Incentive Plan.

        Eligibility.

Eligibility
Our employees, consultants and directors and those of our affiliated companies, as well as those whom we reasonably expect to become our employees, consultants and directors or those of our affiliated companies are eligible for awards, provided that incentive stock options may be granted only to employees. A written agreement between us and each participant will evidence the terms of each award granted under the Equity Incentive Plan.

Shares subjectSubject to the Equity Incentive Plan.Plan
The shares that may be issued pursuant to awards arewill be our common stock, $0.01 par value per share, and currently the maximum aggregate amount of common stock thatwhich may be issued upon exercise of all awards under the Equity Incentive Plan, including incentive stock options, may not exceed 24,350,0002,432,500 shares, subject to adjustment to reflect


Table of Contents

certain corporate transactions or changes in our capital structure. In addition, currently (i) the maximum number of shares with respect to which stock options and/or stock appreciation rights may be granted to any participant in any one-yearone year period is limited to 14,350,000717,500 shares, (ii) the maximum number of shares with respect to which incentive stock options may be granted to any participant in any one year period under the Equity Incentive Plan may not exceed 14,350,000717,500 shares, (iii) no more than 14,350,000717,500 shares may be earned in respect of performance unitcompensation awards denominated in shares granted to any single participant for a single calendar year during a performance period, or in the event that the performance unitcompensation award is paid in cash, other securities, other awards or other property, no more than the fair market value of 14,350,000717,500 shares of common stock on the last day of the performance period to which the award related, and (iv) the maximum amount that can be paid to any single participant in one calendar year pursuant to a cash bonus award is $5 million, and awards in respect of no more than 1,435,000 shares may be granted to any non-employee director in a single calendar year, in each case, subject to adjustment for certain corporate events.

In addition, no more than 71,750 shares of common stock may be issued in respect of awards granted to any single participant who is a non-employee director for a single calendar year.

If any award under the Equity Incentive Plan expires or otherwise terminates, in whole or in part, without having been exercised in full, the common stock withheld from issuance under that award will become available for future issuance under the Equity Incentive Plan. If shares issued under the Equity Incentive Plan are reacquired by us pursuant to the terms of any forfeiture provision, those shares will become available for future awards under the Equity Incentive Plan. Awards that can only be settled in cash will not be treated as shares of common stock granted for purposes of the Equity Incentive Plan.

        Administration.

Administration
Our boardBoard of directors,Directors, or a committee of members of our boardBoard of directorsDirectors appointed by our boardBoard of directors,Directors, may administer the Equity Incentive Plan, and that administrator is referred to in this summary as the "administrator." Currently, the Compensation Committee serves as the administrator.“administrator.” Among other responsibilities, the administrator selects participants from among the eligible individuals, determines the number of shares of common stock that will be subject to each award and determines the terms and conditions of each award, including exercise price, methods of payment and vesting schedules. Our boardBoard of directorsDirectors may amend or terminate the Equity Incentive Plan at any time. Amendments will not be effective without stockholder approval if stockholder approval is required by applicable law or stock exchange requirements.




68Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
Adjustments in capitalization.Capitalization
Subject to the terms of an award agreement, if there is a specified type of change in our common stock, such as extraordinary cash dividends, stock splits, reverse stock splits, recapitalizations, reorganizations, mergers, consolidations, combinations, exchanges or other relevant changes in capitalization, appropriate equitable adjustments or substitutions will be made to the various limits under, and the share terms of, the Equity Incentive Plan and the awards granted thereunder, including the maximum number of shares reserved under the Equity Incentive Plan, the maximum number of shares with respect to which any participant may be granted awards and the number, price or kind of shares of common stock or other consideration subject to awards to the extent necessary to preserve the economic intent of the award. In addition, subject to the terms of an award agreement, in the event of certain mergers, the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, our reorganization or liquidation, or our agreement to enter into any such transaction, the administrator may cancel outstanding awards and cause participants to receive, in cash, stock or a combination thereof, the value of the awards.

awards or provide for a substitution or assumption of awards, accelerating the exercisability of, lapse of restrictions on or termination of, awards, or providing for a period of time for exercise prior to the occurrence of such event.

Change in control.Control
In general, in the event of a change in control and the termination of the participant’s employment without cause or for good reason during the 18-month period immediately following a change in control, or if the successor to the Company does not assume or substitute awards under the Equity Incentive Plan, all options and stock appreciation rights subject to an award held by that participant will become fully vested and immediately exercisable and any restricted period imposed upon restricted awards of the participant will expire immediately (including a waiver of applicable performance goals). Accelerated exercisability and lapse of restricted periods will, to the extent practicable, occur at a time that allows participants to participate in the change in control. In the event of a change of control,addition, all incomplete performance periods will end, and any performance awards of the administrator will determine the extent to which performance goals have been met, and such awardsparticipant will be paid based upon such determination.


Tableassuming that the applicable target levels of Contents

performance have been attained. For the avoidance of doubt, equity awards that were outstanding as of May 20, 2021, and that are currently still outstanding, will continue to be subject to “single trigger” vesting.

Clawback policy.Policy
Awards grantedmade to officers of the Company under the Equity Incentive Plan on or after December 31, 2021 are subject to anythe Company’s executive compensation clawback policy adopted by the CompanyNovember 2021 and to the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, as amended, and the rules, regulations and binding, published guidance thereunder, which legislation provides for the clawback and recovery of incentive compensation in the event of certain financial statement restatements.

        Nontransferability.described herein.

Nontransferability
In general, each award granted under the Equity Incentive Plan may be exercisable only by a participant during the participant'sparticipant’s lifetime or, if permissible under applicable law, by the participant'sparticipant’s legal guardian or representative. Except in very limited circumstances, no award may be assigned, alienated, pledged, attached, sold or otherwise transferred or encumbered by a participant other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and any such purported assignment, alienation, pledge, attachment, sale, transfer or encumbrance will be void and unenforceable against us. However, the designation of a beneficiary will not constitute an assignment, alienation, pledge, attachment, sale, transfer or encumbrance.

Section 409A.409A
The provisions of the Equity Incentive Plan and the awards granted under the Equity Incentive Plan are intended to comply with or be exempt from the provisions of Section 409A of the Code and the regulations thereunder so as to avoid the imposition on any participant of an additional tax under Section 409A of the Code.

Registration Rights

        We are a party to a registration rights agreement pursuant to which we have granted certain registration rights to entities affiliated with Warburg Pincus that received shares of our common stock in the corporate reorganization consummated prior to our IPO.

thereunder.



Executive Compensation Matters69
Outstanding Equity Awards at 20172022 Fiscal Year-End

The following table provides information concerning restricted stock awards share-settledand performance unit awards that are not vested and stock option awards that had notare vested and exercisable for our named executive officersNEOs as of December 31, 2017.

2022.

Table of Contents


Outstanding equity awards tableEquity-Based Awards Table as of December 31, 2017

2022
 
  
 Restricted stock
awards
 Share-settled
performance unit
awards
  
  
  
  
 
 
  
 Stock option awards 
 
  
  
 Market
value of
shares not
vested(2)
  
 Market value
of units
not
vested(2)(3)
 
Name
 Grant date Shares not
vested(1)
 Units not
vested(3)
 Stock
options not
exercisable(4)
 Stock
options
exercisable
 Exercise
price
 Expiration
date
 

Randy A. Foutch

  2/17/2017  79,217 $840,492  79,217 $840,492  119,826   $14.12  2/17/2027 

  5/25/2016  130,254 $1,381,995  194,409 $2,062,679  232,584  77,527 $4.10  2/19/2026 

  2/27/2015  27,227 $288,878   $  83,952  83,952 $11.93  2/27/2025 

  2/27/2014   $   $  24,010  72,030 $25.60  2/27/2024 

  2/15/2013   $   $    128,709 $17.34  2/15/2023 

  2/3/2012   $   $    62,868 $24.11  2/3/2022 

Richard C. Buterbaugh

  
2/17/2017
  
34,875
 
$

370,024
  
34,876
 
$

370,034
  
52,754
  
 
$

14.12
  
2/17/2027
 

  5/25/2016  57,684 $612,027  86,095 $913,468  103,002  34,333 $4.10  2/19/2026 

  2/27/2015  12,058 $127,935   $  37,179  37,179 $11.93  2/27/2025 

  2/27/2014   $   $  10,633  31,899 $25.60  2/27/2024 

  2/15/2013   $   $    42,961 $17.34  2/15/2023 

Daniel C. Schooley

  
2/17/2017
  
21,352
 
$

226,545
  
21,353
 
$

226,555
  
32,298
  
 
$

14.12
  
2/17/2027
 

  5/25/2016  30,703 $325,759  45,825 $486,203  54,824  18,274 $4.10  2/19/2026 

  5/18/2016  13,636 $144,678   $     $   

  2/27/2015  6,418 $68,095   $  19,789  19,788 $11.93  2/27/2025 

  2/27/2014   $   $  5,658  16,980 $25.60  2/27/2024 

  2/15/2013   $   $    12,050 $17.34  2/15/2023 

  2/3/2012   $   $    6,975 $24.11  2/3/2022 

Patrick J. Curth(5)

  
2/17/2017
  
20,872
 
$

221,452
  
20,872
 
$

221,452
  
31,571
  
 
$

14.12
  
2/17/2027
 

  5/25/2016  35,355 $375,117  52,768 $559,868  63,130   $4.10  2/19/2026 

  2/27/2015  7,391 $78,419   $  22,787   $11.93  2/27/2025 

  2/27/2014   $   $  6,517  19,551 $25.60  2/27/2024 

  2/15/2013   $   $    33,330 $17.34  2/15/2023 

  2/3/2012   $   $    21,131 $24.11  2/3/2022 

Kenneth E. Dornblaser

  
2/17/2017
  
19,484
 
$

206,725
  
19,484
 
$

206,725
  
29,472
  
 
$

14.12
  
2/17/2027
 

  5/25/2016  32,564 $345,504  48,602 $515,667  58,146  19,382 $4.10  2/19/2026 

  3/6/2015  20,000 $212,200   $     $   

  2/27/2015  6,807 $72,222   $  20,988  20,988 $11.93  2/27/2025 

  2/27/2014   $   $  6,001  18,009 $25.60  2/27/2024 

  2/15/2013   $   $    26,348 $17.34  2/15/2023 

  2/3/2012   $   $    13,971 $24.11  2/3/2022 

Restricted stock
awards
Performance unit
awards
Stock option
awards
NameGrant
date
Number
of shares
not vested
(#)
(1)
Market
value of
shares
not vested
($)
(2)
Number of
unearned
units
not vested
(#)
(3)
Market
value of
units
not vested
($)
(2)
Number
of securities
underlying
unexercised
options
exercisable
(#)
Exercise
price
($)
Expiration
date
Jason
Pigott
2/22/202228,810 $1,481,410 21,608 $1,111,083 — $— 
3/9/202133,046 $1,699,225 83,354 $4,286,063 — $— 
3/5/202018,787 $966,028 83,432 $4,290,073 — $— 
Bryan
Lemmerman
2/22/202227,235 $1,400,424 9,623 $494,815 — $— 
3/9/202114,574 $749,395 36,759 $1,890,148 — $— 
7/1/202019,304 $992,612 — $— — $— 
Mark
Denny
2/22/20226,763 $347,753 5,072 $260,802 — $— 
3/9/20217,651 $393,414 19,298 $992,303 — $— 
3/5/20204,038 $207,634 17,936 $922,269 — $— 
2/17/2017— $— — $— 504 $282.40 2/17/2027
2/19/2016— $— — $— 1,338 $82.00 2/19/2026
(1)
Restricted shares granted in 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 20152020 vest 33%, 33% and 34% on a time basis per year beginning on the first anniversary date of the grant, with the following exceptions: (i) 13,636except for a one-time retention grant of 14,405 shares ofincluded in Mr. Lemmerman’s 2022 restricted stock awarded to Mr. Schooley on May 18, 2016 have a three-year cliff vest and (ii) 20,000 sharesawards which will cliff-vest at the end of restricted stock awarded to Mr. Dornblaser on March 6, 2015 have a three-year cliff vest.

the third anniversary of the grant date.
(2)
Market value is based on the $10.61$51.42 per share closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 29, 2017,30, 2022, the last trading day of the year.

(3)
The share-settled performance share unit awards granted on February 27, 2015March 5, 2020 had a performance period of January 1, 20152020 to December 31, 20172022, and as their performance criteria were not satisfied, resultingresulted in a TSR ModifierRTSR performance of 0% based on the Company finishing in the 36th59th percentile of itscompared to peer group, for relative TSR,an ATSR Appreciation of 82% and an ROACE of 30%, which translates into an RTSR Factor, ATSR Factor and ROACE Factor of 99%, 200% and 155%, respectively, and together, is the Performance Multiple of 151%. As such, the granted units vested and were not converted into common stockcash during the first quarter of 2018.2023 based on this Performance Multiple. For the May 25, 2016 and February 17, 2017 share-settledMarch 9, 2021 performance unit awards, the potential TSR Modifierpayout percentages for the PSU Matrix Component, Net Debt/Consolidated EBITDAX Component and Inventory Growth Component pursuant to the next highest performance level was at "threshold," resultingof 138%, 200% and 200%, respectively, results in a potential TSR ModifierPerformance Multiple of 50%169% based on their actual performance through December 31, 2017 each2022 attaining "below threshold" performance level. See page 340% for discussion of these awards' TSR Modifier.the PSU Matrix Component, 0.8 for the Net Debt/Consolidated EBITDAX Component and 386 wells for the Inventory Growth Component. The share-settled performance unit awards granted May 25, 2016March 9, 2021 have a performance period of January 1, 20162021 to December 31, 20182023, and any sharesunits earned under such awards are expected to be issuedsettled in cash in the first quarter of 20192024 if the market and/or performance and vesting criteria are met. For the February 22, 2022 performance unit awards, the potential payout percentages for the PSU Matrix Component, Net Debt/Consolidated EBITDAX Component, Inventory Growth Component and ESG Component pursuant to the next highest performance level of 25%, 200%, 50% and 100%, respectively, results in a potential Performance Multiple of 75% based on their actual performance through December 31, 2022 attaining 0% for the PSU Matrix Component, 1.22 for the Net Debt/Consolidated EBITDAX Component, 114 wells for the Inventory Growth Component and 16.1 for the ESG Component. The share-settled performance unit awards granted February 17, 201722, 2022 have a performance period of January 1, 20172022 to December 31, 20192024, and any sharesunits earned under such awards are expected to be issuedsettled in shares of the Company’s common stock in the first quarter of 20202025 if the market and/or performance and vesting criteria are met.

(4)
Stock option awards granted in 2017, 2016, 2015



70Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
Performance Unit Award Peer Groups*
Company202020212022
Amplify Energy Corp.
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
Antero Resources Corporation
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
Berry Corporation
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
Bonanza Creek, Energy Inc.
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
Brigham Minerals, Inc.
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
California Resources Corporation
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
Callon Petroleum Company
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
Chesapeake Energy Corporation
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
Civitas Resources, Inc.
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
CNX Resources Corporation
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
Comstock Resources, Inc.
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
Crescent Energy Company
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
Denbury Inc.
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
Earthstone Energy, Inc.
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
Evolution Petroleum Corporation
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
Extraction Oil & Gas, Inc.
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
Falcon Minerals
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
Gulfport Energy Corporation
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
HighPeak Energy, Inc.
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
HighPoint Resources Corporation
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
Kosmos Energy Ltd.
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
Magnolia Oil & Gas Corporation
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
Matador Resources Company
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
Montage Resources Corporation
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
Murphy Oil Corporation
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
Northern Oil & Gas, Inc.
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
Oasis Petroleum, Inc.
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
Ovintiv Inc.
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
PDC Energy, Inc.
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
PHX Minerals Inc.
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
PrimeEnergy Resources Corporation
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
QEP Resources, Inc.
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
Range Resources Corporation
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
Ranger Oil Corporation
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
Ring Energy, Inc.
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
SM Energy Company
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
Southwestern Energy Company
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
Talos Energy Inc.
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
Tellurian Inc.
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
W&T Offshore, Inc.
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
Whiting Petroleum Corp.
lpi-20230405_g74.jpg
*    Due to mergers and 2014 vestacquisitions, the Board approved removing Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc., Contango Oil & Gas Company, Goodrich Petroleum Corporation and become exercisable in four equal installments on each ofWhiting Petroleum Corp. from the first four anniversaries of2021 performance award peer group and removing Centennial Resource Development Inc, Falcon Minerals, Oasis Petroleum Inc. and Whiting Petroleum Corp. from the date of the grant.

(5)
Effective March 1, 2018, Mr. Curth resigned from his position as Senior Vice President—Exploration and Land and transitioned to a non-executive, non-officer role as Senior Advisor in anticipation of his retirement in March of 2019. Mr. Curth's outstanding unvested equity awards will continue to be eligible to vest in accordance with their terms until termination of his employment with the Company. Upon Mr. Curth's termination of employment or if a Change in Control (as defined in the Change in Control Executive Severance Plan) has occurred, all of Mr. Curth's outstanding equity awards will vest on an accelerated basis. However, if no Change in Control occurs within 12 months of March 1, 2018, such acceleration is subject to Mr. Curth's execution of a non-compete agreement and release of claims against the Company. The vested portion of his stock options will remain exercisable for 90 days following his retirement.
2022 performance peer group.


Executive Compensation Matters71
Stock Award Vestings, Stock Option Exercises and Performance Unit Vestings in Fiscal Year 2017

2022

The following table provides information concerning the vesting of stock awards, the exercise of stock options and the vesting of share-settled performance units during fiscal year 20172022 on an aggregated basis with respect to each of our named executive officers.


NEOs.

Stock award vestings, stock option exercisesAward Vestings, Stock Option Exercises and performance unit vestingsPerformance Unit Vestings for the year endedYear Ended December 31, 2017

2022
 
 Stock awards Stock options Share-settled performance
units
 
Name
 Shares
acquired on
vesting
 Value
realized
on vesting(1)
 Shares
acquired
on exercise
 Value
realized
on exercise(2)
 Shares
acquired
on vesting(3)
 Value
realized
on vesting(1)
 

Randy A. Foutch

  103,774 $1,456,969   $  58,215 $809,771 

Richard C. Buterbaugh

  45,957 $645,228   $  25,781 $358,614 

Daniel C. Schooley

  25,332 $355,291   $  13,722 $190,873 

Patrick J. Curth(4)

  28,166 $395,446  43,830 $273,494  15,801 $219,792 

Kenneth E. Dornblaser

  25,943 $364,235   $  14,554 $202,446 

Stock awardsStock optionsPerformance units
NameShares
acquired
on vesting
Value
realized
on vesting
(1)
Shares
acquired
on exercise
Value
realized
on exercise
Shares
acquired
on vesting
Value
realized
 on vesting(1)
Jason Pigott50,227 $4,423,981 — $— 31,450 $2,407,812 
Bryan Lemmerman25,912 $1,832,231 — $— — $— 
Karen Chandler24,379 $1,924,546 — $— 14,838 $1,135,997 
Mark Denny8,969 $707,767 — $— 4,029 $308,460 
(1)
The value realized upon vesting was calculated utilizing the closing stock price on the vesting date.

(2)
The value realized on exercise was calculated by multiplying
See page 57 for details regarding the number of exercised stock options by the difference between the exercise price and the closing stock price on the date of exercise.

(3)
Represents 75% of the share-settled performance units granted February 27, 2014 that were issued in common stock in the Company on February 27, 2017 and, as their performance and vesting criteria were satisfied, resulted in a TSR Modifier of 75% based on the Company finishing in the 50th percentile of its peer group for relative total shareholder return for the performance period of January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2016.

(4)
Effective March 1, 2018, Mr. Curth resigned from his position as Senior Vice President—Exploration and Land and transitioned to a non-executive, non-officer role as Senior Advisor in anticipation of his retirement in March of 2019. Mr. Curth's outstanding unvested equity awards will continue to be eligible to vest in accordance with their terms until termination of his employment with the Company. Upon Mr. Curth's termination of employment or if a Change in Control (as defined in the Change in Control Executive Severance Plan) has occurred, all of Mr. Curth's outstanding equity awards will vest on an accelerated basis. However, if no Change in Control occurs within 12 months of March 1, 2018, such acceleration is subject to Mr. Curth's execution of a non-compete agreement and release of claims against the Company. The vested portion of his stock options will remain exercisable for 90 days following his retirement.

        The share-settled2020 performance unit awards granted on February 27, 2015 had a performance period of January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017 and, as their performance criteria were not satisfied, resulting in a TSR Modifier of 0% based on the Company finishing in the 36th percentile of its peer group for relative TSR, the granted units lapsed and were not converted into common stockthat vested during the first quarter of 2018.

2023.

Pension Benefits

We maintain a 401(k) Plan for our employees, including our named executive officers,NEOs, but at this time we do not sponsor or maintain a pension plan for any of our employees.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

We do not provide a nonqualified deferred compensation plan for our employees at this time.


Table of Contents

Potential Payments uponUpon Termination or Change in Control

Severance

As described above, we do not maintain individual employment agreements. The Company has adopted the Change in Control ExecutivePlan and the Severance Plan, which providesprovide severance payments and benefits to our named executive officersNEOs and eligible persons with the title of vice president and above, as determined by our Compensation Committee. The policy provides an eligible participant with a lump sum cash severance payment and continued health benefitsSee Employment, Severance or Change in the event that the participant experiences a qualifying termination within the 18-month period following the occurrence of a qualifying change in control event. In the event that an eligible executive's employment is terminated without cause by the employer orControl Agreements for good reason by the executive within the 18-month period following the occurrence of a change in control, the executive would become entitled to receive 100% (in the case of our Chief Executive Officer, 300%, and in the case of our other named executive officers, 200%) of the executive's salary rate and 200% (in the case of our Chief Executive Officer, 300%) of the executive's target STIP bonus and prorated amount of such target STIP bonus for the fiscal year in which the change of control payment is triggered. In addition, the executive would receive company paid COBRA continuation coverage for up to 18 months following the date of termination. The policy contains a modified cutback provision whereby payments payable to an executive may be reduced if doing so would put the executive in a more advantageous after-tax provision than if payments were not reduced and the executive became subject to excise taxes.additional information. In order to be eligible for severance benefits under the policy,policies, our named executive officersNEOs have executed a confidentiality, non-disparagement and non-solicitation agreement. Effective March 1, 2018, Mr. Curth resigned from his position as Senior Vice President—Exploration and Land and transitioned to a non-executive, non-officer role as Senior Advisor in anticipation of his retirement in March of 2019. If a Change in Control (as defined in the Change in Control and Executive Severance Plan) occurs within 12 months of March 1, 2018, all of Mr. Curth's outstanding equity awards will become fully vested and he will be entitled to receive severance payments (as defined in the Change in Control and Executive Severance Plan) based on his last full annual salary and bonus immediately prior to his resignation as Senior Vice President—Exploration and Land. Upon Mr. Curth's termination of employment as a Senior Advisor (and provided that no Change in Control occurs within 12 months of March 1, 2018), (i) all of Mr. Curth's outstanding equity awards will vest on an accelerated basis, subject to Mr. Curth's execution of a non-compete agreement and release of claims against the Company, (ii) medical, dental and vision plan coverage will end on the last day of the month in which the termination occurs and (iii) he will be entitled to COBRA coverage for 18 months after termination.

Restricted Stock

The restricted stock may be affected by a named executive officer'sNEO’s termination of employment or the occurrence of certain corporate events. In the event of the termination of a named executive officer'sNEO’s employment by the Company, with or without cause, or the named executive officer'sNEO’s resignation for any reason, the named executive officerNEO will generally forfeit all restricted stock to us.



72Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
If the named executive officer'sNEO’s employment with the Company is terminated upon the death of the named executive officerNEO or because the named executive officerNEO is determined to be disabled by the boardBoard of directors,Directors, then all of his or her restricted stock will automatically vest. A named executive officerNEO will be considered to have incurred a "disability"“disability” in the event of the officer'sofficer’s inability to perform, even with reasonable accommodation, on a full-time basis the employment duties and responsibilities due to accident, physical or mental illness, or other circumstance; provided, however, that such inability continues for a period exceeding 180 days during any 12-month period.

In the event of a change ofin control, all restricted stock awards will become fully vested as of the date of the change ofin control, provided that the named executive officerNEO remains employed by the


Table of Contents

Company through the date of such change ofin control. For purposes of these restricted stock awards, a "change of control"“change in control” generally means:

(i)any person acquires beneficial ownership of our securities representing 40% or more of the combined voting power of our outstanding securities (provided, however, that if the surviving entity becomes a subsidiary of another entity, then the outstanding securities shall be deemed to refer to the outstanding securities of the parent entity), ;
(ii)a majority of the members of the boardBoard of directorsDirectors who were directors as of the date of the corporate reorganization no longer serve as directors; or
(iii)the consummation of a merger or consolidation of our companyCompany with any other entity, other than a merger or consolidation which would result in our voting securities outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent more than 40% of the combined voting power of our voting securities outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation.

Stock Options

Stock option awards may be affected by a named executive officer'sNEO’s termination of employment or the occurrence of certain corporate events. The unvested portion of a stock option award shall expire upon termination of employment, and the vested portion of a stock option award shall remain exercisable for (i) one year following termination of employment by reason of the holder'sholder’s death or disability, but not later than the expiration of the option period, or (ii) 90 days following termination of employment for any reason other than the holder'sholder’s death or disability, and other than the holder'sholder’s termination of employment for cause. Both the unvested and the vested but unexercised portion of a stock option award shall expire upon the termination of the option holder'sholder’s employment or service by the Company for cause.

In the event of a change ofin control (which for these purposes is the same as described for restricted stock above), provided that the named executive officerNEO remains employed by the Company through the date of such change of in control, all stock option awards will become fully vested and exercisable with respect to all shares of common stock covered thereby as of the date of the change ofin control.

Performance Unit Awards

Performance unit awards may be affected by a named executive officer'sNEO’s termination of employment or the occurrence of certain corporate events. If the executive'sexecutive’s employment with the Company is terminated by the Company for any reason, with or without cause, or the executive resigns (in either case, other than by reason of death or disability) prior to the maturity date of the performance unit award, then no amount shall generally be issued or paid in respect of the award. If, prior to the maturity date, the executive'sexecutive’s employment with the Company terminates either by reason of death or because the executive is determined by the boardBoard of directorsDirectors or the Compensation Committee to be subject to a disability, then the executive shall be eligible to receive a pro-ratedprorated performance unit award, taking into account the time that the executive was employed during the performance period prior to the date of such termination. The performance units granted to each recipient in 2016, 2017 and 2018
2020 are payable in cash in the first quarter of 2023 based on the Performance Multiple of 151%. The performance units granted to each recipient in 2021 and 2023 are payable in cash. The performance units granted to each recipient in 2022 are payable in cash, common stock of the Company. The performance criteria for the performance units awarded to each recipient in 2015 were not satisfied,Company or a combination of cash and the awarded units lapsed and were not converted into common stock, duringwith the first quarter of 2018.

current election being common stock.



Executive Compensation Matters73
In the event of a change ofin control (which for these purposes is the same as described for restricted stock above), provided that the named executive officerNEO remains employed by the Company through the date of such change ofin control, the "performance periods"“performance periods” in effect on the date the change ofin control occurs shall end on such date, and either the boardBoard of directorsDirectors or the Compensation Committee shall determine the extent to which the performance goals with respect to each such performance period have been met, based upon such audited or unaudited financial information or other information then available as it deems relevant. The boardBoard of directorsDirectors or Compensation Committee shall then cause each holder of performance unit awards to receive partial, full or fullno issuance of such awards for each performance period


Table of Contents

(including (including a potential range from 0% to 200%225%), based on the boardBoard of directors'Directors’ or Compensation Committee'sCommittee’s determination of the degree of attainment of the performance goals or that the applicable "target"“target” levels of performance have been attained or on such other basis determined by the boardBoard of directorsDirectors or Compensation Committee.

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control Table for Fiscal Year 2017

2022

The information set forth in the table below for Mr. Pigott, Mr. Lemmerman and Mr. Denny is based on the assumption that the applicable triggering event under the Change in Control Executive Severance Plan or the applicable restricted stock award, stock option award or performance unit award agreement to which each named officerNEO was a party occurred on December 29, 2017,31, 2022, the last business day of fiscal year 2017.2022. Accordingly, for these NEOs the information reported in the table indicates the amount of cash severance and benefits that would be payable, and the value of restricted stock awards, stock option awards and performance unit awards that would vest or become exercisable, by reason of a termination under the circumstances described above, or upon a change in control, and is our best estimation of our obligations to each named executive officerNEO and will only be determinable with any certainty upon the occurrence of the applicable event. For purposes of determiningDr. Chandler, the value ofinformation set forth in the severance bonus, a full year prorated bonus for 2017 is included. For purposes of determining the value of the restricted stock awards, the fair market value per share of our common stock was $10.61 on December 29, 2017. For purposes of determining the value of the stock options, we utilized the Black-Scholes option pricing model at grant date. For purposes of determining the value of the 2017 and 2016 performance unit awards that are payable in stock, we assessed the total shareholder return through December 29, 2017 (without consideration of any potential impact such change of control event itself may have on such return) and determined that the performance was "below threshold" resulting in TSR Modifiers of 0.00%. For purposes of determining the value of the accelerated vesting of the 2015 performance unit awards that were payable in stock, we usedtable below reflects the actual TSR Modifier of 0.00% based on the Company finishingamount received in the 36th percentile of its Performance Group for TSR for the performance period of January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017. As their performance criteria were not satisfied, these awarded units lapsed and were not converted into common stock during the first quarter of 2018.


Table of Contents

connection with her involuntary departure.
Name
 Termination without
cause/for good
reason outside of a
change in control
 Change in control
(must be coupled with
Termination
without cause/for
good reason)(1)
 Change in
control only
 Termination
for cause
 Termination due
to death or
disability
 

Randy A. Foutch

                

Salary

 $ $2,544,000 $ $ $ 

Bonus

    4,240,000       

Accelerated Equity RS(2)

    2,511,366  2,511,366    2,511,366 

Accelerated Equity Options(2)

    4,091,798  4,091,798     

Accelerated Equity PS(2)(3)

           

Continued Medical

    20,905       

Total

 $ $13,408,069 $6,603,164 $ $2,511,366 

Richard C. Buterbaugh

                

Salary

 $ $980,000 $ $ $ 

Bonus

    1,323,000       

Accelerated Equity RS(2)

    1,109,986  1,109,986    1,109,986 

Accelerated Equity Options(2)

    1,809,524  1,809,524     

Accelerated Equity PS(2)(3)

           

Continued Medical

    20,905       

Total

 $ $5,243,415 $2,919,510 $ $1,109,986 

Daniel C. Schooley

                

Salary

 $ $800,000 $ $ $ 

Bonus

    1,020,000       

Accelerated Equity RS(2)

    765,076  765,076    765,076 

Accelerated Equity Options(2)

    997,816  997,816     

Accelerated Equity PS(2)(3)

           

Continued Medical

    27,448       

Total

 $ $3,610,340 $1,762,892 $ $765,076 

Patrick J. Curth

                

Salary

 $ $782,000 $ $ $ 

Bonus

    997,050       

Accelerated Equity RS(2)

    674,987  674,987    674,987 

Accelerated Equity Options(2)

    1,102,793  1,102,793     

Accelerated Equity PS(2)(3)

           

Continued Medical

    20,905       

Total

 $ $3,577,735 $1,777,780 $ $674,987 

Kenneth E. Dornblaser

                

Salary

 $ $730,000 $ $ $ 

Bonus

    930,750       

Accelerated Equity RS(2)

    836,652  836,652    836,652 

Accelerated Equity Options(2)

    1,018,945  1,018,945     

Accelerated Equity PS(2)(3)

           

Continued Medical

    20,905       

Total

 $ $3,537,252 $1,855,597 $ $836,652 


74Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
NameTermination without
cause/for good
reason outside of
a change in control
Change in control
(must be coupled
with Termination
without cause/for
good reason)
(1)
Change in
control only
Termination
for cause
Termination due
to death or
disability
Jason Pigott
Salary$— $2,325,000 $— $— $— 
Bonus— 2,906,250 — — — 
Accelerated Equity RS(2)
— 4,146,663 4,146,663 — 4,146,663 
Accelerated Equity PS(2)(3)
— 8,972,122 8,972,122 — 8,972,122 
Continued Medical— 39,818 — — — 
Total$— $18,389,853 $13,118,785 $— $13,118,785 
Bryan Lemmerman
Salary$— $950,000 $— $— $— 
Bonus— 855,000 — — — 
Accelerated Equity RS(2)
— 3,142,431 3,142,431 — 3,142,431 
Accelerated Equity PS(2)(3)
— 2,067,135 2,067,135 — 2,067,135 
Continued Medical— 26,781 — — — 
Total$— $7,041,347 $5,209,566 $— $5,209,566 
Mark Denny
Salary$— $750,000 $— $— $— 
Bonus— 637,500 — — — 
Accelerated Equity RS(2)
— 948,801 948,801 — 948,801 
Accelerated Equity PS(2)(3)
— 2,008,002 2,008,002 — 2,008,002 
Accelerated Equity Options(2)
— — — — — 
Continued Medical— 39,818 — — — 
Total$— $4,384,121 $2,956,803 $— $2,956,803 
Karen Chandler(4)
Total Severance$10,420,145 $— $— $— $— 
Continued Medical13,919 — — — — 
Total$10,434,064 $— $— $— $— 
(1)
Our Change in Control Executive Severance Plan, which was applicable to each of the named executive officers atNEOs effective December 31, 2017,2022, provides that in the event that during the 18-month period following a change in control the employment of a named executive officerNEO is terminated by the employer without cause or by the named executive officerNEO for good reason, then the named executive officerNEO is entitled to 200% (300% in the case of Mr. Foutch)Pigott) of such named executive officer'sNEO’s salary rate and 200% (300% in the case of Mr. Foutch)Pigott) of such named executive officer'sNEO’s STIP target bonus,cash award, plus a prorated bonusSTIP cash award in the year of termination, plus company paid COBRA continuation coverage for up to 18 months. In addition, the Equity Incentive Plan provides that in the event of a change in control, (i) with respect to restricted stock awards, the restricted period shall expire and restrictions applicable to outstanding restricted stock awards shall lapse and such awards shall become fully vested; (ii) with respect to stock option awards, all options will become fully vested and exercisable with respect to all shares of common stock covered thereby as of the date of the change ofin control; and (iii) with respect to performance units,unit awards, the "performance periods"“performance periods” in effect on the date the change ofin control occurs shall end on such date, and either the boardBoard of directorsDirectors or the Compensation Committee shall determine the extent to which the performance goals with respect to each such performance period have been met and shall then cause each holder of performance unit awards to receive partial, full or fullno issuance or cash payment, as applicable, of such awards for each performance period. The STIP cash bonus amounts for each named executive officerNEO do not include STIP bonuscash award earned in 2017 and paid in 2018.
2022. For purposes of determining the value of the restricted stock awards and performance unit awards, the fair market value per share of our common stock was $51.42 on December 31, 2022.

Table of Contents

(2)
At December 31, 2017,2022, the only forms of equityequity-based awards held by the named executive officersNEOs consisted of restricted stock awards, stock option awards and performance unit awards. Each such award may be impacted by the termination of the holder'sholder’s employment by the Company, depending on the reason for such termination, as follows: (i) the named executive officers'NEOs’ restricted stock awards provide that if the named executive officer'sNEO’s employment is terminated for any reason other than death or a determination of disability, but not later than the expiration of the option period, then the named executive officerNEO forfeits his or her unvested shares. Inshares; in the event of termination by death or disability, all unvested shares automatically vest; (ii) the stock option awards provide that the unvested portion of a stock option award shall expire upon termination of employment, and the vested portion of a stock option award shall remain exercisable for (a) one year following termination of employment by reason of the holder'sholder’s death or disability, but not later than the expiration of the option period, or (b) 90 days following termination of employment for any reason other than the holder'sholder’s death or disability, and other than the holder'sholder’s termination of employment for cause; provided both the unvested and the vested but unexercised portion of a stock option award shall expire upon the termination of the option holder'sholder’s employment or service by the Company for cause; and (iii) the performance unit awards provide that if the executive'sexecutive’s employment with the Company is terminated by the Company for any reason, with or without cause, or the executive resigns (in either case, other than by reason of death or disability) prior to the maturity date of the performance unit award, then no amount shall be paid in respect of the award. If, prior to the maturity date the executive'sexecutive’s employment is terminated with the Company either by reason of death or because the executive is determined by the boardBoard of directorsDirectors or the Compensation Committee to be subject to a disability, then the executive shall be eligible to receive a pro-rated performance unit award, taking into account the time that the executive was employed during the performance period prior to the date of such termination.



Executive Compensation Matters75
(3)
For the purposes of this table, the performance period was assumed to have ended on December 31, 20172022 for the 2017February 22, 2022 and 2016 share-settledMarch 9, 2021 performance unit awards and actually did end on December 31, 20172022 for the 2015 share-settledMarch 5, 2020 performance unit awards. At December 31, 20172022 (without consideration of any potential impact such change ofin control event may have), (i) the relative rankingsFebruary 22, 2022 performance unit awards had payout percentages of 0% for the PSU Matrix Component, 148% for the Net Debt/Consolidated EBITDAX Component, 0% for the Inventory Growth Component and 50% for the ESG Component, resulting in a Performance Multiple of 37%, (ii) the March 9, 2021 cash-settled performance unit awards had payout percentages of 125% for the PSU Matrix Component, 200% for the Net Debt/Consolidated EBITDAX Component and 200% for the Inventory Growth Component, resulting in a Performance Multiple of 163%, and (iii) the March 5, 2020 cash-settled performance unit awards had an RTSR Factor of 99%, an ATSR Factor of 200% and an ROACE Factor of 155%, resulting in a Performance Multiple of 151%.
(4)Of the total amount paid to Dr. Chandler, 86% was due to payment for previously granted restricted stock and performance units that were cancelled. The cancelled awards were valued at $76.85 per share, the Company’s price on August 23, 2022. Approximately 14% of the 2017, 2016total payment to Dr. Chandler was the cash severance payment amount prescribed under the Executive Severance Plan.
For information on our Change in Control Plan adopted in 2011, and 2015 share-settledour Severance Plan adopted in 2020, please see the Employee, Severance or Change In Control Agreements section.


76Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under the Equity Incentive Plan
At December 31, 2022, a total of 2,432,500 shares of common stock were authorized for issuance under the Equity Incentive Plan. In the table below, we describe certain information about these shares and the Equity Incentive Plan that provides for their authorization and issuance. You can find a description of the Equity Incentive Plan under "—Vital Energy, Inc. Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan."
Plan category
Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of outstanding
options or performance
units
(1)(2)
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
outstanding options and
performance units)
(1)(3)
Equity compensation plan approved by security holders(3)
51,865 $235.08 979,910 
Equity compensation plan not approved by security holders— $— — 
Total51,865  979,910 
(1)The formula for calculating the number of securities remaining available for future issuance includes the February 22, 2022 performance unit awards' total shareholder returns were 30.77%, 36.36%units at target level.
(2)This column includes 3,462 in outstanding options and 36.36%, respectively, all resulting48,403 in TSR Modifiers of 0.00%. outstanding performance units.
(3)See page 34Vital Energy, Inc. Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan in our Compensation Tables for discussion of these awards' TSR Modifier.more information.

CEO Pay Ratio

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, requires most companies with publicly traded stock inwe are providing the United States to identifyfollowing information about the medianrelationship of the annual total compensation of their worldwide employee population (other thanour employees and the chief executive officer) and to compare that amount with theannual total compensation of their chief executive officer. our CEO. We are utilizing a new median employee after utilizing the same median employee in the 2019, 2020 and 2021 Proxy Statements. We identified this new median employee using our employee population as of December 31, 2022. For 2022, our last completed fiscal year:
The median employee’s total annual compensation for 2022, in accordance with the requirements of the Summary Compensation Table, was $145,245; and
The annual total compensation of our CEO, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table, was $6,081,868.
Based on this information the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees in 2022 was calculated to be 42 to 1.
Methodology and Assumptions
Total compensation amounts are required to be calculated using the SEC's compensation disclosure rules applicable to reporting compensation in the summary compensation table of the proxy statement. Median employee compensation used to calculate the pay ratio is required to be the total compensation paid to an actual employee of the company. We identified oura new median employee in 2022 using our total employee population, excluding our Chief Executive Officer, (362 people) as of December 31, 20172022 by applying a consistently applied compensation measure across our employee population (all of whom are located in the United States), using the following factors:

Salary rate and wages paid during 2017;

2022
Overtime paid during 2017;

2022;
STIP paid in 2018 for 20172022 performance; and

Grant dateGrant-date fair value of all restricted stock awards, stock option awards and share-settled performance unit awards made during 2017.

2022.



Executive Compensation Matters77
We believe our consistently applied compensation measure represents the primary compensation components paid to all of our employees and therefore provides an accurate depiction of total earnings for the purpose of identifying our median employee. We then calculated the median employee's total annual compensation in accordance with the requirements of the summary compensation table. We did not use any material estimates, assumptions, adjustments or statistical sampling to determine the median employee.

        Based on the criteria used to calculate our Summary Compensation Table, our median employee's 2017 compensation was $138,449. Excluding our Chief Executive Officer, we had an even number of employees on December 31, 2017, resulting in a median calculation representing the average compensation between two employees. Therefore, in order to be conservative in calculating our ratio,


Table of Contents

we selected as our median employee the employee with the lower compensation

Pay Versus Performance
As required by Section 953(b) of the two. Our Chief Executive Officer'sDodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of executive “compensation actually paid”, or “CAP”, and certain financial performance of the Company. The following table shows, for the past three fiscal years, total 2017 compensation was $7,103,602 as reported in the summary compensation table on page 46. Accordingly,Summary Compensation Table for our 2017 CEO to median employee pay ratio was 51:1.

        Please keep in mind that under the SEC's rules and guidance, there are numerous ways to determine the compensation of a company's median employee, including the employee population sampled, the elements of pay and benefits used, any assumptions made and the use of statistical sampling. In addition, no two companiesaverage for our other NEOs, as compared to CAP and the Company’s financial performance. To determine CAP, we are required to make various adjustments to amounts that have identical employee populations or compensation programs, and pay, benefits and retirement plans differ by country even within the same company. As such, our pay ratio may not be comparable to the pay ratiobeen reported by other companies.

Compensation of Directors

        Based on a competitive review by FW Cook of outside director compensation paid by our peers, which also included consideration of the significant time commitment our board of directors provides to the Company, in 2017 the non-employee members of our board of directors were paid based on the compensation arrangements described below.

    Retainer—$90,000/year paid in stock awards or cash based on the election of the director; this award is payable ratably following each quarterly meeting of the board of directors. Prior to June 1, 2017, the retainer was $60,000/year.

    Committee Chairman Fees—

    Chairman of Audit Committee: $20,000/year paid in stock awards or cash based on the election of the director; this fee is payable ratably following each quarterly meeting of the board of directors. Prior to August 15, 2017, this fee was only paid in restricted stock awards and paid annually following the board meeting that accompanies our annual meeting of stockholders.

    Chairman of Compensation Committee: $20,000/year paid in stock awards or cash based on the election of the director; this fee is payable ratably following each quarterly meeting of the board of directors. Prior to June 1, 2017, this fee was $15,000 and prior to August 15, 2017, this fee was only paid in restricted stock awards and paid annually following the board meeting that accompanies our annual meeting of stockholders.

    Chairman of Other Committees: $15,000/year paid in stock awards or cash based on the election of the director; this fee is payable ratably following each quarterly meeting of the board of directors. Prior to June 1, 2017, this fee was $12,500 and prior to August 15, 2017, this fee was only paid in restricted stock awards and paid annually following the board meeting that accompanies our annual meeting of stockholders.

    Annual Director Fees—$160,000 paid in stock awards or in cash based on the election of the director; this fee is payable annually following the board meeting that accompanies our annual meeting of stockholders for all periods prior to May 17, 2018 and pro rata on a quarterly basis for all periods thereafter. Prior to August 15, 2017, this fee was only paid in restricted stock awards.

    Lead Independent Director Fee—$30,000/year paid in stock awards or cash based on the election of the director; this fee is payable ratably following each quarterly meeting of the board of directors. Prior to June 1, 2017, this fee was $20,000 and prior to August 15, 2017, this fee was only paid in restricted stock awards and paid annually following the board meeting that accompanies our annual meeting of stockholders.

    Entitled to receive up to 50% of their annual compensation in the formSummary Compensation Table, as the SEC’s rules for calculating CAP emphasize the changes in fair value of cash (in part to provideequity awards under applicable financial accounting standards (as further detailed in footnotes below).
Pay Versus Performance Table
Value of initial fixed $100 investment based on:
Year
Summary Compensation Table Total for CEO($)(1)
Compensation Actually Paid to CEO($)(1)(3)
Average Summary Compensation Table Total for other NEOs($)(2)
Average Compensation Actually Paid to other NEOs($)(2)(3)
Total Shareholder Return($)
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return($)(4)
Net Income
($ in ‘000s)
Free Cash Flow
($ in ‘000s)(5)
20226,081,868 4,599,210 6,190,682 2,704,360 89.58 154.88 613,512 219,941 
20215,933,849 17,125,786 2,650,349 6,798,965 104.76 106.29 145,008 (2,829)
20203,296,586 472,906 1,903,765 1,314,941 34.32 63.42 (874,173)12,056 
(1)Mr. Pigott was our CEO for each of 2022, 2021, and 2020.
(2)For 2022 and 2021, the cash needed to pay taxes on stock awards that vest), assuming their individual stock

Table of Contents

      ownership guidelines had been satisfied atother NEOs were Dr. Chandler and Messrs. Lemmerman and Denny. For 2020, the time of such election; this allows directors to potentially take a portion of their Annual Director Fees in the form of cash.

    A limitation on the number of shares of common stock that may be issued in respect of awards granted in a single calendar year of 1,435,000 shares.

    Participation in Charitable Matching Gift Program—Directors are permitted to participate in our charitable matching gift program. For more information, see "EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION—Compensation Discussionother NEOs were Dr. Chandler, Messrs. Lemmerman and Analysis—Other Benefits."

        Directors who are also employees of the Company will not receive any additional compensation for serving on our board of directors. Accordingly, see "—Summary Compensation" for the total compensation received by Randy A. Foutch. Beginning on August 15, 2017, stock awards to directors are not subject to a one-year vesting requirement.

Denny and Michael Beyer.

(3)The following table summarizes, with respect to our non-employee directors, information relating to the compensation earned for services rendered as directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.


Director compensation table for the year ended December 31, 2017

Name
 Stock
awards(1)(2)
 Fees earned
paid in cash(2)(3)
 Total 

Peter R. Kagan

 $242,478 $22 $242,500 

James R. Levy

 $242,478 $22 $242,500 

B.Z. (Bill) Parker

 $266,231 $19 $266,250 

Pamela S. Pierce

 $272,480 $20 $272,500 

Dr. Myles W. Scoggins

 $242,478 $22 $242,500 

Edmund P. Segner, III

 $212,489 $107,511 $320,000 

Donald D. Wolf

 $242,478 $22 $242,500 

(1)
Thedollar amounts reported represent the aggregate grant dateamount of CAP to the applicable NEO, as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid during the applicable year. The following adjustments were made to reconcile the Summary Compensation Table total each year to CAP:



78Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
YearExecutive(s)Summary Compensation Table Total($)Subtract Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in the Year($)Add Year-End Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Equity Awards Granted in the Year($)Add Year-over-Year Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years($)Add Change in Fair Value from Prior Year-End to Vesting Date for Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that Vested in the Year($)Subtract Fair Value as of Prior Year-End for Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that Failed to Meet Vesting Conditions in the Year($)Total Equity Award Adjustments($)Compensation Actually Paid($)
2022CEO6,081,868 (4,516,832)2,935,451 (1,818,367)1,917,090 — 3,034,174 4,599,210 
Other NEOs6,190,682 (2,079,730)912,345 (323,521)403,056 (2,398,472)(1,406,592)2,704,360 
2021CEO5,933,849 (4,008,399)7,450,088 6,782,647 967,601 — 15,200,336 17,125,786 
Other NEOs2,650,349 (1,644,878)3,057,202 2,153,301 582,991 — 5,793,494 6,798,965 
2020CEO3,296,586 (1,757,051)2,543,296 (3,002,166)(607,759)— (1,066,629)472,906 
Other NEOs1,903,765 (730,742)785,010 (409,762)(82,650)(150,680)141,918 1,314,941 
(4)Peer Group Total Shareholder Return represents the total shareholder return of the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index.
(5)Free Cash Flow is a non-GAAP measure; please see Annex A for descriptions of non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliations of GAAP to non-GAAP measures.
The fair value of equity awards includes (i) restricted stock awards, granted to Laredo's directors(ii) performance unit awards and (iii) de minimis amounts for services rendered for 2017,stock option awards. The measurement-date fair value of restricted stock awards was determined based on the closingmarket price of ourthe Company's common stock on the NYSE onapplicable measurement date (i.e., the grantvesting date in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

(2)
Fees earned duringor the fourth quarter of each year are paid during the first quarterlast day of the next year.

(3)
applicable fiscal year, as required by SEC rules). The amounts shown represent either theperformance unit awards include both a market-based component and a performance-based component. The measurement-date fair value of fractional shares paidthe market-based component was determined using a Monte Carlo fair value simulation model incorporating the assumptions below. The measurement-date fair value of the performance-based criteria was determined based upon the measurement-date stock price.
Grant Year20182019202020212022
Measurement Date12/31/201912/31/201912/31/202012/31/202012/31/202112/31/202112/31/202212/31/2022
Remaining Performance Period1.00 years2.00 years1.00 years2.00 years1.00 years2.00 years1.00 years2.00 years
Risk-free interest rate1.58 %1.57 %0.10 %0.13 %0.39 %0.73 %4.62 %4.31 %
Expected volatility63.11 %62.79 %170.98 %127.77 %86.17 %135.42 %79.77 %83.06 %
The measurement-date fair value assumptions outlined above are different from the assumptions utilized in cashdetermining the grant-date fair value. The assumptions utilized in estimating the grant-date fair value of the market-based component of the performance unit awards are outlined below.
Grant Date2/16/20182/28/20196/3/20193/5/20203/15/20212/22/2022
Remaining performance period on grant date2.87 years2.63 years2.58 years2.82 years2.81 years2.86 years
Risk-free interest rate2.34 %2.14 %1.27 %0.60 %0.32 %1.71 %
Expected volatility65.49 %55.01 %55.45 %60.41 %114.60 %119.25 %
Narrative to those directors electingPay Versus Performance Table
This section should be read in conjunction with the CD&A on page 43, which includes additional discussion of our objectives of executive compensation and benefits program and how they are aligned with the company’s financial and operational performance. The Compensation Committee does not use CAP as a basis for making compensation decisions, nor do we use the performance measure of Net Income, as defined by the SEC for purposes of the Pay Versus Performance Table above, to take stock awards in lieumeasure performance for compensation.
The charts below show, for the past three years, the relationship of cash, or inTotal Shareholder Return relative to our Peer Group Total Shareholder Return as well as the case of Mr. Segner, his elections to receive the following applicable cash payments with respect to each quarterly meeting:relationships between CEO and Average Other NEO CAP and (i) Retainer,Total Shareholder Return; (ii) Chairman of Audit Committee FeeNet Income; and (iii) Lead Independent Director Fee.

Table of Contents

        The following table summarizes, with respect to our non-employee directors, information relating to the outstanding unvested restricted stock awards as of December 31, 2017 earned by each director for services rendered. Stock awards granted on or after August 15, 2017 vest immediately and restricted stock awards granted prior to this have a one-year cliff vest.

Free Cash Flow.


Executive Compensation Matters79
lpi-20230405_g75.jpg

lpi-20230405_g76.jpg


80Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
lpi-20230405_g77.jpg

Name
Grant dateRestricted
stock awards
not vested

Peter R. Kagan

5/10/201714,147

2022 Performance Measures
2/13/20171,063Most Important Performance Measures

James R. Levy

We consider the performance measures listed in the table to the right as the most important performance measures used by us to link NEO compensation for 2022 to Company performance. Each of these measures is described in more detail in the CD&A under the section “2022 Compensation Alignment & Pay for Performance.”
5/10/201714,147Free Cash Flow

2/13/20171,063Absolute Total Shareholder Return

B.Z. (Bill) Parker

5/10/201715,157Net Debt/Consolidated EBITDAX

2/13/20171,063Inventory Growth

Pamela S. Pierce

5/10/201715,359

2/13/20171,063

Dr. Myles W. Scoggins

5/10/201714,147

2/13/20171,063

Edmund P. Segner, III

5/10/201716,168

Donald D. Wolf

5/10/201714,147

2/13/20171,063Environmental/Safety

        Our independent directors are reimbursed for their expenses to attend board meetings.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under the Equity Incentive Plan

        At December 31, 2017, a total of 24,350,000 shares of common stock were authorized for issuance under the Equity Incentive Plan. In the table below, we describe certain information about these shares and the Equity Incentive Plan that provides for their authorization and issuance. You can find a description of the Equity Incentive Plan under "—Laredo Petroleum, Inc. Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan."


Plan category
 Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options
 Weighted-average exercise
price of outstanding options
 Number of securities remaining
available for future issuance
under equity compensation
plans (excluding outstanding
options)(1)(2)
 

Equity compensation plan approved by security holders(1)

  2,646,996 $12.70  12,863,773 

Equity compensation plan not approved by security holders

       

Total

  2,646,996     12,863,773 

(1)
See "—Laredo Petroleum, Inc. 2011 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan" for more information.

(2)
The share-settled performance unit awards granted on February 27, 2015 had a performance period of January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017 and, as their performance criteria were not satisfied, resulting in a TSR Modifier of 0% based on the Company finishing in the 36th percentile of its peer group for relative TSR, the granted units lapsed and were not converted into common stock during the first quarter of 2018. The formula for calculating the number of securities remaining available for future issuance excludes these 2015 performance unit awards and also assumes the May 25, 2016 and February 17, 2017 share-settled performance units outstanding

Table of Contents

    result in a maximum performance period level, resulting in a TSR Modifier of 200%, even though the actual performance period through December 31, 2018 for the May 25, 2016 share-settled performance unit awards, and through December 31, 2019 for the February 17, 2017 share-settled performance unit awards, are not complete. If the May 25, 2016 and February 17, 2017 share-settled performance unit awards were included at a TSR Modifier of 100%, the number of securities remaining available for issuance under the Equity Incentive Plan (excluding outstanding options), as of December 31, 2017 would be 15,155,028. See page 34 for discussion of these awards' TSR Modifier.


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

        No member of the Compensation Committee has been at any time an employee of Laredo. None of the Company's executive officers serve on the board of directors or compensation committee of a company that has an executive officer that serves on the Company's board of directors or Compensation Committee. No member of the Company's board of directors is an executive officer of a company in which one of the Company's executive officers serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of that company.


Table of Contents


AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

        The Company has determined that: (i) Messrs. Segner, Parker and Wolf, Dr. Scoggins and Ms. Pierce are independent, as defined in Section 10A of the Exchange Act and under the standards set forth by the NYSE; and (ii) all current Audit Committee members are financially literate. In addition, Messrs. Segner and Wolf, Dr. Scoggins and Ms. Pierce qualify as an audit committee financial expert under the applicable rules promulgated pursuant to the Exchange Act.

        During the last fiscal year, and earlier this year in preparation for the filing with the SEC of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, the Audit Committee:

    reviewed and discussed the Company's audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017 with management and with the independent registered public accountants;

    considered the adequacy of the Company's internal controls and the quality of its financial reporting, and discussed these matters with management and with the independent registered public accountants;

    reviewed and discussed with the independent registered public accountants (i) their judgments as to the quality of the Company's accounting policies, (ii) the written disclosures and letter from the independent registered public accountants required by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Independence Rules, and the independent registered public accountants' independence, and (iii) the matters required to be discussed by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board's Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees;

    discussed with management and with the independent registered public accountants the process by which the Company's Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer make the certifications required by the SEC in connection with the filing with the SEC of the Company's periodic reports, including reports on Forms 10-K and 10-Q;

    pre-approved all auditing services and non-audit services to be performed for the Company by the independent registered public accountants as required by the applicable rules promulgated pursuant to the Exchange Act, considered whether the rendering of non-audit services was compatible with maintaining Grant Thornton LLP's independence, and concluded that Grant Thornton LLP's independence was not compromised by the provision of such services (details regarding the fees paid to Grant Thornton LLP in fiscal year 2017 for audit services, tax services and all other services, are set forth in "Audit and Other Fees" below); and

    based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, recommended to the board of directors that the audited consolidated financial statements referred to above be included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

        As recommended by the NYSE's corporate governance rules, the Audit Committee also considered whether, to assure continuing auditor independence, it would be advisable to regularly rotate the audit firm itself. The Audit Committee has concluded that the current benefits to the Company from continued retention of Grant Thornton LLP warrant retaining the firm at this time. The Audit Committee will, however, continue to review this issue on an annual basis.

        Notwithstanding the foregoing actions and the responsibilities set forth in the Audit Committee Charter, it is not the duty of the Audit Committee to plan or conduct audits or to determine that the Company's consolidated financial statements are complete and accurate and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Management is responsible for the Company's financial reporting process, including its system of internal controls, and for the preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The independent registered public accountants are responsible for expressing an opinion on those


Table of Contents

financial statements. Audit Committee members are not employees of the Company or accountants or auditors by profession. Therefore, the Audit Committee has relied, without independent verification, on management's representation that the consolidated financial statements have been prepared with integrity and objectivity and in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and on the representations of the independent registered public accountants included in their report on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

        The Audit Committee meets regularly with management and the independent auditors, including private discussions with the independent registered public accountants, and receives the communications described above. The Audit Committee has also established procedures for (i) the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and (ii) the confidential, anonymous submission by the Company's employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. However, this oversight does not provide us with an independent basis to determine that management has maintained appropriate accounting and financial reporting principles or policies, or appropriate internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. Furthermore, our considerations and discussions with management and the independent registered public accountants do not assure that the Company's consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles or that the audit of the Company's consolidated financial statements has been carried out in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.

Audit Committee of the Board of Directors



Edmund P. Segner, III, Chair
B.Z. (Bill) Parker, Member
Donald D. Wolf, Member
Dr. Myles W. Scoggins, Member
Pamela S. Pierce, Member
81

The information contained in this Audit Committee Report

Stock Ownership Information
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and references in this Proxy Statement to the independence of the Audit Committee members shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or to be "filed" with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates such information by reference in such filing.

Management

Table of Contents


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Guidelines

        The board of directors believes that its fundamental responsibility is to promote the best interests of the Company and its stockholders by overseeing the management of the Company's business and affairs. Directors must exercise their business judgment and act in what they reasonably believe to be the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. The board of directors is elected by the stockholders to oversee management and to ensure that the long-term interests of the stockholders are being served. Directors must fulfill their responsibilities consistent with their fiduciary duties to the stockholders and in compliance with applicable laws and regulations.

        The board of directors believes that sound governance practices and policies provide an important framework to assist it in fulfilling its duty to the Company's stockholders. The Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines cover the following principal subjects:

    Board of Directors Composition and Selection; Director Qualifications

    Board of directors size

    Selection of members of the board of directors

    Determination of independence of directors

    Selection of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

    Term limits

    Retirement

    Other directorships

    Change in status of directors

    Committees of the board of directors

    Board of Directors Meetings; Director Responsibilities

    Board of directors meetings and agenda

    Access to management and advisers

    Executive sessions

    Director orientation and education

    Annual performance evaluations

    Succession planning

    Director compensation

    Stock ownership guidelines

    Shareholder communications with the board of directors

    Board of directors communications with third parties

        In recent years, the subjects of board composition and selection criteria have been given greater scrutiny by investors in general. We believe that in attempting to fill any available board position the guiding principle must be to find a fully qualified candidate that will act as a positive influence in overseeing the interests of the Company and its stockholders. The concept of "fully qualified" must also consider a complete array of criteria, including, but not limited to, diversity. Diversity itself can


Table of Contents

take many forms, including in the form of gender, race, age, ethnicity, geographic exposure and otherwise. Our board is committed to the belief that a diverse board will help ensure that its decision-making capabilities as an entirety will lead to more thoughtful processing. Our current seven independent board members range in age from 42 to 74, with one female member. Our board also provides relative broad geographic diversity, with members residing in New York, Denver and Houston and points in between. Our current board lacks diversity in terms of race and ethnicity, and depending on "guidelines" established by various investor groups, should have more gender diversity.

        Our board recognizes these current traits, as well as the fact that several directors are in their 70's. As the opportunity arises, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will be tasked with seeking new board members, and is committed to search for those fully qualified individuals who may also bring with them additional elements of diversity to strengthen the overall acumen and decision-making capabilities of the board as a whole.

        The "Corporate Governance Guidelines" are posted on our website at www.laredopetro.com. The Corporate Governance Guidelines are being reviewed annually by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and any proposed additions to or amendments of the Corporate Governance Guidelines will be presented to the board of directors for its approval.

        The NYSE has adopted rules that require listed companies to adopt governance guidelines covering certain matters. The Company believes that the Corporate Governance Guidelines comply with the NYSE rules.

Code of Conduct and Business Ethics

        The board of directors has adopted a Code of Conduct and Business Ethics applicable to our employees, directors and officers and a Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, in accordance with applicable U.S. federal securities laws and the corporate governance rules of the NYSE. Any waiver of these codes may be made only by our board of directors and will be promptly disclosed as required by applicable U.S. federal securities laws and the corporate governance rules of the NYSE. A copy of the Code of Conduct and Business Ethics and Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers is available on our website at www.laredopetro.com.

Board of Directors Leadership

        Mr. Foutch is Laredo's founder and has served as Laredo's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since its inception. He also served as Laredo's President from October 2006 to July 2008.

        The board of directors believes the combined role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer promotes unified leadership and direction for the Company, which allows for a single, clear focus for management to execute the Company's strategy and business plans. As Chief Executive Officer, the Chairman is best suited to ensure that critical business issues are brought before the board of directors, which enhances the board of director's ability to develop and implement business strategies.

        To ensure a strong and independent board of directors, as discussed herein, the board of directors has affirmatively determined that all directors of the Company, other than Mr. Foutch, are independent within the meaning of the NYSE listing standards currently in effect. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that non-management directors shall meet in regular executive session without management present, and that the Chairman of the Audit Committee, Mr. Segner who serves as our lead independent director, shall act as the Chairman of such meetings. Additionally, Mr. Segner actively participates in establishing and setting board meeting agendas.


Table of Contents

Communications with the Board of Directors

        Stockholders or other interested parties can contact any director, any committee of the board of directors, or the Company's non-management directors as a group, by writing to them at Laredo Petroleum, Inc., c/o Corporate Secretary, 15 W. Sixth Street, Suite 900, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119. Comments or complaints relating to the Company's accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters will also be referred to members of the Audit Committee. All such communications will be forwarded to the appropriate member(s) of the board of directors.

Director Independence

        The board of directors annually reviews and determines the independence of each director. In making its determination, the board of directors carefully considers all facts and circumstances it deems relevant to the determination. Members of the board of directors have an affirmative obligation to promptly inform the Company's General Counsel of changes in their circumstances or any transactions or relationships that may impact their designation by the board of directors as "independent."

        The board of directors has assessed the independence of each non-employee director under the Company's guidelines and the independence standards of the NYSE. The board of directors affirmatively determined that all seven of the non-employee directors (Messrs. Kagan, Levy, Parker, Segner and Wolf, Dr. Scoggins and Ms. Pierce) are independent under the Company's guidelines and independence standards of the NYSE. This determination included specifically consideration of Warburg Pincus' stock ownership in the Company and Messrs. Kagan's and Levy's relationship with Warburg Pincus. Under the standards of the NYSE, the concern is "independence from management" and, therefore, the ownership of even a significant amount of stock is not, by itself, a bar to an independence finding.

        In connection with its assessment of the independence of each non-employee director, the board of directors also determined that Messrs. Segner, Parker and Wolf, Dr. Scoggins and Ms. Pierce meet the additional independence standards of the NYSE and SEC applicable to members of the Audit Committee. Those standards require that the director not be an affiliate of the Company and that the director not receive from the Company, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fees except for fees for services as a director.

Executive Sessions of the Board of Directors

        Our independent directors meet regularly in executive session without management to review the performance of management and our Company and any related matters. The Chairman of our Audit Committee, Mr. Segner, serves as the Chair and lead independent director of such meetings. Generally, executive sessions are held in conjunction with regularly scheduled meetings of our board of directors. We expect our board of directors to have at least four executive sessions each year.

Financial Literacy of Audit Committee and Designation of Financial Experts

        As a part of its annual self-assessment process, the board of directors evaluated each of the members of the Audit Committee for financial literacy and the attributes of a financial expert during its November 2017 meeting. The board of directors determined that each of the Audit Committee members is financially literate and each of Messrs. Segner and Wolf, Dr. Scoggins and Ms. Pierce qualifies as a financial expert as defined by the SEC.

Oversight of Risk Management

        The board of directors oversees an enterprise-wide approach to risk management, designed to support the achievement of the Company's objectives and to maintain stockholder value. The Audit


Table of Contents

Committee is primarily responsible for overseeing the Company's exposure to financial risk and reviewing the steps the Company's management has taken to monitor and control such exposure. The Audit Committee meets at least four times per year, in addition to periodic meetings with management and internal and independent auditors to accomplish its purpose. Additionally, each of the committees of the board of directors considers the risks within its area of responsibilities. We believe that the leadership structure of our board of directors supports its effective oversight of the Company's risk management.

Attendance at Annual Meetings

        The board of directors encourages all directors to attend the annual meetings of stockholders, if practicable. All of our incumbent directors attended our last annual meeting. We anticipate that all of our directors will attend the Annual Meeting.


Table of Contents

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of outstanding common stock by

(i)beneficial owners of more than five percent of the Company’s outstanding common stock as of March 20, 201828, 2023, of which is determined using the aggregate amount beneficially owned by (i) beneficial owners of five percenteach reporting person reported in a Schedule 13D or moreSchedule 13G filing with the SEC as of the Company's common stock, date of event which requires filing of such statement,
(ii)each director of the Company as of March 28, 2023,
(iii)each named executive officerNEO of the Company as of March 28, 2023 and
(iv)all of the Company'sCompany’s directors and executive officers as a group. group as of March 28, 2023.
Unless otherwise noted, the mailing address of each person or entity named below is c/o Laredo Petroleum, Inc., 15 W. Sixth Street, Suite 900, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119. is:
c/o Vital Energy, Inc.
Santa Fe Plaza
521 E. 2
nd Street
Suite 1000
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74120


82Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with SEC rules. Shares not outstanding but deemed beneficially owned by virtue of the right of a person to acquire shares within 60 days of March 20, 2018,28, 2023, are included as outstanding and beneficially owned for that person but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Except as noted in the footnotes below, the holders have sole voting and dispositive powers over the shares.

Name of person or identity of group
 Number of
shares
 Percentage of
class(1)
 

Warburg Pincus Private Equity IX, L.P.(2)

  36,215,078  15.0%

Warburg Pincus Private Equity X O&G, L.P.(2)

  40,163,657  16.7%

Warburg Pincus X Partners, L.P.(2)

  1,291,411  * 

SailingStone Capital Partners LLC(3)

  39,629,061  16.4%

SPO Advisory Corp.(4)

  21,209,105  8.8%

Vanguard Group Inc.(5)

  15,454,180  6.4%

Randy A. Foutch(6)(7)(8)

  2,725,104  1.1%

Peter R. Kagan(2)(9)

  77,758,934  32.2%

James R. Levy(2)(9)

  77,784,190  32.3%

B.Z. (Bill) Parker

  155,152  * 

Pamela S. Pierce

  163,941  * 

Dr. Myles W. Scoggins(10)

  89,826  * 

Edmund P. Segner, III

  75,340  * 

Donald D. Wolf(11)

  100,693  * 

Richard C. Buterbaugh(6)

  661,758  * 

Daniel C. Schooley(6)

  415,598  * 

Patrick J. Curth(6)

  300,591  * 

Kenneth E. Dornblaser(6)

  373,032  * 

Directors and executive officers as a group (13 persons)(12)

  5,423,059  2.2%

Name of person or identity of groupNumber of shares
Percentage
of class(1)
BlackRock, Inc.(2)
2,677,720 15.7 %
State Street Corporation(3)
2,443,942 14.4 %
The Vanguard Group(4)
1,152,140 6.8 %
William E. Albrecht(5)
15,593 *
John Driver(5)
1,521 *
Mark Denny(6)
25,832 *
Frances Powell Hawes(5)
16,599 *
Jarvis V. Hollingsworth(5)
5,214 *
Dr. Craig M. Jarchow(5)
11,426 *
Dr. Shihab A. Kuran(5)
1,521 *
Lisa M. Lambert6,902 *
Lori A. Lancaster(5)
4,711 *
Bryan Lemmerman75,232 *
Jason Pigott121,775 *
Edmund P. Segner, III(5)
19,447 *
Directors and executive officers as a group (12 persons)305,773 1.8 %
*
Denotes less than 1% beneficially owned.

(1)
Based upon an aggregate of 241,159,07317,025,123 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 20, 2018.

28, 2023.
(2)
This share ownership information was provided in a Schedule 13D Amendment No. 213G/A filed on February 27, 2017January 26, 2023 by Warburg Pincus Private Equity IX, L.P. The stockholders are (i) Warburg Pincus Private Equity IX, L.P.BlackRock, Inc., a Delaware limited partnership ("WP IX"), including an affiliated partnership, (ii) Warburg Pincus Private Equity X O&G, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("WP X O&G"),which disclosed that of the reported shares, such entity possesses sole voting and (iii) Warburg Pincus X Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("WP X Partners"). Warburg Pincus IX GP L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("WP IX GP"), is the general partnerdispositive power of WP IX. Warburg Pincus X, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("WP X GP"), is the general partner of each of WP X O&G2,660,413 shares and WP X Partners. Warburg Pincus X GP L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("WP X LP"), is the general partner of WP X GP. WPP GP LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("WPP GP"), is the general partner of WP IX GP and WP X LP. Warburg Pincus Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("WP Partners"), is the managing member of WPP GP. Warburg Pincus Partners GP LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("WP Partners GP"), is the general partner of WP Partners. Warburg Pincus & Co., a

Table of Contents

    New York general partnership ("WP"), is the managing member of WP Partners GP. Warburg Pincus LLC, a New York limited liability company ("WP LLC"), manages each of WP IX, WP X O&G and WP X Partners. Charles R. Kaye and Joseph P. Landy are each Managing General Partners of WP and Managing Members and Co-Chief Executive Officers of WP LLC and may be deemed to control the Warburg Pincus entities. Messrs. Kaye and Landy disclaim beneficial ownership of all2,677,720 shares, held by the Warburg Pincus entities.respectively. The address of the Warburg Pincus entitiesBlackRock, Inc. is 450 Lexington Avenue,55 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10017.

10055.
(3)
This share ownership information was provided in a Schedule 13G Amendment No. 513G/A filed on February 6, 201813, 2023 by SailingStone Capital Partners LLC, which disclosed that such entity possesses sole voting and dispositive power of the reported shares. The address of SailingStone Capital Partners LLC is One CaliforniaState Street 30th Floor, San Francisco, California 94111.

(4)
This share ownership information was provided in a Schedule 13G Amendment No. 3 filed on February 14, 2018 by SPO Advisory Corp., which disclosed that such entity possesses sole voting and dispositive power of the reported shares. The address of SPO Advisory Corp. is 591 Redwood Highway, Suite 3215, Mill Valley, California 94941.

(5)
This share ownership information was provided in a Schedule 13G Amendment No. 1 filed on February 9, 2018 by Vanguard Group Inc.,Corporation, which disclosed that of the reported shares, such entity possesses shared voting and dispositive power of 17,7432,434,022 shares and 89,2802,443,942 shares, respectively, and solerespectively. The address of State Street Corporation is 1 Lincoln Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02111.
(4)This share ownership information was provided in a Schedule 13G/A filed on February 9, 2023 by The Vanguard Group, which disclosed that of the reported shares, such entity possesses shared voting and dispositive power of 83,58439,411 shares and 15,364,90052,170 shares, respectively.respectively, and sole dispositive power of 1,099,970 shares. The address of The Vanguard Group Inc. is 100 Vanguard Boulevard, Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355.

(5)Includes deferred stock compensation received pursuant to the Director Deferred Compensation Plan.
(6)
Includes aggregated vested and exercisable stock options of 598,556, 223,116, 115,968, 77,027 and 141,9431,842 for Messrs. Foutch, Buterbaugh, Schooley, Curth and Dornblaser, respectively,Mr. Denny within 60 days of March 20, 2018.

(7)
Randy A. Foutch,28, 2023.



Stock Ownership Information83

Proposal Four
Approval of an Amendment and Restatement of the Certificate of Incorporation to Clarify and Eliminate Obsolete Provisions
The Board voted to approve, and to recommend to our stockholders that they approve, an amendment and restatement of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (as amended to date, the “Certificate of Incorporation”) to make certain technical and administrative changes to clarify the Certificate of Incorporation and remove obsolete language relating to the prior equity ownership of Warburg Pincus, LLC (including its affiliates, “Warburg Pincus”), as described below. The changes to the Certificate of Incorporation, as discussed in more detail below, do not impact the rights of our stockholders in any substantive manner. A form of the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Restated Certificate of Incorporation”), which reflects the proposed amendments contemplated by this Proposal 4, is attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex B.
Background
Name Change
Effective January 9, 2023, the Company changed its corporate name from Laredo Petroleum, Inc. to Vital Energy, Inc., pursuant to a Certificate of Amendment to its Certificate of Incorporation filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on January 6, 2023. The Company also amended and restated its bylaws to reflect the name change, effective as of January 9, 2023 (as amended and restated, the “Bylaws”). The proposed amendments would amend and restate the Certificate of Incorporation consistent with the name change amendment that became effective as of January 9, 2023.
Amendment to Authorized Capital Stock
At the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, upon the recommendation of the Board, the Company’s stockholders approved an amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), from 22,500,000 shares to 40,000,000 shares.
The amendment became effective upon the filing of a Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation with the Delaware Secretary of State on May 26, 2022. The proposed amendments would amend and restate the Certificate of Incorporation consistent with the amendment to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock that became effective as of May 26, 2022.
Removal of Obsolete Provisions Relating to Prior Equity Ownership of Affiliates of Warburg Pincus
Currently, the Certificate of Incorporation includes certain provisions that were applicable until the time that Warburg Pincus no longer beneficially owned more than fifty percent of our outstanding Common Stock. We believe that Warburg Pincus currently owns less than five percent of our Common Stock. The proposed amendments would delete certain obsolete provisions relating to the prior equity ownership of Warburg Pincus, which includes language in Articles Sixth (director terms, board classification, removal of directors), Ninth (ability for stockholders to take action by written consent), Tenth (amendments) and Eleventh (corporate opportunities), as described in more detail below.


84Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
Proposed Amendments
If our stockholders approve this Proposal 4, the Company intends to amend and restate the Certificate of Incorporation to reflect each of the prior amendments and to remove obsolete language relating to prior equity ownership of affiliates of Warburg Pincus. The changes to the Certificate of Incorporation do not impact the rights of our stockholders in any substantive manner. Below is a summary of the changes to the Certificate of Incorporation proposed pursuant to this Proposal 4:
Article First: Amending the name of the Company to give effect to the Certificate of Amendment effective as of January 9, 2023.
Article Fourth, Paragraph A.: Amending Paragraph A to give effect to the Certificate of Amendment effective on May 26, 2022, increasing the authorized Common Stock to 40,000,000 shares and correspondingly increasing the number of authorized shares of our capital stock to 90,000,000.
Article Sixth, Paragraphs B., E. and G.: Removing obsolete language pertaining to Warburg Pincus and its affiliates owning more than fifty percent (50%) of outstanding Common Stock as it relates to director terms, classification of the Board and director removal.
Article Ninth: Removing obsolete language pertaining to Warburg Pincus and its affiliates owning more than fifty percent (50%) of outstanding Common Stock as it relates to stockholders’ ability to take action by written consent.
Article Tenth: Removing language requiring the affirmative vote of the holders of at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the voting power of all of the then-outstanding shares of the capital stock of the Company entitled to vote thereon to amend Article Eleventh.
Article Eleventh: Removing obsolete corporate opportunity provisions renouncing any interest or expectancy in any business opportunity, transaction or other matter in which Warburg Pincus participates or desires or seeks to participate in and that involves any aspect of the energy business or industry.
We believe the adoption of this Proposal 4 would simplify and clarify our governing documents, and eliminate provisions that are no longer applicable. A form of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation, which reflects the proposed amendments contemplated by this Proposal 4, is attached to this Proxy Statement as Annex B. If adopted, the Restated Certificate of Incorporation will become effective immediately following our filing of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of the State of Delaware after the conclusion of this Annual Meeting.
Approval of the proposed amendment and restatement of our Certificate of Incorporation requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the voting power of all of the then-outstanding shares of the capital stock of the Company entitled to vote thereon, voting together as a single class. Abstentions with respect to this proposal will have the effect of a vote against this proposal. This proposal is considered to be “routine” under the NYSE rules. As a result, brokers will have discretionary authority to vote on this proposal and there will be no broker non-votes with respect to this proposal. Properly executed proxies will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions specified on the proxy.
lpi-20230405_g50.jpg
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote FOR an approval of an amendment and restatement of the Certificate of Incorporation to clarify and eliminate obsolete provisions.


85
Proxy Statement Questions & Answers
2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
The Board of Directors requests your proxy for the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chairman2023 Annual Meeting of the board of directors, is a limited partner of certain affiliates of Warburg Pincus.

(8)
Includes (i) 451,340 shares held by Lariat Ranch, an entity of which Mr. Foutch owns approximately 80% and has shared voting power, (ii) 360,148 shares held equally among four family trusts and (iii) 500 shares held by Mr. Foutch's daughter.

(9)
Peter R. Kagan and James R. Levy, directors of the Company, are Partners of WP and Members and Managing Directors of WP LLC. 77,670,146 of the shares indicated as owned by Messrs. Kagan and Levy are included because of their affiliation with the Warburg Pincus entities. Messrs. Kagan and Levy disclaim beneficial ownership of all shares held by the Warburg Pincus entities.

(10)
Includes 5,000 shares held in a joint account for which Dr. Scoggins shares voting and dispositive powers with his spouse.

(11)
Includes 3,000 shares held by the Donald D. Wolf 2007 Irrevocable Trust.

(12)
Does not include shares of common stock held by WP IX, WP X O&G and WP X Partners (as defined in footnote 2) in which Messrs. Kagan and Levy may be deemed to have an indirect pecuniary interest (within the meaning of Rule 16a-1 under the Exchange Act).

Table of Contents


SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

        The executive officers and directors of the Company and persons who own more than 10% of the Company's common stock are required to file reports with the SEC, disclosing the amount and nature of their beneficial ownership in common stock, as well as changes inStockholders that ownership. Based solely on our review of reports and written representations that the Company has received, the Company believes that all required reports were timely filed during 2017 with the following exception: restricted stock held by Michael Beyer vested on April 7, 2017 and in connection with such vesting, 538 shares were withheld to cover payment of income taxes attributable to the vested shares. A Form 4 reporting the "disposition" of such withheld shares was filed on April 12, 2017.


TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

Procedures for Review, Approval and Ratification of Related-Person Transactions

        A "Related-Party Transaction" is a transaction, arrangement or relationship in which the Company or any of its subsidiaries was, is or will be a participant,held:

Date & TimePlace
Thursday, May 25, 2023
at 9:00 a.m. Central Daylight Time
Santa Fe Plaza Building
521 E. 2ndStreet
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74120
By granting the amount of which involved exceeds $120,000, and in which any related person had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. A "Related Person" means:

    any person who is, or at any time duringproxy, you authorize the applicable period was, one of the Company's executive officers or one of its directors;

    any person who is known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5.0% of the Company's common stock;

    any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons which means any child, stepchild, parent, stepparent, spouse, sibling, mother-in-law, father-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law or sister-in-law of a director, executive officer or a beneficial owner of more than 5.0% of the Company's common stock; and

    any entity in which any of the foregoing persons (i) has direct or indirect control, (ii) is a partner or principal or in a similar position, (iii) has a 10.0% or greater beneficial ownership interest or (iv) is employed if (a) the person is directly involved in the negotiation of the Related-Party Transaction or will share or have primary responsibility for such transaction or (b) the person's compensation from the entity is directly tied to such transaction.

        The board of directors has determined that the Audit Committee is best suited to review and approve Related-Party Transactions, although the board of directors may instead determine that a particular Related-Party Transaction should be reviewed and approved by a majority of disinterested directors. No member of the Audit Committee shall participate in the review or approval of any Related-Party Transaction with respect to which such member is a Related Person. In reviewing and approving any Related-Party Transaction, the Audit Committee shall:

    Satisfy itself that it has been fully informed as to the material facts of the Related Person's relationship and interest and as to the material facts of the proposed Related-Party Transaction;

    Take into account the extent of the Related Person's interest in the Related-Party Transaction; and

    Determine that the Related-Party Transaction is fair to the Company and that the Related-Party Transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances.

        At each Audit Committee meeting, management shall recommend any Related-Party Transactions, if applicable, to be entered into by the Company. After review, the Audit Committee shall approve or disapprove such transactions and at each subsequently scheduled meeting, management shall update the


Table of Contents

Audit Committee as to any material change to those proposed transactions. The Audit Committee shall establish such guidelines as it determines are necessary or appropriate for management to follow in its dealings with Related Persons in Related-Party Transactions.

        Each director is required to affirmatively disclose any changes in his or her related party status in accordance with a standing agenda item at each committee meeting and each meeting of the board of directors. If management becomes aware of a proposed Related-Party Transaction or an existing Related-Party Transaction that has not been pre-approved by the Audit Committee, management shall promptly notify the Chairman of the Audit Committee and such transactions shall be submitted to the Audit Committee for their review, consideration and determination of whether to approve or ratify, as applicable, such transaction if the Audit Committee determines it is fair to the Company. If management, in consultation with the Company's Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer, determines that it is not practicable to wait until the next Audit Committee meeting, the Chairman of the Audit Committee has the delegated authority during the period between Audit Committee meetings, to review, consider and determine whether any such transaction is fair to the Company and whether the transaction should be approved, or ratified, as the case may be. The Chairman of the Audit Committee shall report to the Audit Committee any transactions reviewed by him pursuant to this delegated authority at the next Audit Committee meeting.

        Additional information relating to the Company's policies regarding Related-Party Transactions is set forth in the "Policy Statement Regarding Related-Party Transactions" that is postednamed on the Company's website at www.laredopetro.com.

Registration Rights

        On December 20, 2011, in connection with the closing of its initial public offering, the Company entered into a registration rights agreement (the "Registration Rights Agreement") with affiliates of Warburg Pincusproxy to represent you and the other former unitholders of Laredo LLC. Under the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement, Warburg Pincus is the only remaining holder of registration rights under the Registration Rights Agreement. The Registration Rights Agreement requires the Company to file, within 30 days of receipt of a demand notice issued by Warburg Pincus, a registration statement with the SEC permitting the public offering of registrable securities. In addition, the Registration Rights Agreement grants Warburg Pincus the right to join the Company, or "piggyback", in certain circumstances, if the Company is selling its common stock in an offering at any time after its initial public offering. The Registration Rights Agreement also includes customary provisions dealing with indemnification, contribution and allocation of expenses.

Other Related-Party Transactions

        On January 1, 2013, pursuant to a revised aircraft use policy adopted by our board of directors, we entered into a Non-Exclusive Aircraft Lease Agreement (as amended, the "Aircraft Lease") with Lariat Ranch, the aircraft owner and an entity controlled by Mr. Foutch, for a term of one year, automatically renewable for subsequent one-year terms subject to the parties' termination rights. The Aircraft Lease was amended effective January 1, 2014 and again effective January 1, 2015. Under the Aircraft Lease in 2017, we leased an airplane owned by Lariat Ranch at a rate of $1,508.75 per flight hour, subject to quarterly redetermination by the parties, and are also responsible for all operating costs associated with our use of the aircraft, including flight crew costs and airport charges. Laredo incurred approximately $323,575 in expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 for business trips pursuant to this policy. In connection with the Aircraft Lease, our board of directors adopted a revised aircraft use policy, which also covers our reimbursement of expenses related to flight training and certification of Mr. Foutch and other related expenses, that would otherwise have been paid by Lariat Ranch for use of Lariat Ranch's aircraft not directly related to Laredo's business, which are included under "All other


Table of Contents

compensation," in our "Summary compensation table" in the "—Summary Compensation" section above.

        Mr. Foutch and Company employees travel extensively for Company business, often on short notice and to areas that have limited access to direct commercial flights. Therefore, our board of directors has determined that the ability to have access when necessary to Lariat's dedicated aircraft is an efficient, safer and cost-effective option that is beneficial to us. Although Mr. Foutch is a fully qualified pilot with a single-pilot rating and has flown his aircraft solo for business while working for other companies in the past, we believe it is in our best interest to require the presence of a fully-licensed and qualified co-pilot with him, or two pilots, and certain specified safety and mechanical inspections to assure the airworthiness of the aircraft.


Table of Contents


ITEM TWO

RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

        The Audit Committee of the board of directors has selected Grant Thornton LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for 2018. Grant Thornton LLP has audited Laredo's consolidated financial statements since its inception in 2007.

        The board of directors is submitting the selection of Grant Thornton LLP for ratificationvote your shares at the Annual Meeting. The submissionThose persons will also be authorized to vote your shares to adjourn the Annual Meeting from time to time and to vote your shares at any adjournments or postponements of this matter for approval by stockholders is not legally required, but the board of directors and the Audit Committee believe the submission provides an opportunity for stockholders through their vote to communicateAnnual Meeting.

In accordance with the boardrules and regulations adopted by the SEC, we are providing our stockholders access to our proxy materials on the Internet. Accordingly, a Notice of directorsInternet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) will be mailed to most of our stockholders beginning on April 6, 2023. The Notice will include:
(i)instructions on how to access the Company’s proxy materials electronically,
(ii)the date, time and the Audit Committee about an important aspect of corporate governance. If the stockholders do not ratify the selection of Grant Thornton LLP, the Audit Committee will reconsider the selection of that firm as the Company's auditors.

        The Audit Committee has the sole authority and responsibility to retain, evaluate and replace the Company's auditors. The stockholders' ratificationlocation of the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP does not limit the authorityAnnual Meeting,

(iii)a description of the Audit Committeematters intended to change auditors at any time.

Audit and Other Fees

        The table below sets forth the aggregate fees billed to Laredo by Grant Thornton LLP, the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, for the last two fiscal years:

 
 2017 2016 

Audit fees(1)

 $565,000 $585,000 

Tax fees(2)

  17,250  35,455 

Total

 $582,250 $620,455 

(1)
Audit fees represent fees for professional services provided in connection with: (a) the annual audit of Laredo's consolidated financial statements; (b) the review of Laredo's quarterly consolidated financial statements; and (c) review of Laredo's other filings with the SEC, including review and preparation of registration statements, comfort letters, consents and research necessary to comply with generally accepted auditing standards for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

(2)
Tax fees represent review of tax return and consultation on tax matters for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

        The Audit Committee Charter and its pre-approval policy require that the Audit Committee review and pre-approve the plan and scope of Grant Thornton LLP's audit and tax services. Laredo's Audit Committee pre-approved 100% of the services described above under the captions "Audit fees" and "Tax fees" for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

        The Company expects that representatives of Grant Thornton LLP will be presentacted upon at the Annual Meeting, to respond to appropriate questions and to make

(iv)a statement if they desire to do so.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTEFOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF GRANT THORNTON LLP AS THE AUDITORS OF THE COMPANY FOR 2018.


Table of Contents


ITEM THREE

ADVISORY VOTE ON COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

        As required by Section 14Alist of the Exchange Act, which was added under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, we are seekingmaterials being made available electronically,

(v)instructions on how a stockholder approval on an advisory, non-binding basiscan request to receive paper or e-mail copies of the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed inCompany’s proxy materials,
(vi)any control/identification numbers that a stockholder needs to access his or her proxy card and instructions on how to access the section of this Proxy Statement titled "Executive Compensation." In this proposal, stockholders are being asked to vote on the following advisory resolution:

        "RESOLVED, that the stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402(m) through (q) of Regulation S-K, including the compensation tablesproxy card, and the other narrative executive compensation disclosure in the Proxy Statement for our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders."

        Stockholders are urged to read the "Executive Compensation" section of this Proxy Statement, which discusses in detail how our compensation policies and procedures implement our compensation philosophy, and to refer to the related executive compensation tables. The compensation of our named executive officers is based on a philosophy that ties a substantial portion of an executive's compensation to our attainment of financial and other performance measures that, our board of directors believes, promote the creation of long-term stockholder value and position our company for long-term success. As described more fully in the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis," the mix of fixed- and performance-based compensation, as well as the terms of restricted stock awards, stock option awards (awarded prior to 2018) and performance unit awards are designed to enable our Company to attract and retain top talent while, at the same time, creating a close relationship between our Company's performance and overall stockholder return and the named executive officers' compensation. Our Compensation Committee and board of directors believe that the philosophy of the program, and hence the compensation awarded to named executive officers under the current program, fulfills this objective.

        Although the vote is advisory and non-binding, our board of directors and Compensation Committee value the opinions that our stockholders express in their votes and will consider the voting results in connection with their ongoing evaluation of our compensation program.

        The affirmative "FOR" vote of a majority of the votes cast at

(vii)(vii)information about attending the Annual Meeting is required to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers. Unless otherwise instructed on the proxy, properly executed proxies will be votedand voting in favor of approving the advisory, non-binding basis of the compensation of our named executive officers.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTEFOR THE ADVISORY RESOLUTION APPROVING THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.

person.

Table of Contents


ITEM FOUR

ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON THE COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

        We are seeking a vote, on a non-binding advisory basis, regarding the frequency of the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed pursuant to the executive compensation disclosure rules of the SEC. Stockholders may vote to approve holding an advisory vote on the compensation of the Company's named executive officers every one, two or three years.

        Our board of directors recommends that the advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation occur every year (annually). Our board of directors previously determined to hold an advisory vote on the compensation of the named executive officers every year until the next required advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes. Our board of directors believes this frequency is appropriate because we value stockholder input on executive compensation and believe that an annual advisory vote will provide us with regular input on important issues relating to executive compensation.

        When voting on this advisory vote on the frequency of the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers, stockholders should understand that they are not voting "for" or "against" the recommendation of our board of directors to hold the advisory vote every year. Rather, stockholders will have the optionability to choose whether to approve holding future advisory votesaccess the proxy materials on the compensationwebsite referred to in the Notice, or request a printed set of our named executive officers every one, two or three years, or to abstain entirely from voting on the matter. The option that receives the most votes from stockholders will be considered by our board of directors as the stockholder's recommendation as to the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of the our named executive officers. However, the outcome of this vote on the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers is advisory and will not be binding. Accordingly, our board of directors may choose to hold the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers on a more or less frequent basis than the option recommended by stockholders. Nevertheless, our board of directors will review and consider the outcome of this vote when making its determination as to the frequency of future advisory stockholder votes on the compensation of our named executive officers.

        The frequency option ("ONE," "TWO," or "THREE" years) receiving a majority of the votes cast will be the option selected by the stockholders. Unless otherwise instructed on the proxy, properly executed proxies will be voted in favor of a frequency of ANNUAL future advisory votes regarding executive compensation.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTEONE YEAR AS THE FREQUENCY WITH WHICH AN ADVISORY VOTE OCCURS ON THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.


Table of Contents


STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS; IDENTIFICATION OF DIRECTOR CANDIDATES

        Stockholders who, in accordance with Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, wish to present proposals for inclusion in the proxy materials to be distributedsent to them by following instructions on the Notice. All stockholders who do not receive a Notice should receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail.

If you choose to receive future proxy materials by e-mail, you will receive an e-mail next year with instructions containing a link to those materials and a link to the proxy voting site. Your election to receive proxy materials by e-mail or printed form will remain in connectioneffect until you terminate it.
We intend to hold our Annual Meeting in person. We may impose additional procedures or limitations on meeting attendees beyond those described in this Proxy Statement. Such additional precautionary measures may include, in compliance with guidance issued by the 2019 annualU.S. Centers for Disease Control, restricting the number of meeting attendees gathered in one room and requiring that all meeting attendees wear a mask and remain at a minimum six feet from other persons at all times.
Alternatively, we are planning for the possibility that the meeting may be held solely by means of stockholders must submit their proposalsremote communication. If we take this step, we will announce by press release the decision to do so that they are received at our principal executive offices no later than the close of businessin advance, along with details on November 28, 2018, or,how to participate in the eventmeeting. If it becomes necessary, a meeting by remote communication will not impact your ability to vote in advance of the Company's 2019 annual meeting by telephone, internet, mobile device or mail.


86Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
Q.Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?
A.Holders of record of our common stock at the close of business on March 28, 2023, which we refer to as the “Record Date,” are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. As of the Record Date, there were 17,025,123 shares of our common stock outstanding. Stockholders are entitled to cast one vote per share on each matter presented for consideration and action at the Annual Meeting.
Q.What are the proposals to be addressed at the Annual Meeting, how does the Board recommend I vote and what are the voting requirements for each proposal?
A.At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will consider and vote upon the four items listed below in the table and the table also contains the voting requirements to approve each of the listed items:
Item
Board’s
recommendation
Voting requirements
Abstentions &
broker non-votes
1Election of directors FOR
The persons receiving a majority of the votes cast “FOR” their election at the Annual Meeting will be elected.
Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, are not counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal.
2Ratification of appointment of independent public accounting firmFOR
To be approved by the stockholders, this item must receive the “FOR” vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal at the Annual Meeting.
Abstentions are not counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal. As this proposal is considered routine under NYSE rules, there will be no broker non-votes on this proposal.
3Advisory vote approving the compensation of our named executive officersFOR
To be approved by the stockholders, this item must receive the “FOR” vote of a majority of the votes cast on this proposal at the Annual Meeting.
Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, are not counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal. The results of the votes on this proposal are not binding on the Board of Directors, whether or not the resolution is passed under these voting standards.
4Approval of an amendment and restatement of the Certificate of Incorporation to clarify and eliminate obsolete provisionsFOR
To be approved by the stockholders, this item must receive the “FOR” vote of the holders of at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the voting power of all of the then-outstanding shares of the capital stock of the Company entitled to vote thereon, voting together as a single class.
Abstentions, if any, will have the effect of a vote against this proposal. As this proposal is considered routine under NYSE rules, there will be no broker non-votes on this proposal.


Proxy Statement Questions & Answers87
Q.Why did I receive a Notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials this year instead of a full set of proxy materials?
A.As permitted by SEC rules, we are providing access to our proxy materials over the Internet. As a result, we are sending to most of our stockholders a Notice instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials. The Notice contains instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet and how to request a paper copy. In addition, stockholders may request to receive future proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by e-mail. A stockholder’s election to receive proxy materials by mail or e-mail will remain in effect until the stockholder terminates it.
Q.Why didn’t I receive a Notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials?
A.We are providing certain stockholders, including those who have previously requested to receive paper copies of the proxy materials, with paper copies of the proxy materials instead of a Notice. If you would like to help reduce the costs we incur in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receive all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions provided with your proxy materials and on your proxy card or voting instruction card to vote using the Internet. When prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access stockholder communications electronically in the future.
Q.Can I vote my stock by filling out and returning the Notice?
A.No. However, the Notice will provide instructions on how to vote over the Internet, by telephone, by requesting and returning a paper proxy card or by submitting a ballot in person at the Annual Meeting.
Q.How can I access the proxy materials over the Internet?
A.Your Notice or proxy card will contain instructions on how to view our proxy materials on the Internet. Our proxy materials are also available on our website at: www.vitalenergy.com.
You may vote by any of the following four methods:
(1)Internet. Vote over the Internet at www.proxyvote.com, the website for Internet voting. Simply follow the instructions on the Notice, or if you received a proxy card by mail, follow the instructions on the proxy card, and you can confirm that your vote has been properly recorded. If you vote on the Internet, you can request electronic delivery of future proxy materials. Internet voting facilities for stockholders of record will be available 24 hours a day and will close at 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on May 24, 2023.
(2)Telephone. Vote by telephone by following the instructions on the Notice, or if you received a proxy card, by following the instructions on the proxy card. Easy-to-follow voice prompts allow you to vote your shares and confirm that your vote has been properly recorded. Telephone voting facilities for stockholders of record will be available 24 hours a day and will close at 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on May 24, 2023.
(3)Mail. If you received a proxy card by mail, vote by mail by completing, signing, dating and returning your proxy card in the pre-addressed, postage-paid envelope provided. If you vote by mail and your proxy card is advanced or delayed more than 30 days fromreturned unsigned, then your vote cannot be counted. If you vote by mail and the datereturned proxy card is signed without indicating how you want to vote, then your proxy will be voted as recommended by the Board of Directors. If mailed, your completed and signed proxy card must be received by May 24, 2023.
(4)Meeting. If you are a stockholder of record as of March 28, 2023, you may attend and vote at the Annual Meeting withinon May 25, 2023.
If you hold your Company shares in a reasonable time beforebrokerage account, your ability to vote over the Company begins to print and mailInternet or by telephone depends on your broker’s voting process. Please follow the directions on your proxy materials forcard or the 2019 annual meeting. As the SEC rules make clear, simply submitting a proposal does not guaranteevoting instruction card from your broker carefully.
The Board of Directors recommends that it will be included in the Company's proxy materials.

        In addition, stockholders who wish to introduce a proposal from the flooryou vote using one of the 2019 annual meetingfirst three methods discussed above, as it is not practical for most stockholders to attend and vote at the Annual Meeting. Using one of stockholders (outside the processes of Rule 14a-8), must submit that proposal in writingfirst three methods discussed above to the Company's Corporate Secretaryvote will not limit your right to vote at our principal executive offices no earlier than January 14, 2019 and no later than February 11, 2019, or, in the event the Company's 2019 annual meeting of stockholders is advanced or delayed more than 30 days from the date of the Annual Meeting notif you later decide to attend in person.



88Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
Q.How can I vote my shares in person at the Annual Meeting?
A.
Stockholders of Record. If your shares are registered directly in your name with the American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, an Equiniti Company (“AST”), our “transfer agent,” you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares, and the Notice or proxy materials are being mailed to you. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to vote in person at the Annual Meeting. If you choose to do so, you can bring the proxy card or vote using the ballot provided at the Annual Meeting. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we recommend that you vote your shares in advance as described above so that your vote will be counted if you decide later not to attend the Annual Meeting.
Beneficial Owners. Most of our stockholders hold their shares in street name through a broker, bank or other nominee rather than directly in their own name. In that case, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, and the proxy materials are being forwarded to you together with a voting instruction card. As the beneficial owner, you are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting. Because a beneficial owner is not the stockholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you obtain a “legal proxy” from the broker, bank or nominee that holds your shares, giving you the right to vote the shares at the Annual Meeting. You will need to contact your broker, bank or nominee to obtain a legal proxy, and you will need to bring it to the Annual Meeting in order to vote in person.
Q.What happens if additional matters are presented at the Annual Meeting?
A.Other than the four items of business described in this Proxy Statement, we are not aware of any other business to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting. If you grant a proxy, the persons named as proxies will have the discretion to vote your shares on any additional matters properly presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting.
Q.What happens if I do not give specific voting instructions?
A.
If you are a stockholder of record, and vote without giving specific voting instructions, the proxyholders will vote your shares in the manner recommended by our Board of Directors on all matters presented in this Proxy Statement, and, with respect to any other matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting, as the proxyholders may determine in their discretion.
If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in the name of a broker, bank or other nominee and do not provide that broker, bank or other nominee with voting instructions in the proxy card, your broker may vote your shares only with respect to certain matters considered routine. For any matters that are not routine for which you do not provide voting instructions in the proxy card, your shares will constitute “broker non-votes” and will not be counted as a vote cast on that proposal. With respect to the matters being voted on at the Annual Meeting, your broker may not vote on the election of directors and the compensation of our named executive officers if you do not furnish instructions for these matters. Thus, assuming that a quorum is obtained, such broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of these matters. Your broker may, however, vote in its discretion on the ratification of the appointment of our independent public accounting firm.
Q.What is the quorum requirement for the Annual Meeting?
A.
A majority of the Company’s outstanding shares entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting as of the Record Date must be present, in person or by proxy, at the Annual Meeting in order to hold the Annual Meeting and conduct business. This is called a quorum. Your shares will be counted for purposes of determining if there is a quorum, whether representing votes for, against, withheld or abstained, if you:
are present and vote at the Annual Meeting; or
properly submit a proxy card or vote over the Internet or by telephone.
Broker non-votes are counted as present for the purpose of determining the existence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting. If a quorum is not present, the chairman of the Annual Meeting may adjourn the meeting to another place, if any, date, or time.


Proxy Statement Questions & Answers89
Q.How can I change my vote after I return my proxy card?
A.
If you are a stockholder of record, there are three ways you can change your vote or revoke your proxy after you have sent in your proxy card.
First, you may send a written notice stating that you would like to revoke your proxy to Vital Energy, Inc. c/o Corporate Secretary Santa Fe Plaza, 521 E. 2nd Street, Suite 1000, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74120.
Second, you may complete and submit another valid proxy by mail, telephone or over the Internet that is later dated and if mailed, is properly signed, or if submitted by telephone or over the Internet is received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 24, 2023. Any earlier proxies will be revoked automatically.
Third, you may attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person. Any earlier proxy will be revoked. However, attending the Annual Meeting without voting in person will not revoke your proxy.
If you hold your shares through a broker, bank or other nominee and you have instructed the broker, bank or other nominee to vote your shares, you must follow directions from your broker, bank or other nominee to change your vote.
Q.Who will tabulate the votes?
A.
The Board of Directors has appointed our transfer agent, AST, to certify the tabulated vote and AST will have a representative to act as the independent inspector of elections for the Annual Meeting. AST will be responsible for:
(i)determining the presence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting,
(ii)receiving all votes and ballots, whether by proxy or in person, with regard to all matters voted upon at the Annual Meeting,
(iii)counting and tabulating all such votes and ballots, and
(iv)determining and reporting the results with regard to all such matters voted upon at the Annual Meeting.
Q.Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?
A.We intend to announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and publish final results in a Current Report on Form 8-K to be filed with the SEC within four business days following the Annual Meeting.
Q.How can I obtain a separate set of proxy materials?
A.
We have adopted a procedure approved by the SEC known as “householding.” Under this procedure, multiple stockholders residing at the same address have the convenience of receiving a single copy of our Annual Report and Proxy Statement, unless they have notified us that they want to continue receiving multiple copies. Householding allows us to reduce the environmental impact of providing proxy materials as well as printing and mailing costs.
If you received a householded mailing this year and you would like to have additional copies of the Annual Report and/or Proxy Statement mailed to you, or you would like to revoke your consent to the householding of documents, please submit your request to Vital Energy, Inc. c/o Corporate Secretary Santa Fe Plaza, 521 E. 2nd, Suite 1000, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74120, or by calling (918) 513-4570.
Unfortunately, householding for bank and brokerage accounts is limited to accounts within the same bank or brokerage firm. For example, if you and your spouse each have an account containing our common stock at different brokerage firms, your household will receive two copies of our Annual Meeting materials—one from each brokerage firm. To reduce the number of duplicate sets of materials your household receives, you may wish to enroll some or all of your accounts in our electronic delivery program.


90Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
Q.Who pays for the cost of this proxy solicitation?
A.We will pay for the costs of the solicitation of proxies. We may reimburse brokerage firms and other persons for expenses incurred in forwarding the voting materials to their customers who are beneficial owners and obtaining their voting instructions. Vital has retained the services of Georgeson LLC (“Georgeson”) to aid in the solicitation of proxies from banks, brokers, nominees and intermediaries. Vital will pay Georgeson a fee of approximately $15,000 for its services, plus reasonable out of pocket expenses. In addition to soliciting proxies by mail, our Board of Directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies on our behalf, without additional compensation, personally or by telephone. Stockholders voting over the Internet should understand that there may be costs associated with electronic access, such as the usage charges from telephone companies and Internet access providers, that must be borne by the stockholder.
Q.What is the deadline to propose actions for consideration at next year’s annual meeting?
A.Stockholders who, in accordance with Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, wish to present proposals for inclusion in the proxy materials to be distributed in connection with the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders, must submit their proposals so that they are received at our principal executive offices no later than December 8, 2023, or, in the event the Company’s 2024 annual meeting is advanced or delayed more than 30 days from the date of the Annual Meeting, within a reasonable time before the Company begins to print and mail the proxy materials for the 2024 Annual Meeting.
In addition, stockholders who wish to introduce a proposal from the floor of the 2023 Annual Meeting of stockholders (outside the processes of Rule 14a-8), must submit that proposal in writing to the Company’s Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices no earlier than January 22, 2024 and no later than February 21, 2024, or, in the event the Company’s 2024 annual meeting of stockholders is advanced or delayed more than 30 days from the date of the anniversary of the Annual Meeting, not later than the later of (i) the 90th day before the 2024 annual meeting or (ii) the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the 2024 annual meeting is first made by the Company.
To be in proper form, a stockholder’s notice must be timely delivered to:
c/o Vital Energy, Inc.
Santa Fe Plaza
521 E. 2nd Street
Suite 1000
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74120
It must include the information required by our Bylaws with respect to each proposal submitted. The Company may refuse to consider any proposal that is not timely or otherwise fails to meet the requirements of our bylaws or the SEC’s rules with respect to the submission of proposals.
You may obtain a copy of our bylaws by accessing our website (www.vitalenergy.com) or submitting a request to the address listed above.


Proxy Statement Questions & Answers91
Q.How do I nominate a candidate for election as a director?
A.
Stockholders may nominate directors in accordance with the Company Bylaws. Stockholders who wish to nominate a candidate for election as a director at our 2024 annual meeting must submit their nomination in writing to the Company’s Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices no earlier than January 22, 2024 and no later than February 21, 2024, or, in the event the Company’s 2024 annual meeting of stockholders is advanced or delayed more than 30 days from the date of the Annual Meeting, not later than the later of (i) the 90th day before the 2024 annual meeting or (ii) the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the 2024 annual meeting is first made by the Company.
In the event that the number of directors to be elected to the Board of Directors is increased and there has been no public announcement naming all of the nominees for director or indicating the increase made by the Company at least 10 days before the last day a stockholder may deliver a notice of nomination in accordance with the preceding sentence, a stockholder’s notice will be considered timely, but only with respect to nominees for any new positions created by such increase, if it is received by the Corporate Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Company not later than the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which such public announcement is first made by the Company.
To be in proper form, a stockholder’s notice must be timely delivered to: Vital Energy, Inc. c/o Corporate Secretary Santa Fe Plaza, 521 E. 2nd Street, Suite 1000, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74120.
Any stockholder notice of nomination must include the information required by our bylaws with respect to the nomination and all other information regarding the proposed nominee and the nominating stockholder required by Section 14 of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. The Company may refuse to consider any nomination that is not timely or otherwise fails to meet the requirements of our bylaws or the SEC’s rules with respect to the submission of director nominations. A written statement from the proposed nominee consenting to be named as a candidate and, if nominated and elected, to serve as a director should accompany any stockholder nomination.
In addition to the above, to comply with the universal proxy rules, stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees must provide notice that complies with the additional requirements of Rule 14a-19(b) under the Exchange Act.
Q.How can I communicate with the Board of Directors?
A.
Stockholders or other interested parties can contact any director, any committee of the Board of Directors, or the Company’s non-management directors as a group, by writing to the Corporate Secretary at the address above.
Comments or complaints relating to the Company’s accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters will also be referred to members of the Audit Committee. All such communications will be forwarded to the appropriate member(s) of the Board of Directors.
This Question & Answer section is only meant to give an overview of the proxy statement. For more information, please refer to the material contained in the preceding pages.


92Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
Additional Information
Solicitation of (i) the 90th day before the 2019 annual meeting or (ii) the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the annual meeting is first made by the Company.

        To be in proper form, a stockholder's notice must include the information required by our bylaws with respect to each proposal submitted. The Company may refuse to consider any proposal that is not timely or otherwise does not meet the requirements of our bylaws or the SEC's rules with respect to the submission of proposals. You may obtain a copy of our bylaws by submitting a request to Laredo Petroleum, Inc., c/o Corporate Secretary, 15 W. Sixth Street, Suite 900, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119.

        Directors may be nominated by the board of directors or by stockholders in accordance with the bylaws of the Company. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will review all nominees for the board of directors, including proposed nominees of stockholders, in accordance with its charter. In evaluating the suitability of candidates, the board of directors and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee take into account many factors, including the nominee's judgment, experience, independence, character, business acumen and such other factors as the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee concludes are pertinent in light of the current needs of the board of directors. The board of directors believes that its membership should reflect a diversity of experience, gender, race, ethnicity and age. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will select qualified nominees and review its recommendations with the board of directors, which will decide whether to invite the nominees to join the board of directors. When evaluating the suitability of an incumbent director for nomination or re-election, the board of directors and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also consider the director's past performance, including attendance at meetings and participation in and contributions to the activities of the board of directors.

        The board of directors and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believe they have achieved the sought after balance described above through the representation on the board of directors of members having experience in the oil and gas industry, accounting and investment analysis, among other areas. The board of directors and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee do not discriminate based upon race, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, citizenship or any other legally protected status.

        In identifying potential director candidates, the board of directors and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee rely on any source available for the identification and recommendation of candidates, including current directors and officers. In addition, the board of directors and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee from time to time may engage a third-party search firm to identify or evaluate, or assist in identifying or evaluating potential candidates, for which the third party search firm will be paid a fee.

Proxies

Table of Contents

        The board of directors and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will also consider any nominee recommended by stockholders for election at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2019 if that nomination is submitted in writing, between January 14, 2019 and February 11, 2019, or in the event the Company's 2019 annual meeting of stockholders is advanced or delayed more than 30 days from the date of the Annual Meeting, not later than the later of (i) the 90th day before the 2019 annual meeting or (ii) the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the annual meeting is first made by the Company. In the event that the number of directors to be elected to the board of directors is increased and there has been no public announcement naming all of the nominees for director or indicating the increase made by the Company at least 10 days before the last day a stockholder may deliver a notice of nomination in accordance with the preceding sentence, a stockholder's notice will be considered timely, but only with respect to nominees for any new positions created by such increase, if it is received by the Corporate Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Company not later than the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which such public announcement is first made by the Company.

        As set forth in the Company's bylaws, with respect to each such nominee, the following information must be provided to the Company with the written nomination:

        Each submission must also include a statement of the qualifications of the nominee, a notarized consent signed by the nominee evidencing a willingness to serve as a director, if elected, and a written representation and agreement that such person (i) is not and will not become a party to any voting agreement or compensation agreement that has not been disclosed to the Company or that could limit or interfere with the nominee's ability to comply with their fiduciary duties under applicable law and (ii) will comply with all of the Company's applicable corporate governance, conflict of interest, confidentiality and stock ownership and trading policies and guidelines.

        Written requests for inclusion of any stockholder proposal should be addressed to Laredo Petroleum, Inc., c/o Corporate Secretary, 15 W. Sixth Street, Suite 900, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119. The Company suggests that any such proposal be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested.

SOLICITATION OF PROXIES

Solicitation of proxies may be made over the Internet, by mail, personal interview or telephone by officers, directors and regular employees of the Company. The Company may also request banking institutions, brokerage firms, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward solicitation material to the beneficial owners of the common stock that those companies or persons hold of record, and the Company will reimburse the forwarding expenses.

STOCKHOLDER LIST

Stockholder List
In accordance with the Delaware General Corporation Law, the Company will maintain at its corporate offices in Tulsa, Oklahoma, a list of the stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.


Table of Contents

The list will be open to the examination of any stockholder, for purposes germane to the Annual Meeting, during ordinary business hours for 10 days before the Annual Meeting.

PROXY MATERIALS, ANNUAL REPORT AND OTHER INFORMATION

        The Company's 2017

Proxy Materials, Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2017 is being made available to stockholders concurrently with this Proxy Statement and does not form part of the proxy solicitation material.

Other Information

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting to be Held on May 25, 2023
A Copy of the Proxy Statement, the Proxy Card and the 2022 Annual Report are Available free of Charge
at http://materials.proxyvote.com/516806

Table of Contents


IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR
THE ANNUAL MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 17, 2018

A COPY OF THE PROXY STATEMENT, THE PROXY CARD AND
THE 2017 ANNUAL REPORT ARE AVAILABLE FREE OF CHARGE AT
http://materials.proxyvote.com/516806

A copy of the 20172022 Annual Report, as filed with the SEC, will be sent to any stockholder without charge upon written request. One copy of the Notice of Annual Meeting, this Proxy Statement and our 20172022 Annual Report (the "Proxy Materials"“Proxy Materials”) will be sent to stockholders who share an address, unless they have notified the Company that they want to continue receiving multiple packages. A copy of the Proxy Materials will also be sent upon written or oral request to any stockholder of a shared address to which a single copy of the Proxy Materials was delivered. If two or more stockholders with a shared address are currently receiving only one copy of the Proxy Materials, then the stockholders may request to receive multiple packages in the future, or if a stockholder is currently receiving multiple packages of the Proxy Materials, then the stockholder may request to receive a single copy in the future. Such requests may be made by writing to Laredo Petroleum, Inc., c/o Corporate Secretary, 15 W. Sixth Street, Suite 900, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119 or by calling (918) 513-4570. to:
c/o Vital Energy, Inc.
Santa Fe Plaza
521 E. 2
nd Street
Suite 1000
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74120
or by calling
(918) 513-4570
The 20172022 Annual Report is also available at the SEC'sSEC’s website in its EDGAR database at www.sec.gov.


INTERNET AND PHONE VOTING



Additional Information93
Internet and Phone Voting
Internet and phone voting procedures are designed to authenticate stockholder identities, to allow stockholders to give their voting instructions and to confirm that stockholders'stockholders’ instructions have been recorded properly. Stockholders voting by Internet should remember that the stockholder must bear costs associated with electronic access, such as usage charges from Internet access providers and telephone companies.

For shares of stock that are registered in a street name (the stockholder owns shares in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record on the books of the Company'sCompany’s transfer agent), you will receive instructions with your proxy materials that you must follow in order to have your shares voted. Please review your proxy or voting instruction card to determine whether you can vote electronically or by phone.

SUBMIT A PROXY BY INTERNET—

Submit a Proxy by Internet—www.proxyvote.com

For shares of stock that are registered in your name, you may vote by Internet or phone using the following procedures. To vote by Internet, please access www.proxyvote.com, and enter your 1116 digit control number located in the upper right-hand portion of your proxy material. Votes submitted by Internet or phone must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on May 16, 2018.24, 2023. The giving of such a proxy will not affect your right to vote in person should you decide to attend the Annual Meeting.

SUBMIT A PROXY BY PHONE—

Submit a Proxy by Phone—1-800-690-6903

To vote by phone, please dial 1-800-690-6903 and enter your 1116 digit control number located in the upper right-hand portion of your proxy material. Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time on May 16, 2018.

VOTE BY MAIL

24, 2023.

Vote by Mail
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided.


Table

Electronic Delivery of Contents

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

Future Proxy Materials

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by us in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

IT IS IMPORTANT THAT PROXIES BE RETURNED PROMPTLY. WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE MEETING IN PERSON, YOU ARE URGED TO VOTE BY INTERNET, BY PHONE OR, IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED PAPER COPIES OF THE PROXY MATERIAL, BY COMPLETING, SIGNING AND RETURNING THE PROXY IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID, ADDRESSED ENVELOPE.

It is important that proxies be returned promptly. Whether or not you expect to attend the meeting in person, you are urged to vote by Internet, by phone or, if you have received paper copies of the proxy material, by completing, signing and returning the proxy in the enclosed postage-paid, addressed envelope.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
lpi-20230405_g7.jpg
Mark D. Denny
Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel
Tulsa, Oklahoma

March 28, 2018


April 6, 2023


By Order of the Board of Directors,

94


GRAPHIC
Kenneth E. Dornblaser
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and
Corporate Secretary
Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement

Annex A

Annex A—Non-GAAP Financial Measures
The non-GAAP financial measures of Free Cash Flow, Consolidated EBITDAX and Net Debt, as defined by us, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. Therefore, these non-GAAP financial measures should be considered in conjunction with net income or loss and other financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. Free Cash Flow, Consolidated EBITDAX and Net Debt should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for GAAP measures, such as net income or loss, operating income or loss or any other GAAP measure of leverage or financial performance.

VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com Use

Free Cash Flow (Unaudited)
Free Cash Flow is a non-GAAP financial measure that we define as net cash provided by operating activities (GAAP) before changes in operating assets and liabilities, net, less incurred capital expenditures, excluding non-budgeted acquisition costs. Management believes Free Cash Flow is useful to management and investors in evaluating operating trends in our business that are affected by production, commodity prices, operating costs and other related factors. There are significant limitations to the Internetuse of Free Cash Flow as a measure of performance, including the lack of comparability due to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic deliverythe different methods of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the website and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. LAREDO PETROLEUM, INC. 15 W. SIXTH STREET, SUITE 900 TULSA, OK 74119 ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurredcalculating Free Cash Flow reported by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: E41009-P02953 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. LAREDO PETROLEUM, INC. The Boarddifferent companies.
For a reconciliation of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following: For Withhold For All AllAllExcept To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark "For All Except" and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. ! ! ! 1. Election of Directors Nominees: 01) 02) 03) James R. Levy Dr. Myles W. Scoggins Donald D. Wolf For Against Abstain The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3. ! ! ! ! ! ! 2. The ratification of Grant Thornton LLP as the independent registered public accounting firmFree Cash Flow (i) for the fiscal year endingyears ended December 31, 2018. 3. Advisory vote2022 and 2021, please see page 57 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, and (ii) for the year ended December 31, 2020, please see pages 64 and 65 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.
Consolidated EBITDAX (Unaudited)
Consolidated EBITDAX is a non-GAAP financial measure defined in the Company's Senior Secured Credit Facility as net income or loss (GAAP) plus adjustments for share-settled equity-based compensation; depletion, depreciation and amortization; impairment expense; gains or losses on disposal of assets; mark-to-market on derivatives; accretion expense; interest expense; income taxes and other non-recurring income and expenses. Consolidated EBITDAX is used by the Company’s management for various purposes, including as a measure of operating performance and compliance under the Company's Senior Secured Credit Facility. Additional information on the calculation of Consolidated EBITDAX can be found in the Company's Tenth Amendment to approve the compensationSenior Secured Credit Facility as filed with the SEC on November 3, 2022.
There are significant limitations to the use of Consolidated EBITDAX as a measure of performance, including the inability to analyze the effect of certain recurring and non-recurring items that materially affect our net income or loss and the lack of comparability of results of operations to different companies due to the different methods of calculating Consolidated EBITDAX reported by different companies.


Annex A95
The following table presents a reconciliation of net income (GAAP) to Consolidated EBITDAX (non-GAAP) for the periods presented:
(in thousands)Six months ended December 31, 2021
(Annualized)
Six months ended December 31, 2021(1)
Year ended December 31, 2022
Net income$353,108 $706,216 $631,512 
Plus:
Share-settled equity-based compensation, net3,877 7,754 8,403 
Depletion, depreciation and amortization137,270 274,540 311,640 
Impairment expense— — 40 
Organizational restructuring expenses— — 10,420 
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets, net(86,298)(172,596)1,079 
Mark-to-market on derivatives:
Loss on derivatives, net80,868 161,736 298,723 
Settlements paid for matured derivatives, net(222,087)(444,174)(486,753)
Settlements received for contingent consideration— — 2,457 
Accretion expense1,932 3,864 3,879 
Interest expense61,569 123,138 125,121 
Loss extinguishment of debt, net— — 1,459 
Income tax expense5,729 11,458 5,502 
Consolidated EBITDAX (non-GAAP)$335,968 $671,936 $913,482 
(1)Represents the second half of 2021 annualized due to significant acquisitions in 2021.
Net Debt (Unaudited)
Net Debt, a non-GAAP financial measure, is calculated as the face value of long-term debt plus any outstanding letters of credit, less cash and cash equivalents, where cash and cash equivalents are capped at $50 million when there are borrowings on the Senior Secured Credit Facility. Management believes Net Debt is useful to management and investors in determining the Company’s leverage position since the Company has the ability, and may decide, to use a portion of its cash and cash equivalents to reduce debt. Net Debt as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021 was $1.080 billion and $1.438 billion, respectively.


96Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
Annex B
SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
LAREDO PETROLEUM HOLDINGS, INC.
VITAL ENERGY, INC.
(Originally incorporated on August 12, 2011)
FIRST: The name of the named executive officers. ONE YEAR ! TWO YEARS ! THREE YEARS !corporation is Laredo Petroleum HoldingsVital Energy, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the “Corporation”).
SECOND: The Boardaddress of Directors recommends youthe registered office of the Corporation in the State of Delaware is Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, County of New Castle, Wilmington, Delaware, 19801. The name of the registered agent of the Corporation at that address is The Corporation Trust Company.
THIRD: The purpose of the Corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which a corporation may be organized under the Delaware General Corporation Law.
FOURTH: A. The total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is five hundred million (500,000,000)90,000,000, consisting of four hundred and fifty million (450,000,000)40,000,000 shares of Common Stockcommon stock, par value one cent ($.010.01) per share (the “Common Stock”), and fifty million (50,000,000) shares of Preferred Stockpreferred stock, par value one cent ($.010.01) per share (the “Preferred Stock”).
B. The board of directors is authorized, subject to any limitations prescribed by law, to provide for the issuance of shares of Preferred Stock in series, and by filing a certificate pursuant to the applicable law of the State of Delaware (such certificate being hereinafter referred to as a “Preferred Stock Designation”), to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in each such series, and to fix the designation, powers, preferences, and rights of the shares of each such series and any qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof. The number of authorized shares of Preferred Stock may be increased or decreased (but not below the number of shares thereof then outstanding) by the affirmative vote for ONE YEAR for proposal 4. ABSTAIN ! 4. Advisoryof the holders of a majority of the voting power of all of the then-outstanding shares of capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote thereon, without a vote of the holders of the Preferred Stock, or of any series thereof, unless a vote of any such holders is required pursuant to the terms of any Preferred Stock Designation.
C. Each outstanding share of Common Stock shall entitle the holder thereof to one vote on each matter properly submitted to the frequencystockholders of future advisory votesthe Corporation for their vote; provided, however, that, except as otherwise required by law, holders of Common Stock shall not be entitled to vote on any amendment to this Certificate of Incorporation (including any Preferred Stock Designation relating to any series of Preferred Stock) that relates solely to the compensationterms of named executive officers. NOTE: Suchone or more outstanding series of Preferred Stock if the holders of such affected series are entitled, either separately or together as a class with the holders of one or more other such series, to vote thereon pursuant to this Certificate of Incorporation (including any Preferred Stock Designation relating to any series of Preferred Stock).
FIFTH: The following provisions are inserted for the management of the business and the conduct of the affairs of the Corporation, and for further definition, limitation and regulation of the powers of the Corporation and of its directors and stockholders:
A. The business and affairs of the Corporation shall be managed by or under the direction of the board of directors. In addition to the powers and authority expressly conferred upon them by statute or by this Certificate of Incorporation or the bylaws of the Corporation, the directors are hereby empowered to exercise all such powers and do all such acts and things as may be exercised or done by the Corporation.


Annex B97
B. The directors of the Corporation need not be elected by written ballot unless the bylaws so provide.
C. Special meetings of stockholders of the Corporation may be called only by the board of directors acting pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority of the Whole Board. For purposes of this Certificate of Incorporation, the term “Whole Board” shall mean the total number of authorized directors whether or not there exist any vacancies in previously authorized directorships.
D. An annual meeting of stockholders, for the election of directors to succeed those whose terms expire and for the transaction of such other business as may properly come before the meeting, or any adjournment thereof. ! For address changes/comments, mark here. (see reverse for instructions) ! Yes ! No Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting. Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date


Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The 2017 Annual Report to Stockholders and Notice and Proxy Statement are available at www.proxyvote.com. E41010-P02953 LAREDO PETROLEUM, INC. Annual Meeting of Stockholders May 17, 2018 9:00 AM CDT This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors The undersigned hereby appoints Randy A. Foutch and Richard C. Buterbaugh as proxies, each with full power of substitution, to represent and vote, as designated on the reverse side, all the shares of Common Stock of Laredo Petroleum, Inc. held of record by the undersigned on March 20, 2018, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders toshall be held at such place, on such date, and at such time as the Bankboard of America Building, Lower Level, 15 West Sixth Street, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119directors shall fix.

SIXTH: A. The number of directors shall be fixed from time to time exclusively by the board of directors pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority of the Whole Board.
B. Until the Triggering Event (as defined below), and subjectSubject to the rights of the holders of any series of Preferred Stock to elect additional directors under specified circumstances, at each annual meeting of stockholders, directors shall be elected for a term of one year ending on May 17, 2018the date of the office to expire at the third succeeding annual meeting of stockholders following the annual meeting at which the director was elected, with each director to hold office until his or her successor shall have been duly elected and qualified.
Upon the tenth business day after the earlier of (i) the public announcement, after the consummation of the initial public offering of the Common Stock (the “IPO”), by the Corporation or affiliates of Warburg Pincus LLC that, or (ii) the public disclosure, after the IPO, of facts by the Corporation or affiliates of Warburg Pincus LLC indicating that, affiliates of Warburg Pincus LLC no longer beneficially own more than fifty percent (50%) of the outstanding Common Stock (the “Triggering Event”) and subject to the rights of the holders of any series of Preferred Stock to elect additional directors under specified circumstances, the board of directors, other than those directors who may be elected by the holders of any series of preferred stock under specified circumstances, shall be divided into three classes, with the term of office of the first class to expire at the first annual meeting of stockholders following the Triggering Event, the term of office of the second class to expire at the second annual meeting of stockholders following the Triggering Event and the term of office of the third class to expire at the third annual meeting of stockholders following the Triggering Event, with each director to hold office until his or her successor shall have been duly elected and qualified, and the board of directors shall be authorized to assign members of the board of directors already in office, other than those directors who may be elected by the holders of any series of Preferred Stock under specified circumstances, to such classes at the time such classification becomes effective. At each annual meeting of stockholders following the Triggering Event, directors elected to succeed those directors whose terms expire shall be elected for a term of office to expire at the third succeeding annual meeting of stockholders after their election, with each director to hold office until his or her successor shall have been duly elected and qualified.
C. If authorized by a resolution of the board of directors, directors may be elected by the stockholders to fill any vacancy on the board of directors, regardless of how such vacancy shall have been created.
D. A majority of the Whole Board shall constitute a quorum for all purposes at any meeting of the board of directors, and, except as otherwise expressly required by law or by this Certificate of Incorporation, all matters shall be determined by the affirmative vote of a majority of the directors present at any meeting at which a quorum is present.
E. Subject to the rights of the holders of any series of Preferred Stock then outstanding, newly created directorships resulting from any increase in the authorized number of directors or any adjournmentvacancies in the board of directors resulting from death, resignation, disqualification, removal from office or postponement thereof. IF YOU SPECIFYother cause shall, unless otherwise required by law or by resolution of the board of directors, be filled only by a majority vote of the directors then in office, though less than a quorum (and not by stockholders), and directors so chosen shall serve for a term expiring (i) if the Triggering Event has not occurred, at the succeeding annual meeting of stockholders and (ii) if the Triggering Event has occurred, at the annual meeting of stockholders at which the term of office of the class to which they have been chosen expires, in either case with each director to hold office until his or her successor shall have been duly elected and qualified. No decrease in the authorized number of directors shall shorten the term of any incumbent director.


98Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
F. Advance notice of stockholder nominations for the election of directors and of business to be brought by stockholders before any meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation shall be given in the manner provided in the bylaws of the Corporation.
G. Subject to the rights of the holders of any series of Preferred Stock then outstanding, any director, or the entire board of directors, may be removed from office at any time, with or without cause if the Triggering Event has not occurred, and only for cause if the Triggering Event has occurred, but in either caseand only by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the voting power of all of the then-outstanding shares of capital stock of the Corporation then entitled to vote at an election of directors, voting together as a single class.
SEVENTH: The board of directors is expressly empowered to adopt, amend or repeal bylaws of the Corporation. Any adoption, amendment or repeal of the bylaws of the Corporation by the board of directors shall require the approval of a majority of the Whole Board. The stockholders shall also have power to adopt, amend or repeal the bylaws of the Corporation; provided, however, that, in addition to any vote of the holders of any class or series of stock of the Corporation required by law or by this Certificate of Incorporation, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the voting power of all of the then-outstanding shares of the capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote thereon, voting together as a single class, shall be required to adopt, amend or repeal any provision of the bylaws of the Corporation.
EIGHTH: A VOTE ON A PROPOSAL, YOUR PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS SPECIFIED. IF NO SPECIFICATION IS MADE, THIS PROXY SHALL BE VOTED "FOR" PROPOSALS 1, 2, AND 3 AND "ONE YEAR" FOR PROPOSAL 4. IF ANY OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING TO BE VOTED ON, THE PROXY HOLDERS WILL VOTE, ACT AND CONSENT ON THOSE MATTERS IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXIES.director of the Corporation shall not be personally liable to the Corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability (i) for any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to the Corporation or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) under Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or (iv) for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit. If the Delaware General Corporation Law is amended to authorize corporate action further eliminating or limiting the personal liability of directors, then the liability of a director of the Corporation shall be eliminated or limited to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, as so amended.
Any repeal or modification of the foregoing paragraph shall not adversely affect any right or protection of a director of the Corporation existing at the time of such repeal or modification. All references in this Article EIGHTH to a director shall also be deemed to refer to any such director acting in his or her capacity as a Continuing Director (as defined below).
NINTH: Subject to the rights of the holders of any series of Preferred Stock, any action required or permitted to be taken at any annual or special meeting of stockholders may be taken without a meeting, without prior notice and without a vote, if a consent or consents in writing, setting forth the action so taken, shall be signed by the holders of outstanding capital stock of the Corporation having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares of the capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote thereon were present and voted; provided, however, that, following the IPO, on and after the date on which affiliates of Warburg Pincus LLC cease to beneficially own more than fifty percent (50%) of the outstanding Common Stock, any action required or permitted to be taken by stockholders may be effected only at a duly called annual or special meeting of stockholders and may not be effected by a written consent or consents by stockholders in lieu of such a meeting.
TENTH: The undersigned acknowledges receipt fromCorporation reserves the Company beforeright to amend or repeal any provision contained in this Certificate of Incorporation in the executionmanner prescribed by the laws of the State of Delaware and all rights conferred upon stockholders are granted subject to this reservation; provided, however, that, notwithstanding any other provision of this proxyCertificate of Incorporation or any provision of law that might otherwise permit a lesser vote or no vote, but in addition to any vote of the Noticeholders of Annual Meetingany class or series of Stockholders,the stock of this corporation required by law or by this Certificate of Incorporation, and the affirmative vote of the holders of at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the voting power of all of the then-outstanding shares of the capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote thereon, voting together as a Proxy Statementsingle class, shall be required to amend or repeal this Article TENTH, Sections C or D of Article FIFTH, Article SIXTH, Article SEVENTH,or Article EIGHTH or Article ELEVENTH.


Annex B99
ELEVENTH:[RESERVED]
ELEVENTH:To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, the Corporation, on behalf of itself and its subsidiaries, renounces any interest or expectancy of the Corporation and its subsidiaries in any business opportunity, transaction or other matter in which Warburg Pincus LLC or any private fund that it manages or advises, any of their officers, directors, partners, employees, and any portfolio company in which such entities or persons have an equity interest (other than the Corporation and its subsidiaries) (each, a “Specified Party”) participates or desires or seeks to participate in and that involves any aspect of the energy business or industry, even if the opportunity is one that the Corporation or its subsidiaries might reasonably be deemed to have pursued or had the ability or desire to pursue if granted the opportunity to do so and each such Specified Party shall have no duty to communicate or offer such business opportunity to the Corporation and, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, shall not be liable to the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries or any stockholder for breach of any fiduciary or other duty, as a director or officer or controlling stockholder or otherwise, by reason of the fact that such Specified Party pursues or acquires such business opportunity, directs such business opportunity to another person or fails to present such business opportunity, or information regarding such business opportunity, to the Corporation or its subsidiaries. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Corporation, on behalf of itself and its subsidiaries, does not hereby renounce any interest or expectancy it or its subsidiaries may have in any business opportunity, transaction or other matter that is offered in writing solely to (1) a director or officer of the Corporation or its subsidiaries who is not also a Specified Party, or (2) a Specified Party who is a director, officer or employee of the Corporation and who is offered such opportunity solely in his or her capacity as a director, officer or employee of the Corporation.
Neither the amendment nor repeal of this Article ELEVENTH, nor the adoption of any provision of this Certificate of Incorporation or the bylaws of the Corporation, nor, to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law, any modification of law, shall adversely affect any right or protection of any person granted pursuant hereto existing at, or arising out of or related to any event, act or omission that occurred prior to, the time of such amendment, repeal, adoption or modification.
If any provision or provisions of this Article ELEVENTH shall be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable as applied to any circumstance for any reason whatsoever: (a) the validity, legality and enforceability of such provisions in any other circumstance and of the remaining provisions of this Article ELEVENTH (including, without limitation, each portion of any paragraph of this Article ELEVENTH containing any such provision held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable that is not itself held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable) shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby and (b) to the fullest extent possible, the provisions of this Article ELEVENTH (including, without limitation, each such portion of any paragraph of this Article ELEVENTH containing any such provision held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable) shall be construed so as to permit the Corporation to protect its directors, officers, employees and agents from personal liability in respect of their good faith service to or for the Annual Meetingbenefit of Stockholders, and the 2017 Annual ReportCorporation to Stockholders. (If you notedthe fullest extent permitted by law.
This Article ELEVENTH shall not limit any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box onprotections or defenses available to, or indemnification rights of, any director or officer of the reverse side.) ContinuedCorporation under this Certificate of Incorporation or applicable law. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in any securities of the Corporation shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented to the provisions of this Article ELEVENTH.
TWELFTH: Unless the Corporation consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware shall be signedthe sole and exclusive forum for (a) any derivative action or proceeding brought on reverse side Address Changes/Comments:

behalf of the Corporation, (b) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer or other employee of the Corporation to the Corporation or the Corporation’s stockholders, (c) any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to, or a claim with respect to the interpretation or application of, any provision of the Delaware General Corporation Law, this Certificate of Incorporation or the bylaws of the Corporation or (d) any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of capital stock of the Corporation shall be deemed to have notice of and consented to the provisions of this Article TWELFTH.



100Vital Energy, Inc. 2023 Proxy Statement
THIRTEENTH: The board of directors is expressly authorized to cause the Corporation to issue rights pursuant to Section 157 of the Delaware General Corporation Law and, in connection therewith, to enter into any agreements necessary or convenient for such issuance, and to enter into other agreements necessary and convenient to the conduct of the business of the Corporation. Any such agreement may include provisions limiting, in certain circumstances, the ability of the board of directors of the Corporation to redeem the securities issued pursuant thereto or to take other action thereunder or in connection therewith unless there is a specified number or percentage of Continuing Directors then in office. Pursuant to Section 141(a) of the Delaware General Corporation Law, the Continuing Directors shall have the power and authority to make all decisions and determinations, and exercise or perform such other acts, that any such agreement provides that such Continuing Directors shall make, exercise or perform. For purposes of this Certificate of Incorporation and any such agreement, the term “Continuing Directors” shall mean (1) those directors who were members of the board of directors of the Corporation at the time the Corporation entered into such agreement and any director who subsequently becomes a member of the board of directors, if such director’s nomination for election to the board of directors is recommended or approved by the majority vote of the Continuing Directors then in office and (2) such other members of the board of directors, if any, designated in, or in the manner provided in, such agreement as Continuing Directors.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, which restates and integrates and further amends the provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation of this Corporation, and which has been duly adopted in accordance with Sections 228, 242 and 245 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, has been executed by its duly authorized officer this 19th day of December, 20112023.

LAREDO PETROLEUM HOLDINGSVITAL ENERGY, INC.
By:
Randy A. FoutchJason Pigott
ChairmanPresident and Chief Executive Officer



lpi-20230405_g78.jpg